This link has been bookmarked by 69 people . It was first bookmarked on 17 Aug 2006, by Ian Delaney.
-
28 Sep 11
-
04 May 09
-
05 Aug 08
-
have come to avoid talking about this stuff with people. The first question anyone asks me is “what is Web 2.0?” Unfortunately for the ensuing conversation, it’s a little tricky to provide a straight answer. Every time you find a neat expression for summing the whole Web 2.0 thing up, I immediately think of an exception, or three, or ways that the definition doesn’t really get us anywhere.
In the list that follows, I’ve taken a lot of these characteristics or definitions from Tim O’Reilly’s What is Web 2.0?, and also Paul Graham’s Web 2.0 and Jason Fried’s user survey about the term.
-
-
07 May 08
-
25 Mar 08
-
07 Mar 08
Clive McGounInteresting summary noting the difficulty of pinning down the notion of web 2.0
-
07 Feb 08
-
05 Dec 07
-
14 Sep 07
-
09 Aug 07
-
07 Aug 07
-
27 Jun 07
-
03 May 07
-
26 Dec 06
-
24 Dec 06
Julia Lesagerefining definitions here helps refine thinking about the subject; this is an excellent Internet use blog in general
culture definitions digital essays history theory Internetuse_blogs socialnetworking overviews Internet presentation
-
10 Dec 06
-
25 Nov 06
avivajazz jazzavivaCritical essay dissecting ten common definitions (attributions) for 'web 2.0.'
-
10 Nov 06
Kate TrgovacIan Delaney elaborates on 10 definitions of Web 2.0 .. some interesting points and summaries.
-
28 Oct 06
-
25 Oct 06
-
08 Oct 06
-
08 Sep 06
-
07 Sep 06
-
05 Sep 06
-
03 Sep 06
-
02 Sep 06
-
01 Sep 06
-
31 Aug 06
-
29 Aug 06
David WarlickI have come to avoid talking about this stuff with people. The first question anyone asks me is “what is Web 2.0?” Unfortunately for the ensuing conversation, it’s a little tricky to provide a straight answer. Every time you find a neat expressi
-
23 Aug 06
-
22 Aug 06
-
-
I have come to avoid talking about this stuff with people. The first question anyone asks me is âwhat is Web 2.0?â Unfortunately for the ensuing conversation, itâs a little tricky to provide a straight answer. Every time you find a neat expression for summing the whole Web 2.0 thing up, I immediately think of an exception, or three, or ways that the definition doesnât really get us anywhere.
-
-
Annelieske NoteboomThe correct answer is, of course, that Web 2.0 is a little of all of those definitions (as one commenter offers, the idea of trying for a definition at all may be misplaced, a la Wittgenstein). My own definition, if it could be called that, identifies the
-
21 Aug 06
-
-
20 Aug 06
-
19 Aug 06
-
-
18 Aug 06
-
17 Aug 06
Ian DelaneyI have come to avoid talking about this stuff with people. The first question anyone asks me is “what is Web 2.0?” Unfortunately for the ensuing conversation, it’s a little tricky to provide a straight answer. Every time you find a neat expression f
Page Comments
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.