GitHub - simplifaisoul/osiris: Open Source Global Intelligence Platform - Real-Time OSINT Dashboard - A Palantir Alternative - We Get 0.5% on Volume Traded 2nZNHm3Lr9umG3DVrzYwHgktwkuKuJRXqqRqs3ewpump · GitHub

Shared by Olivier Le Deuff, like and 4 saves total

yopaseopor/traffic_signs_map: Map of the most located traffic signs in the World via OSM data.

Shared by Jean-Louis ZIMMERMANN, like and 1 save total

Don't Outsource Agentic Capability Design - by Lee Bryant

Shared by Bertrand Duperrin, like and 1 save total

Engineering the Spatial Foundation for FSQ OS Places — Part 2 | Foursquare

Shared by Jean-Louis ZIMMERMANN, like and 1 save total

OnRouteMap | Trouvez des POIs le long de votre itinéraire

Shared by Jean-Louis ZIMMERMANN, like and 1 save total

Prompt: Anthropic's IPO Filing Signals AI's Next Phase

"The next chapter of AI could depend less on breakthrough models and more on the resources required to build and sustain them.

"

Shared by Bertrand Duperrin, Bertrand Duperrin added annotation, like and 1 save total

The move signals that AI is evolving from a market defined by venture funding, breakthrough models and rapid experimentation into one increasingly shaped by public markets, infrastructure investments and demands for sustainable growth.
Anthropic's filing suggests the industry may be entering a new phase in which investors, customers and regulators begin asking different questions about revenue, profitability, infrastructure requirements and long-term business viability.
This week, Alphabet revealed plans to raise as much as $80 billion to expand its AI infrastructure,
Meanwhile, SoftBank committed to investing $87.3 billion for AI infrastructure in France,
Taken together, these developments suggest the AI industry is becoming less defined by individual model releases and more by the economic realities required to support them.
AI is no longer behaving like an emerging technology sector. Increasingly, it looks like an industry entering its next stage of maturity, one in which financial performance, infrastructure investment and operational execution matter as much as technological breakthroughs.

4 more annotations...

AI Is Not Intelligence Architecture - Bloor Research

"Everyone is talking about AI. Vendors are selling it. Enterprises are buying it. Boards are governing it. And almost without exception, all three are having the conversation at the wrong level.

"

Shared by Bertrand Duperrin, Bertrand Duperrin added annotation, like and 1 save total

AI is a tool. That is not a criticism. Tools matter. But tools do not compound. Tools do not govern themselves. Tools do not produce structural advantage simply by being deployed.
The organisations that will define the competitive landscape through the rest of this decade are not asking whether they have AI. They are asking whether they have an Intelligence Architecture (IA).
AI is the capability. Intelligence Architecture is the system that makes the capability count.
AI asks: what can this capability do? IA asks: how is intelligence structured, governed, and compounded across the organisation over time? One question produces a tool. The other produces a structural asset.
The capability was never architecturally embedded. The intelligence was never captured, preserved, or owned. There is no memory, no governance layer, no compounding. That is not an AI problem. That is an architecture problem.
Most organisations are buying intelligence while leaving memory behind
That gap – between acquired capability and architectural foundation — is where the competitive advantage of the next decade will be won or lost.
Because organisations are discoverin that deploying intelligence and governing intelligence are fundamentally different challenges -and that the gap between them is where value is lost.
The next question is not whether organisations will build Intelligence Architectures. The next question is what those architectures are built from — and who owns them.

7 more annotations...