This link has been bookmarked by 13 people . It was first bookmarked on 10 Jun 2008, by Wade Roush.
-
31 Oct 09
-
04 Sep 08
-
03 Aug 08
-
13 Jul 08
Conventional thinking seriously underestimates the risk of space-rock earth strikes, which some experts say may be as high as one in 10. Gregg Easterbrook explores why NASA isn't trying harder to prevent catastrophe. Annotated link http://www.diigo.com/b
gregg_easterbrook space-rock_threat the_atlantic paradoxes delicious_import
-
24 Jun 08
-
13 Jun 08
-
11 Jun 08
-
The odds that a potentially devastating space rock will hit Earth this century may be as high as one in 10. So why isn’t NASA trying harder to prevent catastrophe?
-
-
10 Jun 08
-
Only in the past few decades have astronomers begun to search the nearby skies for objects such as asteroids and comets (for convenience, let’s call them “space rocks”). What they are finding suggests that near-Earth space rocks are more numerous than was once thought, and that their orbits may not be as stable as has been assumed. There is also reason to think that space rocks may not even need to reach Earth’s surface to cause cataclysmic damage. Our solar system appears to be a far more dangerous place than was previously believed.
-
-
31 May 08
-
23 May 08
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.