Skip to main contentdfsdf

Joseph Kraus

SPARC Statement on GAO Report GAO-26-107738: Federal Research Publishing Costs May 2026 - SPARC

The federal government has one obligation in public access policy: ensure that taxpayers can access the results of the research they paid for. The government does not have an obligation to promote policies that ensure commercial publishers maintain a specific business model in the process. This report conflates public access with pay-to-publish, treating the current commercial publisher business model as an unchangeable feature of scholarly communication rather than what it is: one optional business arrangement among many alternatives.

Shared by Joseph Kraus, 1 save total

Joseph Kraus

May 2026: Federal Research: Agencies Should Better Manage Anticipated Publishing Cost Increases Amid Shift to Public Access | U.S. GAO

In 2022 The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) directed federal agencies to make research results freely accessible to the public immediately when published. In response, seven of the nine agencies GAO reviewed issued updated plans or policies. The Department of Transportation and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission were still drafting updated plans and policies at the time of our review. Five agencies’ plans or policies fully met OSTP’s guidance. The National Science Foundation’s and U.S. Department of Agriculture’s plans did not fully address OSTP’s guidance for reuse rights. These rights describe how others can share, modify, or use the research. Better alignment with OSTP’s guidance could help ensure this research can be built upon by others.

Amid the federal shift to public access, publishers are changing their business models to remain viable without subscription revenue and will require authors to pay to have their publications made open access. Agencies allow grant funds to cover these charges. Assuming historical patterns continue, the new policies and publishers' responses may result in significant agency cost growth. This would mean less money for research (see figure). However, only the National Institutes of Health has planned to manage these potential costs. Additional analysis could help other agencies better manage costs, which may triple annually.

Shared by Joseph Kraus, 1 save total

Joseph Kraus

"Journal Evaluation Workflow" by Karen Burton

This workflow document will walk you through the process of evaluating if a journal is predatory.

Shared by Joseph Kraus, 1 save total

Joseph Kraus

Object Interaction Lab - Citation hallucination checker

How it works: This tool uses a Dual-Engine Search. It first queries CrossRef. If it fails, it searches Semantic Scholar (which indexes 200M+ papers including books and preprints). 100% Private & Secure: All text extraction and verification math happens locally in your web browser. Absolutely no data is sent to ChatGPT or any AI models.

Shared by Joseph Kraus, 3 saves total

Joseph Kraus

Book - The complete guide to institutional repositories - Chapter 11 - Crafting an institutional repository policy / Rebekah Kati

"Starting an institutional repository / Leo Stezano -- Communicating value and building relationships / Harrison Inefuku -- Integrating publisher policies and institutional repository workflows / Ian Harmon and Mariya Maistrovskaya -- The deposit policy: balancing content goals and ingest control / David B. Lowe and Charity K.M. Stokes -- Name authority control in repositories / Charity K.M. Stokes and David B. Lowe -- Identifying policy trends in institutional repositories / Christy Shorey and Erin Jerome -- Undergraduate student work in the institutional repository / Stephanie Davis-Kahl -- Staffing and workflow for institutional repositories / Stephen Craig Finlay -- Creating metadata for institutional repositories / Scott Opasik -- Copyright and institutional repositories / Benjamin Keele -- Crafting an institutional repository policy / Rebekah Kati -- Creating and implementing an open-access policy: a European perspective / David Ball -- Testing open-source institutional repository software / Amy Leigh Allen -- A digital project as community outreach: A new way of approaching metadata / Patricia M. Dragon, Amanda Vinogradov, Heather M. White -- Faculty outreach with the Content Liberation Project / Jennifer Solomon and Rebekah Kati. Summary "This guide to institutional repositories is suitable for those implementing new IR programs or overseeing a maturing program, librarians who find themselves with added IR responsibilities, and new librarians seeking to enter the job market"-- Provided by publisher."

Shared by Joseph Kraus, 1 save total

Joseph Kraus

Trust Is Not an Academic Value: Mistakes of the Yale Report

"Fools imagine that trust in higher education can be rebuilt by bowing down to right-wing demands, firing leftists, suppressing free speech and installing conservatives into faculty and administrative positions based on their politics rather than merit. Obedience to repression will only turn colleges into political pawns of the far right and undermine what little support they have left.

Universities can build support for academia by rejecting trust and embracing its opposite: a culture of debate, verification, dissent, dispute and distrust."

Shared by Joseph Kraus, 1 save total

Joseph Kraus

BBC World Service - The Documentary, Back to books: Sweden’s digital backlash

"Why tech-savvy Sweden is ditching screens for books and pens in its schools."

Shared by Joseph Kraus, 1 save total

Joseph Kraus

Emanuel | Making Your Repository (More) Accessible | Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication

"As colleges and universities make increasing and overdue efforts under the auspices of access, equity, and inclusion to make their resources accessible to all users, these efforts must extend to the institution’s online presence, including its institutional repository. IR managers must first ask what “accessible” means for compliance with university policies as well as the Americans with Disability Act (ADA), immediately followed by plans for both remediating existing content and imposing best practices on new content, amid current workflows and budgetary restraints."

Shared by Joseph Kraus, 1 save total

Joseph Kraus

Medical Institutional Repositories in Libraries (MIRL) Symposium: Clearing the Hurdles: Strategies for Accessibility Remediation in a Digital Repository

"In July 2024, a new accessibility law in Colorado took effect, which requires state and government agencies—including libraries—to make their digital content accessible to users with disabilities. Recognizing that digital accessibility is both a legal obligation and a fundamental part of equitable access to information, the Strauss Library at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus developed a step-by-step remediation plan to bring its institutional repository into compliance. The project began by rewriting outdated accessibility policies, then transitioned towards assessing collections, setting priorities, and developing workflows to remediate inaccessible files. This presentation will outline the strategic approach the library adopted despite limited staff time and expertise. It will also share the challenges encountered and successes achieved as well as highlight lessons learned. Attendees will take away practical strategies that can be adapted by other organizations seeking to strengthen accessibility in their own digital repositories, regardless of size or resources."

Shared by Joseph Kraus, 1 save total

Show more items

Diigo is about better ways to research, share and collaborate on information. Learn more »

Join Diigo