"Arguably, the only prophetic movement in the Church (broadly conceived) in the modern period has been Sophiology, which began in the late-sixteenth and early-seventeenth centuries with figures like Jacob Boehme, the Philadelphian Society, and William Law and has traces in German Romanticism and William Blake—all Protestants, by the way—then comes to full flower with the Russian sophiologists beginning with Solovyov in the late nineteenth century. From there, after having been forgotten, it spread again to the West and re-emerged in Catholic thinkers such as Hans Urs von Balthasar, Louis Bouyer, and Thomas Merton. In that, Sophiology is an inherently ecumenical phenomenon—and not the false ecumenism often paraded before us as a kind of superficial bonhomie that never leads to anything other than cringe-worthy handholding around a bonfire within which burns all semblance of Christian authenticity. Clearly, this ecumenism inspired by the sophianic is what Solovyov envisions at the end of A Short Story of the Anti-Christ—which he contrasts with the false ecumenism of Christian unity (and of Tolstoy) under the aegis of the Anti-Christ. After the remnant of true Christians gathers in the desert, they are granted a vision: “But the nocturnal darkness was suddenly illuminated with brilliant light and a great sign appeared in the heavens; it was a woman, clothed with the sun with the moon beneath her feet and a wreath of twelve stars on her head.”[5] Solovyov’s vision here is unapologetically biblical. Bulgakov continues this sophiological exegesis of the Apocalypse with a more explicit declaration: “The new Jerusalem is Divine Sophia rendering all creation transparent, shining out in created Sophia.”[6]
People often ask me what the warrant for Sophiology could be, given that it seems to be absent from most of the Fathers and most of “official” Church history. On the one hand, I think we are the unwitting victims of an interpretive tradition that turns Holy Tradition—whether East or West—into an idol. And in that tradition, the only way to read “Sophia” is as the Logos—and once such a commitment is accepted, no matter how erroneous or inexact, it is difficult to break its dogmatic spell. A simple, phenomenological reading of scripture, as I tried to show earlier in regards to σκηνη, can break one out of such an enchantment. But this is only one manner of revelation. The other is through mystical encounter. This combination of a clean, phenomenological reading of scripture companioned by personal experience seems to be what happened with Boehme (and others), was definitely the case with Solovyov and was also what informed (and formed) Bulgakov and Florensky. As Florensky writes in the very first sentence of The Pillar and Ground of the Truth, “Living religious experience as the sole legitimate way to gain knowledge of the dogmas—that is how I would like to express the general theme of my book.”[7] His attention to the epoché in that amazing book offers us a method by which this state is realized.
Sophia, the submerged reality as I have argued for more than the past decade, lies in hiding, as it were, awaiting discovery. We see resonances of this in the Gnostic mythos of Sophia’s exile or sleep. But we are the ones who are in exile; we are the ones asleep. One could compare the disclosure of the sophianic nature of Creation—and of the Church—to the disclosure of the laws of mathematics. Those laws were always there; they simply required individuals equipped—by nature, by historical process, most of all by curiosity—to find them.
My own belief is that the full disclosure of the sophianic and its illumination of the Church is still to come, and that this disclosure is part of the active eschatology heralded by Berdyaev—which, of course, suggests that the revelation of scripture is still incomplete (whereas a passive eschatology would think it complete). The sophianization of the cosmos is integral to this active eschatology, and it is not a passive event. As Berdyaev writes, “My salvation is bound up with that not only of other men but also of animals, plants, minerals, of every blade of grass—all must be transfigured and brought into the Kingdom of God. And this depends upon my creative efforts.”"
Shared by Michel Bauwens, like and 1 save total