Shared by Hans De Keulenaer, 1 save total
For some people, questioning comes easily. Their natural inquisitiveness, emotional intelligence, and ability to read people put the ideal question on the tip of their tongue. But most of us don’t ask enough questions, nor do we pose our inquiries in an optimal way.
Shared by Hans De Keulenaer, 1 save total
Shared by Hans De Keulenaer, 1 save total
We support our customers with the development and manufacturing of high thermal and electrical conductivity components like: Heat dissipation and exchange components; cool plates, heat sinks, heat pipes, heat exchangers, CPU and datacenter cooling devices, conformal cooling mold inserts, etc. * Electrical conductivity components; induction coils, EV motor windings, electromagnetic coils, waveguides, and antennas, etc. * Space propulsion systems; rocket engines components
Shared by Hans De Keulenaer, 1 save total
Story behind the 19-ton native copper block, discovered at the bottom of Lake Superior and now on display at the A.E> Seaman Mineral Museum.
Shared by Hans De Keulenaer, 1 save total
"Next Monday, the third major antitrust trial against Google starts, this one on the software plumbing underlying online display advertising. Because of your willingness to subscribe to BIG, I have the money to hire someone to cover the trial, as we did with the search trial. Our new writer is a lawyer named Tom Blakely, and he’ll be writing updates at our special site, BigTechOnTrial.com. You can sign up there for updates, and if you’d like to support this work, please consider joining as a paid subscriber.
But the context for this trial is very different than the first search trial. The reason is simple. Twice now Google has been ruled to be an unlawful monopoly. The first case involved its control of the Android app store in its fight with Epic Games, and the second was over its search monopoly in its tussle with the government. Moreover, in both trials, the judges have found Google to act in bad faith with its treatment of documents."
Shared by Paul Merrell, 2 saves total
Shared by Paul Merrell, 1 save total
On Wednesday, a three-judge federal appeals court panel upheld an earlier ruling in favor of major book publishers and found that the Internet Archive was guilty of violating copyright law by scanning books and lending them to the public for free.
In its 64-page decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Manhattan ruled in favor of the lawsuit filed in 2020 by four of the 10 largest book publishers in the world against the San Francisco-based nonprofit Internet Archive and its Open Library project.
Diigo is about better ways to research, share and collaborate on information. Learn more »
Join Diigo