David Corking on 2009-06-17
Sounds like a 2D version of Croquet and Open Cobalt.
This link has been bookmarked by 56 people . It was first bookmarked on 28 May 2009, by Carlos Santos.
-
25 Dec 09
-
13 Dec 09
-
13 Nov 09
-
What if we tried designing a communications system that took advantage of computers' current abilities, rather than imitating non-electronic forms?
-
-
22 Sep 09
-
19 Aug 09
-
07 Aug 09
Tomas ParkA "wave" is equal parts conversation and document, where people can communicate and work together with richly formatted text, photos, videos, maps, and more.
-
04 Aug 09
-
03 Aug 09
Linda McNeilhttp://wave.google.com/
google wave googlewave web2.0 web web 2.0 google wave walkabout
-
02 Aug 09
jordi guimIs very important for integration products and deceresse entropy system
-
blogs, wikis, collaborative documents, etc.
-
-
24 Jul 09
-
11 Jul 09
-
17 Jun 09
-
It's concurrent rich-text editing, where you see on your screen nearly instantly what your fellow collaborators are typing in your wave.
-
-
-
16 Jun 09
-
15 Jun 09
-
Here's how it works: In Google Wave you create a wave and add people to it. Everyone on your wave can use richly formatted text, photos, gadgets, and even feeds from other sources on the web. They can insert a reply or edit the wave directly. It's concurrent rich-text editing, where you see on your screen nearly instantly what your fellow collaborators are typing in your wave. That means Google Wave is just as well suited for quick messages as for persistent content — it allows for both collaboration and communication
-
-
10 Jun 09
-
09 Jun 09
-
The protocol is designed for open federation, such that anyone's Wave services can interoperate with each other and with the Google Wave service. To encourage adoption of the protocol, we intend to open source the code behind Google Wave.
-
Jez Cope on 2009-06-09
For me this will be the key to Wave's success or failure. If other providers do start up it will avoid vendor lock-in and potentially lead to much higher adoption. Companies (and individuals) which wouldn't consider outsourcing their communication to Google for all sorts of reasons would be much more likely to get on board if they can have the same functionality and global interoperability while still retaining control of their data.
-
-
-
08 Jun 09
-
-
Could a single communications model span all or most of the systems in use on the web today, in one smooth continuum? How simple could we make it?
-
-
05 Jun 09
-
04 Jun 09
koroghcm usAnnouncement with 1.5 hour video explaining/describing Google Wave which will be released sometime in 2009. It's hard to describe this but it might be thought of as an evolution in email to embrace the more social/collaborative aspects of web 2.0. It may have application in education and might be useful in one or more of my courses.
-
03 Jun 09
-
two of the most spectacular successes in digital communication, email and instant messaging, were originally designed in the '60s to imitate analog formats
-
Alexandre Enkerli on 2009-06-03
Goes well with Social Shaping (and Social Construction) of Technology. The "revolution" didn't happen simply because of IP.
-
-
-
02 Jun 09
-
Vipas SuktavornprasitA "wave" is equal parts conversation and document, where people can communicate and work together with richly formatted text, photos, videos, maps, and more.
-
01 Jun 09
-
Cole CampleseGoogle Wave has huge potential in teaching and learning. Will be worth our time to really understand it.
-
31 May 09
-
Went Walkabout. Brought back Google Wave
-
Max Ugaz on 2009-05-31
This post is very important to understand the vision behing Google Wave. We are not talking about a new product, we are talking about a bet for a methapor that would match the new paradigm of work.
-
Jez Cope on 2009-06-09
That's a really good way of looking at it. I wonder how long Google expects to wait before the bet pays off.
-
-
early 2004,
- 17 more annotations...
-
-
Where 2 Tech
-
become Google Maps
-
what might come next
-
Jens came up with the answer: communication
-
He pointed out that two of the most spectacular successes in digital communication, email and instant messaging, were originally designed in the '60s to imitate analog formats — email mimicked snail mail, and IM mimicked phone calls.
-
Since then, so many different forms of communication had been invented — blogs, wikis, collaborative documents, etc. — and computers and networks had dramatically improved. So Jens proposed a new communications model that presumed all these advances as a starting point
-
We started with a set of tough questions
-
Why do we have to live with divides between different types of communication
-
Max Ugaz on 2009-05-31
This is the key questions to be asked in a moment like this one: we have learned since the comercial internet appeared that we need a new paradigm to work, so we also need a new methapor borned out of the analog world.
-
Alexandre Enkerli on 2009-06-03
Agreed. It's all about integration. And seeing your annotation on this blogpost, right after watching the demo, makes me think about the connections between Diigo and GW. Diigo works (almost) anywhere. GW will require API support. But, as we saw in the Bloggy demo, there's an "annotated Web" dimension to GW.
- 1 more sticky notes...
-
-
Jez Cope on 2009-06-09
Wave has the potential to either kill off many other services, like Diigo, or incorporate them and take them to the next level. I strongly hope it's the latter, and the proliferation of Twitter-based services suggests there's a strong developer community out there who could take on this task.
-
-
-
Could a single communications model span all or most of the systems in use on the web today, in one smooth continuum? How simple could we make it?
-
What if we tried designing a communications system that took advantage of computers' current abilities, rather than imitating non-electronic forms?
-
A "wave" is equal parts conversation and document, where people can communicate and work together with richly formatted text, photos, videos, maps, and more
-
Max Ugaz on 2009-05-31
Precisely the new paradigm of work! no more individuals working alone with their muscles, now we work with our minds, helping each other in trying to get new and better ideas, at the speed of light, with people around the world, in a turbulent environment where only with the company of other we can accomplish our goals and make our vision possible.
-
Slickvisualp on 2009-06-30
I think all this "new paradigm" talk is a hoax. It is still the same as it ever was, just on a new platform. What all this does is diffusing the boundaries between the private- and the work-sphere. We write private mails while we should work and we work while we should spend time with our families.
-
-
In Google Wave you create a wave and add people to it
-
it allows for both collaboration and communication.
-
You can also use "playback" to rewind the wave and see how it evolved.
-
Max Ugaz on 2009-05-31
Notable feature that Google includes for documents, the versions are melted in time to become the evolution of the document. Nos the document lives.
-
-
we plan to make the code open source
-
Google Wave has three layers: the product, the platform, and the protocol
-
The protocol is designed for open federation, such that anyone's Wave services can interoperate with each other and with the Google Wave service.
-
-
-
30 May 09
-
Maylyn TanThe ultimate mash up tool. Collaborative web desktop, combining rich formatted text, photos, videos, chat and email where you can surf and create in your browser together
Google_Wave googlewave web2.0 Googletools google google wave
-
29 May 09
-
As always, Jens came up with the answer: communication. He pointed out that two of the most spectacular successes in digital communication, email and instant messaging, were originally designed in the '60s to imitate analog formats — email mimicked snail mail, and IM mimicked phone calls. Since then, so many different forms of communication had been invented — blogs, wikis, collaborative documents, etc. — and computers and networks had dramatically improved. So Jens proposed a new communications model that presumed all these advances as a starting point, and I was immediately sold. (Jens insists it took him hours to convince me, but I like my version better.)
-
- Why do we have to live with divides between different types of communication — email versus chat, or conversations versus documents?
- Could a single communications model span all or most of the systems in use on the web today, in one smooth continuum? How simple could we make it?
- What if we tried designing a communications system that took advantage of computers' current abilities, rather than imitating non-electronic forms?
-
-
-
28 May 09
-
Carlos SantosIn Google Wave you create a wave and add people to it. Everyone on your wave can use richly formatted text, photos, gadgets, and even feeds from other sources on the web. They can insert a reply or edit the wave directly. It's concurrent rich-text editing, where you see on your screen nearly instantly what your fellow collaborators are typing in your wave. That means Google Wave is just as well suited for quick messages as for persistent content — it allows for both collaboration and communication. You can also use "playback" to rewind the wave and see how it evolved.
Public Stiky Notes
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.