This link has been bookmarked by 68 people . It was first bookmarked on 10 Jan 2008, by Eric Holter.
-
25 May 09
george jensenWhatever it is, it needs to layer an understanding of semantics on top of a consumer application. The consumer application needs to be so cool and so viral that people will be open to learning that it is powered by semantic technologies. In that case, it will be possible to further market applications as Semantic Web apps. Consumers will understand that if one Semantic Web application has potential, so might others. In math, this is called proof by induction. In marketing this is called creating a market. In any case, it needs to be done.
-
Whatever it is, it needs to layer an understanding of semantics on top of a consumer application.
The consumer application needs to be so cool and so viral that people will be open to learning that it is powered
by semantic technologies. In that case, it will be possible to further market applications as Semantic Web apps. Consumers will understand that if one Semantic Web application has potential, so might others. In math, this is called
proof by induction. In marketing this is called creating a market. In any case, it needs to be done. -
There is a misunderstanding about the Semantic Web which is floating around, which equates the Semantic Web with ability to solve really hard problems. It is simply not true.
- 1 more annotations...
-
-
So what is realistic and possible today? The first in the list of growing applications
are Semantic Knowledge Databases.
-
-
-
30 Mar 09
Susan GrossmanThe Semantic Web has been in the making for some time and people think it is nearing maturity. We have written about this trend extensively, with our two ...
-
28 Feb 09
-
01 Feb 09
-
26 Jan 09
-
14 Jan 09
-
11 Jan 09
-
18 Nov 08
-
13 Nov 08
Alan LevineThe consumer application needs to be so cool and so viral that people will be open to learning that it is powered by semantic technologies. In that case, it will be possible to further market applications as Semantic Web apps. Consumers will understand th
-
02 Nov 08
-
Whatever it is, it needs to layer an understanding of semantics on top of a consumer application.
The consumer application needs to be so cool and so viral that people will be open to learning that it is powered
by semantic technologies. -
Since the beginning, the Semantic Web has been associated with Artificial Intelligence. The idea
of representing information in structured form so that computers can "understand it" and then solve complex problems was one
of the keystones of the Semantic Web vision - 11 more annotations...
-
-
An alternative would be to "teach" computers natural language.
-
Related to natural language understanding, is another idea that is not on the horizon. John Markoff called it
"the perfect vacation." -
Finding the "perfect" vacation is not a one shot deal, it is a process,
which leverages iteration and memory. -
True, with the Semantic Web the information is structured, but it does not mean that the computer can necessarily solve complex problems.
-
But beyond the execution, there is still another problem. For a semantic knowledge base to be the killer app it needs to
ignite imagination and capture people's hearts and minds. This is not likely to happen. We appreciate libraries, we can not
live without them, but we take them for granted. Knowledge has been commoditized thanks to Google, Wikipedia, and the blogosphere,
and is perceived as abundant and unexciting. For this reason Semantic Databases are not likely to be the killer apps -- but they
might become a stepping stone towards one. -
On top of having the pressure to deliver qualitatively better results,
Semantic Search companies also have to, at least approximately, solve the problem of natural language understanding,
which as we discussed earlier is a very difficult one. -
The understanding
of natural language does not seem to give you a noticeable edge in getting better search results -
The statistical algorithm deployed by Google is precise and good enough, which is why it has been the clear leader in web search for the past 8 years.
-
Increasingly, we are seeing a new breed of Semantic Applications, which we generalize as shortcuts.
-
What is common between all these technologies is that they leverage the simple semantics of the content to deliver additional information.
-
This is essentially discovery or reverse search.
-
-
-
07 Sep 08
-
04 Sep 08
Ramon SampangThe Semantic Web has been in the making for some time and people think it is nearing maturity. We have written about this trend extensively, with our two ...
-
04 Jul 08
-
23 Jun 08
Gianto WidiantoThe Semantic Web has been in the making for some time and people think it is nearing maturity. We have written about this trend extensively, with our two ...
-
16 Jun 08
-
07 Jun 08
-
30 Mar 08
-
27 Mar 08
-
26 Mar 08
-
25 Mar 08
-
23 Mar 08
-
22 Mar 08
-
21 Mar 08
-
20 Mar 08
-
19 Feb 08
Sebastian WeberThere is no way that consumers will appreciate the elegance and mathematical soundness of RDF and OWL. People don't care about math, they care about utility and even more, about fun. What the Semantic Web needs, then, is a killer app.
2008 semanticweb semantic web2.0 web3.0 killerapp readwriteweb research toread applications analysis for:leobard
-
29 Jan 08
-
18 Jan 08
Stefan MellesWe are still waiting for the killer app for Semantic Web, something that can get viral and turn semantics into a marketing term. Problems like natural language understanding still remain difficult to solve, and the solutions do not appear to be on our hor
-
17 Jan 08
-
15 Jan 08
-
14 Jan 08
-
12 Jan 08
-
Mikel Madina[EN] Consideraciones sobre los posibles usos de la web semántica: reconocimiento de lenaguje natural, bases de datos semánticas, búsquedas semánticas, gráficos sociales...
-
11 Jan 08
Mike KorcynskiThe Semantic Web has been in the making for some time and people think it is nearing maturity. We have written about this trend extensively, with our two ...
-
10 Jan 08
-
-
The Semantic Web has been in the making for some time and people think it is nearing maturity.
We have written about this trend extensively, with our two most notable posts being an analysis of the challenges of the classic bottom-up approach and the promise of the new top-down one. Regardless of how the Semantic Web will come about, for it to flourish
it needs to hit the mainstream. There is no way that consumers will appreciate the elegance and mathematical soundness of RDF and OWL. People don't care about math, they care about utility and even more, about fun. What the Semantic Web needs, then, is a killer app.
-
-
-
True, with the Semantic Web the information is structured, but it does not mean that the computer can necessarily solve complex problems.
These are two completely different things. Just because you have a map, does not mean that you know the best way to get from point A to point B. Having a map is necessary, but it is not sufficient, you need the algorithm to find the best path.
-
-
-
True, with the Semantic Web the information is structured, but it does not mean that the computer can necessarily solve complex problems.
These are two completely different things. Just because you have a map, does not mean that you know the best way to get from point A to point B. Having a map is necessary, but it is not sufficient, you need the algorithm to find the best path.
-
-
Jim MillesThe Semantic Web has been in the making for some time and people think it is nearing maturity. We have written about this trend extensively, with our two ...
-
-
Natual Language Understanding
Since the beginning, the Semantic Web has been associated with Artificial Intelligence. The idea
of representing information in structured form so that computers can "understand it" and then solve complex problems was one
of the keystones of the Semantic Web vision. The problem is that representing billions of existing web documents as RDF is a rather
daunting, if not impossible task. An alternative would be to "teach" computers natural language. If an application could read the page
the way we read it and interpret what it says, the annotations would not be necessary.
-
-
Gordon Haff"There is a misunderstanding about the Semantic Web which is floating around, which equates the Semantic Web with ability to solve really hard problems. It is simply not true." IOW, it's only incremental.
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.