This link has been bookmarked by 81 people . It was first bookmarked on 14 Jan 2008, by someone privately.
-
26 Mar 18
Professor Doyle"the critical realist is critical of our ability to know reality with certainty. Where the positivist believed that the goal of science was to uncover the truth, the post-positivist critical realist believes that the goal of science is to hold steadfastly to the goal of getting it right about reality, even though we can never achieve that goal! Because all measurement is fallible, the post-positivist "
-
the critical realist is critical of our ability to know reality with certainty. Where the positivist believed that the goal of science was to uncover the truth, the post-positivist critical realist believes that the goal of science is to hold steadfastly to the goal of getting it right about reality, even though we can never achieve that goal! Because all measurement is fallible, the post-positivist
-
emphasizes the importance of multiple measures and observations, each of which may possess different types of error, and the need to use triangulation across these multiple errorful sources to try to get a better bead on what's happening in reality. The post-positivist also believes that all observations are theory-laden and that scientists
-
are inherently biased by their cultural experiences, world views, and so on
-
Most post-positivists are constructivists who believe that we each construct our view of the world based on our perceptions of it
-
Positivists believed that objectivity was a characteristic that resided in the individual scientist
-
Post-positivists reject the idea that any individual can see the world perfectly as it really is. We are all biased and all of our observations are affected (theory-laden). Our best hope for achieving objectivity is to triangulate across multiple fallible perspectives! Thus, objectivity is not the characteristic of an individual, it is inherently a social phenomenon
-
The best way for us to improve the objectivity of what we do is to do it within the context of a broader contentious community of truth-seekers (including other scientists) who criticize each other's work.
-
sometimes called the natural selection theory of knowledge
-
-
25 Sep 17
-
18 Jan 17
-
06 Nov 16
-
epistemology is the philosophy of knowledge or of how we come to know
-
Methodology is also concerned with how we come to know, but is much more practical in nature.
-
Methodology is focused on the specific ways -- the methods -- that we can use to try to understand our world better
-
Epistemology and methodology are intimately related: the former involves the philosophy of how we come to know the world and the latter involves the practice.
-
A lot of our stereotypes about science come from a period where science was dominated by a particular philosophy -- positivism -- that tended to support some of these views. Here, I want to suggest (no matter what the movie industry may think) that science has moved on in its thinking into an era of post-positivism where many of those stereotypes of the scientist no longer hold up.
-
In its broadest sense, positivism is a rejection of metaphysics
-
It is a position that holds that the goal of knowledge is simply to describe the phenomena that we experience.
-
The purpose of science is simply to stick to what we can observe and measure.
-
Knowledge of anything beyond that, a positivist would hold, is impossible
-
In a positivist view of the world, science was seen as the way to get at truth, to understand the world well enough so that we might predict and control it.
-
post-positivism is a wholesale rejection of the central tenets of positivism.
-
One of the most common forms of post-positivism is a philosophy called critical realism
-
A critical realist believes that there is a reality independent of our thinking about it that science can study.
-
(This is in contrast with a subjectivist who would hold that there is no external reality -- we're each making this all up!)
-
Positivists were also realists. The difference is that the post-positivist critical realist recognizes that all observation is fallible and has error and that all theory is revisable.
-
In other words, the critical realist is critical of our ability to know reality with certainty
-
-
09 Jul 16
jhitzges1"Let's start our very brief discussion of philosophy of science with a simple distinction between epistemology and methodology. The term epistemology comes from the Greek word epistêmê, their term for knowledge. In simple terms, epistemology is the philosophy of knowledge or of how we come to know. Methodology is also concerned with how we come to know, but is much more practical in nature. Methodology is focused on the specific ways -- the methods -- that we can use to try to understand our world better. Epistemology and methodology are intimately related: the former involves the philosophy of how we come to know the world and the latter involves the practice."
-
Let's start our very brief discussion of philosophy of science with a simple distinction between epistemology and methodology. The term epistemology comes from the Greek word epistêmê, their term for knowledge. In simple terms, epistemology is the philosophy of knowledge or of how we come to know. Methodology is also concerned with how we come to know, but is much more practical in nature. Methodology is focused on the specific ways -- the methods -- that we can use to try to understand our world better. Epistemology and methodology are intimately related: the former involves the philosophy of how we come to know the world and the latter involves the practice.
-
The purpose of science is simply to stick to what we can observe and measure.
-
B.F. Skinner argued that psychology needed to concentrate only on the positive and negative reinforcers of behavior
-
post-positivism is a wholesale rejection of the central tenets of positivism.
-
post-positivist critical realist recognizes that all observation is fallible and has error and that all theory is revisable
-
he goal of science is to hold steadfastly to the goal of getting it right about reality, even though we can never achieve that goal!
-
Most post-positivists are constructivists who believe that we each construct our view of the world based on our perceptions of it.
-
Scientists are responsible for putting aside their biases and beliefs and seeing the world as it 'really' is.
-
-
29 Jun 16
-
The term epistemology comes from the Greek word epistêmê, their term for knowledge. In simple terms, epistemology is the philosophy of knowledge or of how we come to know.
-
Methodology is focused on the specific ways -- the methods -- that we can use to try to understand our world better.
-
positivism
-
t is a position that holds that the goal of knowledge is simply to describe the phenomena that we experience. The purpose of science is simply to stick to what we can observe and measure.
-
In a positivist view of the world, science was seen as the way to get at truth, to understand the world well enough so that we might predict and control it.
-
empiricism -- the idea that observation and measurement was the core of the scientific endeavor.
-
A post-positivist might begin by recognizing that the way scientists think and work and the way we think in our everyday life are not distinctly different.
-
A critical realist believes that there is a reality independent of our thinking about it that science can study.
-
he positivist believed that the goal of science was to uncover the truth, the post-positivist critical realist believes that the goal of science is to hold steadfastly to the goal of getting it right about reality, even though we can never achieve that goal!
-
Because all measurement is fallible, the post-positivist emphasizes the importance of multiple measures and observations, each of which may possess different types of error, and the need to use triangulation across these multiple errorful sources to try to get a better bead on what's happening in reality.
-
he post-positivist also believes that all observations are theory-laden and that scientists (and everyone else, for that matter) are inherently biased by their cultural experiences, world views, and so on. This is not cause to give up in despair, however.
-
So what is meant by objectivity in a post-positivist world? Positivists believed that objectivity was a characteristic that resided in the individual scientist. Scientists are responsible for putting aside their biases and beliefs and seeing the world as it 'really' is. Post-positivists reject the idea that any individual can see the world perfectly as it really is.
-
Our best hope for achieving objectivity is to triangulate across multiple fallible perspectives!
-
Thus, objectivity is not the characteristic of an individual, it is inherently a social phenomenon.
-
t is what multiple individuals are trying to achieve when they criticize each other's work.
-
-
06 Mar 16
-
The positivist believed in empiricism -- the idea that observation and measurement was the core of the scientific endeavor.
-
A post-positivist might begin by recognizing that the way scientists think and work and the way we think in our everyday life are not distinctly different. Scientific reasoning and common sense reasoning are essentially the same process. There is no difference in kind between the two, only a difference in degree.
-
Most post-positivists are constructivists who believe that we each construct our view of the world based on our perceptions of
-
-
20 Dec 15
-
A lot of our stereotypes about science come from a period where science was dominated by a particular philosophy -- positivism -- that tended to support some of these views
-
post-positivism where many of those stereotypes of the scientist no longer hold up.
-
positivism is a rejection of metaphysics
-
It is a position that holds that the goal of knowledge is simply to describe the phenomena that we experience. The purpose of science is simply to stick to what we can observe and measure. Knowledge of anything beyond that, a positivist would hold, is impossible.
-
In a positivist view of the world, science was seen as the way to get at truth, to understand the world well enough so that we might predict and control it.
-
One of the most common forms of post-positivism is a philosophy called critical realism. A critical realist believes that there is a reality independent of our thinking about it that science can study
-
subjectivist who would hold that there is no external reality -- we're each making this all up
-
-
16 Dec 15
-
The difference is that the post-positivist critical realist recognizes that all observation is fallible and has error and that all theory is revisable
-
A critical realist believes that there is a reality independent of our thinking about it that science can study.
-
epistemology is the philosophy of knowledge or of how we come to know
-
Methodology is focused on the specific ways -- the methods -- that we can use to try to understand our world better.
-
It is a position that holds that the goal of knowledge is simply to describe the phenomena that we experience. The purpose of science is simply to stick to what we can observe and measure.
-
-
25 Oct 15
-
Most post-positivists are constructivists who believe that we each construct our view of the world based on our perceptions of it. Because perception and observation is fallible, our constructions must be imperfect.
-
-
06 Sep 15
-
epistemology is the philosophy of knowledge or of how we come to know
-
Methodology is focused on the specific ways -- the methods -- that we can use to try to understand our world better
-
Epistemology and methodology are intimately related: the former involves the philosophy of how we come to know the world and the latter involves the practice.
-
It is a position that holds that the goal of knowledge is simply to describe the phenomena that we experience. The purpose of science is simply to stick to what we can observe and measure. Knowledge of anything beyond that, a positivist would hold, is impossible.
-
In a positivist view of the world, science was seen as the way to get at truth, to understand the world well enough so that we might predict and control it.
-
The world and the universe were deterministic -- they operated by laws of cause and effect that we could discern if we applied the unique approach of the scientific method.
-
A post-positivist might begin by recognizing that the way scientists think and work and the way we think in our everyday life are not distinctly different.
-
Scientific reasoning and common sense reasoning are essentially the same process. There is no difference in kind between the two, only a difference in degree.
-
A critical realist believes that there is a reality independent of our thinking about it that science can study.
-
a subjectivist who would hold that there is no external reality -- we're each making this all up!
-
The difference is that the post-positivist critical realist recognizes that all observation is fallible and has error and that all theory is revisable.
-
the critical realist is critical of our ability to know reality with certainty
-
Where the positivist believed that the goal of science was to uncover the truth, the post-positivist critical realist believes that the goal of science is to hold steadfastly to the goal of getting it right about reality, even though we can never achieve that goal!
-
triangulation
-
post-positivism rejects the relativist idea of the incommensurability of different perspectives, the idea that we can never understand each other because we come from different experiences and cultures.
-
Most post-positivists are constructivists who believe that we each construct our view of the world based on our perceptions of it.
-
-
29 Jun 15
-
19 Jun 15
-
01 Mar 15
-
positivism is a rejection of metaphysics
-
the goal of knowledge is simply to describe the phenomena that we experience
-
It is a position that holds
-
The purpose of science is simply to stick to what we can observe and measure
-
Knowledge of anything beyond that, a positivist would hold, is impossible
-
psychology could only study what could be directly observed and measured
-
science was seen as the way to get at truth, to understand the world well enough so that we might predict and control it
-
they operated by laws of cause and effect that we could discern if we applied the unique approach of the scientific method.
-
We use deductive reasoning to postulate theories that we can test
-
we may learn that our theory doesn't fit the facts well and so we need to revise our theory to better predict reality
-
the experiment, the attempt to discern natural laws through direct manipulation and observation.
-
recognizing that the way scientists think and work and the way we think in our everyday life are not distinctly different
-
-
23 Feb 15
-
14 Feb 15
-
Positivism & Post-Positivism
-
One of the most common forms of post-positivism is a philosophy called critical realism. A critical realist believes that there is a reality independent of our thinking about it that science can study.
-
The difference is that the post-positivist critical realist recognizes that all observation is fallible and has error and that all theory is revisable. In other words, the critical realist is critical of our ability to know reality with certainty. Where the positivist believed that the goal of science was to uncover the truth, the post-positivist critical realist believes that the goal of science is to hold steadfastly to the goal of getting it right about reality, even though we can never achieve that goal! Because all measurement is fallible, the post-positivist emphasizes the importance of multiple measures and observations, each of which may possess different types of error, and the need to use triangulation across these multiple errorful sources to try to get a better bead on what's happening in reality.
-
The post-positivist also believes that all observations are theory-laden and that scientists (and everyone else, for that matter) are inherently biased by their cultural experiences, world views, and so on.
-
-
13 Feb 15
-
post-positivist critical realist recognizes that all observation is fallible and has error and that all theory is revisable. In other words, the critical realist is critical of our ability to know reality with certainty
-
he post-positivist critical realist believes that the goal of science is to hold steadfastly to the goal of getting it right about reality, even though we can never achieve that goal!
-
triangulation
-
post-positivism rejects the relativist idea of the incommensurability of different perspectives, the idea that we can never understand each other because we come from different experiences and cultures.
-
ost post-positivists are constructivists
-
-
11 Oct 14
-
The positivist believed in empiricism -- the idea that observation and measurement was the core of the scientific endeavor. The key approach of the scientific method is the experiment, the attempt to discern natural laws through direct manipulation and observation
-
One of the most common forms of post-positivism is a philosophy called critical realism. A critical realist believes that there is a reality independent of our thinking about it that science can study. (This is in contrast with a subjectivist who would hold that there is no external reality -- we're each making this all up!). Positivists were also realists. The difference is that the post-positivist critical realist recognizes that all observation is fallible and has error and that all theory is revisable. In other words, the critical realist is critical of our ability to know reality with certainty. Where the positivist believed that the goal of science was to uncover the truth, the post-positivist critical realist believes that the goal of science is to hold steadfastly to the goal of getting it right about reality, even though we can never achieve that goal!
-
-
02 Oct 14
-
23 Sep 14
-
16 Sep 14
-
positivism
-
simply to describe the phenomena that we experience. The purpose of science is simply to stick to what we can observe and measure
-
behaviorists
-
post-positivism
-
the way scientists think and work and the way we think in our everyday life are not distinctly different
-
critical realism. A critical realist believes that there is a reality independent of our thinking about it that science can study. (
-
all observation is fallible and has error and that all theory is revisable
-
Where the positivist believed that the goal of science was to uncover the truth, the post-positivist critical realist believes that the goal of science is to hold steadfastly to the goal of getting it right about reality, even though we can never achieve that goal!
-
triangulation
-
We are all biased and all of our observations are affected (theory-laden). Our best hope for achieving objectivity is to triangulate across multiple fallible perspectives!
-
-
25 Jul 13
-
23 Jul 13
-
24 Jun 13
-
former involves the philosophy of how we come to know the world and the latter involves the practice.
-
It is a position that holds that the goal of knowledge is simply to describe the phenomena that we experience.
-
The purpose of science is simply to stick to what we can observe and measure. Knowledge of anything beyond that, a positivist would hold, is impossible.
-
In a positivist view of the world, science was seen as the way to get at truth, to understand the world well enough so that we might predict and control it. The world and the universe were deterministic -- they operated by laws of cause and effect that we could discern if we applied the unique approach of the scientific method.
-
positivist believed in empiricism -- the idea that observation and measurement was the core of the scientific endeavor. The key approach of the scientific method is the experiment, the attempt to discern natural laws through direct manipulation and observation.
-
post-positivism is a wholesale rejection of the central tenets of positivism
-
Scientific reasoning and common sense reasoning are essentially the same process. There is no difference in kind between the two, only a difference in degree. Scientists, for example, follow specific procedures to assure that observations are verifiable, accurate and consistent. In everyday reasoning, we don't always proceed so carefully
-
critical realism. A critical realist believes that there is a reality independent of our thinking about it that science can study. (This is in contrast with a subjectivist who would hold that there is no external reality -- we're each making this all up
-
Where the positivist believed that the goal of science was to uncover the truth, the post-positivist critical realist believes that the goal of science is to hold steadfastly to the goal of getting it right about reality, even though we can never achieve that goal
-
post-positivism rejects the relativist idea of the incommensurability of different perspectives, the idea that we can never understand each other because we come from different experiences and cultures. Most post-positivists are constructivists who believe that we each construct our view of the world based on our perceptions of it. Because perception and observation is fallible, our constructions must be imperfect
-
Post-positivists reject the idea that any individual can see the world perfectly as it really is. We are all biased and all of our observations are affected (theory-laden). Our best hope for achieving objectivity is to triangulate across multiple fallible perspectives! Thus, objectivity is not the characteristic of an individual, it is inherently a social phenomenon.
-
theories that survive such intense scrutiny are a bit like the species that survive in the evolutionary struggle. (This is sometimes called the natural selection theory of knowledge
-
-
17 Apr 13
-
05 Mar 13
-
08 Jan 13
Tammy Gedak"ethodology is focused on the specific ways -- the methods -- that we can use to try to understand our world better. "
-
ethodology is also concerned with how we come to know, but is much more practical in nature. Methodology is focused on the specific ways -- the methods -- that we can use to try to understand our world better.
-
ositivism is. In its broadest sense, positivism is a rejection of metaphysics
-
osition that holds that the goal of knowledge is simply to describe the phenomena that we experience
-
post-positivism is a wholesale rejection of the central tenets of positivism.
-
A critical realist believes that there is a reality independent of our thinking
-
post-positivist critical realist recognizes that all observation is fallible and has error and that all theory is revisable.
-
he post-positivist also believes that all observations are theory-laden and that scientists (and everyone else, for that matter) are inherently biased by their cultural experiences, world views, and so on.
-
-
11 Dec 12
-
23 Jul 12
-
06 May 12
-
28 Apr 12
-
post-positivism is a wholesale rejection of the central tenets of positivism
-
post-positivist critical realist recognizes that all observation is fallible and has error and that all theory is revisable
-
Because all measurement is fallible, the post-positivist emphasizes the importance of multiple measures and observations, each of which may possess different types of error, and the need to use triangulation across these multiple errorful sources to try to get a better bead on what's happening in reality. The post-positivist also believes that all observations are theory-laden and that scientists (and everyone else, for that matter) are inherently biased by their cultural experiences, world views, and so on.
-
post-positivism rejects the relativist idea of the incommensurability of different perspectives, the idea that we can never understand each other because we come from different experiences and cultures. Most post-positivists are constructivists who believe that we each construct our view of the world based on our perceptions of it.
-
-
05 Feb 12
Michelle Torrise" The post-positivist also believes that all observations are theory-laden and that scientists (and everyone else, for that matter) are inherently biased by their cultural experiences, world views, and so on. This is not cause to give up in despair, however. Just because I have my world view based on my experiences and you have yours doesn't mean that we can't hope to translate from each other's experiences or understand each other. That is, post-positivism rejects the relativist idea of the incommensurability of different perspectives, the idea that we can never understand each other because we come from different experiences and cultures. Most post-positivists are constructivists who believe that we each construct our view of the world based on our perceptions of it. Because perception and observation is fallible, our constructions must be imperfect. So what is meant by objectivity in a post-positivist world? Positivists believed that objectivity was a characteristic that resided in the individual scientist. Scientists are responsible for putting aside their biases and beliefs and seeing the world as it 'really' is. Post-positivists reject the idea that any individual can see the world perfectly as it really is. We are all biased and all of our observations are affected (theory-laden). Our best hope for achieving objectivity is to triangulate across multiple fallible perspectives! Thus, objectivity is not the characteristic of an individual, it is inherently a social phenomenon. It is what multiple individuals are trying to achieve when they criticize each other's work. We never achieve objectivity perfectly, but we can approach it. The best way for us to improve the objectivity of what we do is to do it within the context of a broader contentious community of truth-seekers (including other scientists) who criticize each other's work. The theories that survive such intense scrutiny are a bit like the species that survive in the evolutionary struggle. (This is sometimes called the natural selection theory of knowledge and holds that ideas have 'survival value' and that knowledge evolves through a process of variation, selection and retention). They have adaptive value and are probably as close as our species can come to being objective and understanding reality."
-
The post-positivist also believes that all observations are theory-laden and that scientists (and everyone else, for that matter) are inherently biased by their cultural experiences, world views, and so on. This is not cause to give up in despair, however. Just because I have my world view based on my experiences and you have yours doesn't mean that we can't hope to translate from each other's experiences or understand each other. That is, post-positivism rejects the relativist idea of the incommensurability of different perspectives, the idea that we can never understand each other because we come from different experiences and cultures. Most post-positivists are constructivists who believe that we each construct our view of the world based on our perceptions of it. Because perception and observation is fallible, our constructions must be imperfect. So what is meant by objectivity in a post-positivist world? Positivists believed that objectivity was a characteristic that resided in the individual scientist. Scientists are responsible for putting aside their biases and beliefs and seeing the world as it 'really' is. Post-positivists reject the idea that any individual can see the world perfectly as it really is. We are all biased and all of our observations are affected (theory-laden). Our best hope for achieving objectivity is to triangulate across multiple fallible perspectives! Thus, objectivity is not the characteristic of an individual, it is inherently a social phenomenon. It is what multiple individuals are trying to achieve when they criticize each other's work. We never achieve objectivity perfectly, but we can approach it. The best way for us to improve the objectivity of what we do is to do it within the context of a broader contentious community of truth-seekers (including other scientists) who criticize each other's work. The theories that survive such intense scrutiny are a bit like the species that survive in the evolutionary struggle. (This is sometimes called the natural selection theory of knowledge and holds that ideas have 'survival value' and that knowledge evolves through a process of variation, selection and retention). They have adaptive value and are probably as close as our species can come to being objective and understanding reality.
-
-
11 Jul 11
-
It is a position that holds that the goal of knowledge is simply to describe the phenomena that we experience.
-
In a positivist view of the world, science was seen as the way to get at truth, to understand the world well enough so that we might predict and control it.
-
A post-positivist might begin by recognizing that the way scientists think and work and the way we think in our everyday life are not distinctly different. Scientific reasoning and common sense reasoning are essentially the same process.
-
So what is meant by objectivity in a post-positivist world? Positivists believed that objectivity was a characteristic that resided in the individual scientist.
-
Post-positivists reject the idea that any individual can see the world perfectly as it really is.
-
Our best hope for achieving objectivity is to triangulate across multiple fallible perspectives!
-
Thus, objectivity is not the characteristic of an individual, it is inherently a social phenomenon
-
The best way for us to improve the objectivity of what we do is to do it within the context of a broader contentious community of truth-seekers (including other scientists) who criticize each other's work.
-
-
08 Jul 11
Barbara McDonaldAn easy read about the difference between Positivism and Post-Positivism. Still trying to get my head around all this philosophical stuff.
-
19 Jun 11
-
09 Apr 11
-
30 Mar 11
-
simple distinction between epistemology and methodology.
-
world better. Epistemology and
-
methodology are intimately relat
-
lot of our stereotypes about science
-
science was dominated by a particular philosophy -- positivism --
-
n era of post-positivism where many of those stereotypes of the scientist no longer hold up
-
, positivism is a rejection of metaphysics
-
goal of knowledge is simply to describe the phenomena that we experience.
-
purpose of science is simply to stick to what we can observe and measure. Knowledge of anything beyond that, a positivist would hold, is impossibl
-
Since we can't directly observe emotions, thoughts, etc. (although we may be able to measure some of the physical and physiological accompaniments), these were not legitimate topics for a scientific psychology.
-
science was seen as the way to get at truth
-
we might predict and control it. The world and the universe were deterministic
-
theory doesn't fit the facts well and so we need to revise our theory to better predict reality.
-
The positivist believed in empiricism -- the idea that observation and measurement was the core of the scientific endeavor
-
our shift away from positivism into what we term post-positivism.
-
the way scientists think and work and the way we think in our everyday life are not distinctly different.
-
There is no difference in kind between the two, only a difference in degree.
-
most common forms of post-positivism is a philosophy called critical realism
-
reality independent of our thinking about it that science can study
-
Positivists were also realists. The difference is that the post-positivist critical realist recognizes that
-
all observation is fallible and has error and that all theory is revisable
-
the critical realist is critical of our ability to know reality with certainty.
-
ost-positivist critical realist believes that the goal of science is to hold steadfastly to the goal of getting it right about reality
-
The post-positivist also believes that all observations are theory-laden and that scientists (and everyone else, for that matter) are inherently biased by their cultural experiences,
-
That is, post-positivism rejects the relativist idea of the incommensurability of different perspectives, the idea that we can never understand each other because we come from different experiences and cultures.
-
ost post-positivists are constructivists who believe that we each construct our view of the world based on our perceptions of it. Because perception and observation is fallible, our constructions must be imperfect.
-
Positivists believed that objectivity was a characteristic that resided in the individual scientist. Scientists are responsible for putting aside their biases and beliefs and seeing the world as it 'really' is
-
Our best hope for achieving objectivity is to triangulate across multiple fallible perspectives
-
ultiple individuals are trying to achieve when they criticize each
-
We never achieve objectivity perfectly, but we can approach it. The best way for us to improve the objectivity of what we do is to do it within the context of a broader contentious community of truth-seekers (
-
It is what m
-
The theories that survive such intense scrutiny are a bit like the species that survive in the evolutionary struggle. (This is sometimes called the natural selection theory of knowledge and holds that ideas have 'survival value' a
-
that knowledge evolves through a process of variation, selection and retention
-
Clearly, all of this stuff is not for the faint-of-heart.
-
-
07 Mar 11
-
16 Feb 11
-
21 Jan 11
-
23 Dec 10
-
Positivism & Post-Positivism
-
simple distinction between epistemology and methodology.
-
epistemology is the philosophy of knowledge or of how we come to know
-
Methodology is focused on the specific ways -- the methods -- that we can use to try to understand our world bette
-
Epistemology and methodology are intimately related: the former involves the philosophy of how we come to know the world and the latter involves the practice.
-
The purpose of science is simply to stick to what we can observe and measure. Knowledge of anything beyond that, a positivist would hold, is impossible.
-
We use deductive reasoning to postulate theories that we can test.
-
The positivist believed in empiricism -- the idea that observation and measurement was the core of the scientific endeavor.
-
post-positivism is a wholesale rejection of the central tenets of positivism
-
One of the most common forms of post-positivism is a philosophy called critical realism.
-
Positivists were also realists. The difference is that the post-positivist critical realist recognizes that all observation is fallible and has error and that all theory is revisable.
-
the critical realist is critical of our ability to know reality with certainty
-
Because all measurement is fallible, the post-positivist emphasizes the importance of multiple measures and observations, each of which may possess different types of error, and the need to use triangulation across these multiple errorful sources to try to get a better bead on what's happening in reality.
-
The post-positivist also believes that all observations are theory-laden and that scientists (and everyone else, for that matter) are inherently biased by their cultural experiences, world views, and so on.
-
post-positivism rejects the relativist idea of the incommensurability of different perspectives, the idea that we can never understand each other because we come from different experiences and cultures.
-
Most post-positivists are constructivists who believe that we each construct our view of the world based on our perceptions of it. Because perception and observation is fallible, our constructions must be imperfect.
-
Post-positivists reject the idea that any individual can see the world perfectly as it really is. We are all biased and all of our observations are affected (theory-laden). Our best hope for achieving objectivity is to triangulate across multiple fallible perspectives!
-
-
01 Dec 10
-
10 Nov 10
-
11 Oct 10
-
24 Aug 10
-
10 Jun 10
-
03 Apr 10
-
Clearly, all of this stuff is not for the faint-of-heart. I've seen many a graduate student get lost in the maze of philosophical assumptions that contemporary philosophers of science argue about. And don't think that I believe this is not important stuff. But, in the end, I tend to turn pragmatist on these matters. Philosophers have been debating these issues for thousands of years and there is every reason to believe that they will continue to debate them for thousands of years more. Those of us who are practicing scientists should check in on this debate from time to time (perhaps every hundred years or so would be about right). We should think about the assumptions we make about the world when we conduct research. But in the meantime, we can't wait for the philosophers to settle the matter. After all, we do have our own work to do!
-
-
22 Aug 09
-
24 Apr 09
-
17 Jan 09
-
20 Nov 08
-
22 Sep 08
George BradfordLet's start our very brief discussion of philosophy of science with a simple distinction between epistemology and methodology. The term epistemology comes from the Greek word epistêmê, their term for knowledge. In simple terms, epistemology is the philosophy of knowledge or of how we come to know. Methodology is also concerned with how we come to know, but is much more practical in nature. Methodology is focused on the specific ways -- the methods -- that we can use to try to understand our world better. Epistemology and methodology are intimately related: the former involves the philosophy of how we come to know the world and the latter involves the practice.
-
The difference is that the post-positivist critical realist recognizes that all observation is fallible and has error and that all theory is revisable. In other words, the critical realist is critical of our ability to know reality with certainty.
-
Because all measurement is fallible, the post-positivist emphasizes the importance of multiple measures and observations, each of which may possess different types of error, and the need to use triangulation across these multiple errorful sources to try to get a better bead on what's happening in reality.
-
Most post-positivists are constructivists who believe that we each construct our view of the world based on our perceptions of it. Because perception and observation is fallible, our constructions must be imperfect.
-
Post-positivists reject the idea that any individual can see the world perfectly as it really is. We are all biased and all of our observations are affected (theory-laden). Our best hope for achieving objectivity is to triangulate across multiple fallible perspectives! Thus, objectivity is not the characteristic of an individual, it is inherently a social phenomenon.
-
-
22 May 08
-
rly, all of this stuff is not for the faint-of-heart. I've seen many a graduate student get lost in the maze of philosophical assumptions that contemporary philoso
-
-
17 Jan 08
-
It is a position that holds that the goal of knowledge is simply to describe the phenomena that we experience. The purpose of science is simply to stick to what we can observe and measure
-
behaviorists in mid-20th Century psychology. These were the mythical 'rat runners' who believed that psychology could only study what could be directly observed and measured
-
B.F. Skinner argued that psychology needed to concentrate only on the positive and negative reinforcers of behavior in order to predict how people will behave
-
A post-positivist might begin by recognizing that the way scientists think and work and the way we think in our everyday life are not distinctly different. Scientific reasoning and common sense reasoning are essentially the same process
-
the post-positivist critical realist recognizes that all observation is fallible and has error and that all theory is revisable
-
Page Comments
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.