This link has been bookmarked by 210 people . It was first bookmarked on 07 Jun 2008, by someone privately.
-
15 Mar 14
-
20 Jan 13
Andrew CaudillI believe this to be a valid source because it is in a .edu domain. The page was written by professionals whose names can easily be found near the top of the page. The page is relatively modern, being from June 2008. All the materials listed in the study are cited and contact information is given on the site.
-
However, the essential difference between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 is that content creators were few in Web 1.0 with the vast majority of users simply acting as consumers of content, while any participant can be a content creator in Web 2.0 and numerous technological aids have been created to maximize the potential for content creation. The democratic nature of Web 2.0 is exemplified by creations of large number of niche groups (collections of friends) who can exchange content of any kind (text, audio, video) and tag, comment, and link to both intra–group and extra–group “pages.”
-
-
10 Feb 12
-
18 Jan 12
-
27 Sep 11
-
05 May 11
-
07 Dec 10
eva durallArtículo sobre internet web 1.0 y la 2.0. Se centra en aspectos técnicos, pero también trata los principios y la filosofía (alguna alusión a redes sociales)
-
03 Nov 10
Amy DodsonKey Differences between Web 1.0 and 2.0
-
01 Nov 10
-
06 Sep 10
-
24 Aug 10
-
06 May 10
-
22 Jan 10
-
Other sites are resolutely Web1 in their approach: Craigslist, for example, emulates an e–mail list server, and has no public user profiles, or fancy dynamic pages.
-
- Users as first class entities in the system, with prominent profile pages, including such features as: age, sex, location, testimonials, or comments about the user by other users.
- The ability to form connections between users, via links to other users who are “friends,” membership in “groups” of various kinds, and subscriptions or RSS feeds of “updates” from other users.
- The ability to post content in many forms: photos, videos, blogs, comments and ratings on other users’ content, tagging of own or others’ content, and some ability to control privacy and sharing.
- Other more technical features, including a public API to allow third–party enhancements and “mash–ups,” and embedding of various rich content types (e.g., Flash videos), and communication with other users through internal e–mail or IM systems.
Some of the important site features that mark out a Web2 site include the following:
-
-
10 Jan 10
-
07 Aug 09
-
05 Jul 09
-
01 May 09
-
21 Apr 09
-
14 Apr 09
-
05 Apr 09
-
04 Apr 09
-
21 Mar 09
-
17 Feb 09
-
18 Jan 09
-
24 Dec 08
-
01 Dec 08
-
29 Nov 08
-
28 Nov 08
-
11 Nov 08
-
09 Nov 08
-
Bradley DilgerGraham Cormode and Balachander Krishnamurthy | Technical definition, focusing on site design, traffic, protocols, etc. after an introduction which includes features: users as entities; user-user connections; post content; other features (API, email, etc).
-
05 Nov 08
-
03 Nov 08
Thomas RybergWeb 2.0 is a buzzword introduced in 2003–04 which is commonly used to encompass various novel phenomena on the World Wide Web. Although largely a marketing term, some of the key attributes associated with Web 2.0 include the growth of social networks, bi–
-
08 Oct 08
-
02 Oct 08
-
15 Sep 08
-
02 Sep 08
-
27 Aug 08
Heather EbeyFirst Monday - volume 13, number 6, 2 June 2008. Overveiw of Web 2.0 and how it differs from Web 1.0. Authors: Graham Carmode and Balachander Krishnamurphy
web2.0 socialnetworking comparison web1.0 webdesign libr240-ebey
-
26 Aug 08
-
25 Aug 08
David GelbFirst Monday, Volume 13 Number 6 - 2 June 2008
web2.0 web1.0 technology socialmedia resources web education
-
18 Aug 08
Hans Joern NielsenArtikel i First Monday, vol 13 no 6, 2. june 2008
-
10 Aug 08
-
08 Aug 08
-
05 Aug 08
-
29 Jul 08
-
27 Jul 08
-
25 Jul 08
-
23 Jul 08
-
22 Jul 08
-
21 Jul 08
-
17 Jul 08
Alexander VießWeb 2.0 is a buzzword introduced in 2003–04 which is commonly used to encompass various novel phenomena on the World Wide Web. Although largely a marketing term, some of the key attributes associated with Web 2.0 include the growth of social networks, bi–directional communication, various ‘glue’ technologies, and significant diversity in content types. We are not aware of a technical comparison between Web 1.0 and 2.0. While most of Web 2.0 runs on the same substrate as 1.0, there are some key differences. We capture those differences and their implications for technical work in this paper. Our goal is to identify the primary differences leading to the properties of interest in 2.0 to be characterized. We identify novel challenges due to the different structures of Web 2.0 sites, richer methods of user interaction, new technologies, and fundamentally different philosophy. Although a significant amount of past work can be reapplied, some critical thinking is needed for the networking community to analyze the challenges of this new and rapidly evolving environment.
-
13 Jul 08
Alex Sandro GomesWeb 2.0 is a buzzword introduced in 2003–04 which is commonly used to encompass various novel phenomena on the World Wide Web. Although largely a marketing term, some of the key attributes associated with Web 2.0 include the growth of social networks, b
-
09 Jul 08
-
Francisco Arlindo AlvesThe ability to meet strangers and start meaningful exchanges and cooperation is sharply expanding. We may be entering a golden age of voluntary associations, what I called bourgeois anarchism.
-
08 Jul 08
-
07 Jul 08
-
04 Jul 08
alex yuby Graham Cormode and Balachander Krishnamurthy
First Monday, Volume 13 Number 6 - 2 June 2008 -
03 Jul 08
-
30 Jun 08
-
27 Jun 08
-
26 Jun 08
-
25 Jun 08
Joseph KrausFirst Monday article by Graham Cormode. Abstract -- Web 2.0 is a buzzword introduced in 2003–04 which is commonly used to encompass various novel phenomena on the World Wide Web
-
-
24 Jun 08
Barb PerlewitzWeb 2.0 is a buzzword introduced in 2003–04 which is commonly used to encompass various novel phenomena on the World Wide Web. Although largely a marketing term, some of the key attributes associated with Web 2.0 include the growth of social networks, b
-
23 Jun 08
-
20 Jun 08
-
At the outset we need to distinguish between the concepts of Web 2.0 and social networks. Web 2.0 is both a platform on which innovative technologies have been built and a space where users are treated as first class objects.
-
However, the essential difference between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 is that content creators were few in Web 1.0 with the vast majority of users simply acting as consumers of content, while any participant can be a content creator in Web 2.0 and numerous technological aids have been created to maximize the potential for content creation. The democratic nature of Web 2.0 is exemplified by creations of large number of niche groups (collections of friends) who can exchange content of any kind (text, audio, video) and tag, comment, and link to both intra–group and extra–group “pages.” A popular innovation in Web 2.0 is “mashups,” which combine or render content in novel forms. For example, street addresses present in a classified advertisement database are linked with a map Web site to visualize the locations. Such cross–site linkage captures the generic concept of creating additional links between records of any semi–structured database with another database.
-
Web sites which incorporate a strong social component, involving user profiles, friend links; Web sites which encourage user–generated content in the form of text, video, and photo postings along with comments, tags, and ratings; or just Web sites that have gained popularity in recent years and are subject to fevered speculations about valuations and IPO prospects. Nevertheless, these various categories have significant intersections, and so it is meaningful to talk broadly about the class of Web 2.0 sites without excessive ambiguity about which definition is being used (from now on, we use Web2 and Web1 respectively for brevity).
-
- Users as first class entities in the system, with prominent profile pages, including such features as: age, sex, location, testimonials, or comments about the user by other users.
- The ability to form connections between users, via links to other users who are “friends,” membership in “groups” of various kinds, and subscriptions or RSS feeds of “updates” from other users.
- The ability to post content in many forms: photos, videos, blogs, comments and ratings on other users’ content, tagging of own or others’ content, and some ability to control privacy and sharing.
- Other more technical features, including a public API to allow third–party enhancements and “mash–ups,” and embedding of various rich content types (e.g., Flash videos), and communication with other users through internal e–mail or IM systems.
Some of the important site features that mark out a Web2 site include the following:
-
Analysis of popular sites
-
-
-
19 Jun 08
Webtwo DozentWeb 2.0 is a buzzword introduced in 2003–04 which is commonly used to encompass various novel phenomena on the World Wide Web. Although largely a marketing term, some of the key attributes associated with Web 2.0 include the growth of social networks, bi–directional communication, various ‘glue’ technologies, and significant diversity in content types. We are not aware of a technical comparison between Web 1.0 and 2.0. While most of Web 2.0 runs on the same substrate as 1.0, there are some key differences. We capture those differences and their implications for technical work in this paper. Our goal is to identify the primary differences leading to the properties of interest in 2.0 to be characterized. We identify novel challenges due to the different structures of Web 2.0 sites, richer methods of user interaction, new technologies, and fundamentally different philosophy. Although a significant amount of past work can be reapplied, some critical thinking is needed for the networking community to analyze the challenges of this new and rapidly evolving environment.
-
18 Jun 08
-
Wilfred RubensThis paper presents an analysis of the structural, technological and functional innovations that jointly form Web 2.0. It catalogues the differences from Web 1.0 and presents a number of challenges for future research.
-
17 Jun 08
-
gccconlineAn article in the latest issue of First Monday on the
differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. -
Tania Shekokey differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0
2.0 analysis comparison culture ICT ideas information Library2.0 Literature media MySpace research science socialnetworking technology Web2.0 YouTube article
-
16 Jun 08
-
15 Jun 08
Page Comments
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.