This link has been bookmarked by 80 people . It was first bookmarked on 28 Aug 2008, by Nele Noppe.
-
29 Sep 11
-
27 Sep 11
-
02 May 11
-
01 May 11
-
06 Mar 11
-
21 Jan 11
-
20 Jan 11
-
17 Dec 10
-
09 Dec 10
-
09 Nov 10
-
31 Oct 10
Marcella McPheeSo you know what I say? I say screw Strong Female Characters.
What we need now are some Weak Female Characters. My arguments below
the fold… -
15 Oct 10
-
14 Oct 10
Vermin DiscipleI think the major problem here is that women were clamoring for “strong female characters,” and male writers misunderstood. They thought the feminists meant [Strong Female] Characters. The feminists meant [Strong Characters], Female.
-
12 Oct 10
Elisa DoucetteGood characters, male or female, have goals, and they have flaws. Any character without flaws will be a cardboard cutout. Perhaps a sexy cardboard cutout, but two-dimensional nonetheless.
-
05 Sep 10
-
21 Jul 10
June CollinsWhat it says on the tin. Interesting meta on the current SFC thing in the media.
meta author.overthinking.it genre.glbtq.sexuality.and.gender genre.fem.fic genre.writing.and.popular.culture
-
09 Jul 10
-
19 May 10
-
16 Apr 10
-
22 Mar 10
-
13 Mar 10
Alternate Voiceson stereotypical 'Strong Female Characters' and how they're unrealistic.
-
Olga BurmakovaSo what flaws can female characters have? Uh, I don’t know. How about the same flaws a male character would have?
-
12 Mar 10
-
11 Mar 10
-
10 Mar 10
latriviataYeah, the trouble is, although these characters were marginally better than the original Damsels in Distress, they still ended up having to be saved in the final act by the male hero. There would usually be a scene (or three) where the “Strong Female Cha
-
09 Mar 10
holly ASo you know what I say? I say screw Strong Female Characters. What we need now are some Weak Female Characters. My arguments below the fold…
-
06 Mar 10
T. Po"I think the major problem here is that women were clamoring for “strong female characters,” and male writers misunderstood. They thought the feminists meant [Strong Female] Characters. The feminists meant [Strong Characters], Female."
-
05 Mar 10
kuiskata .I think the major problem here is that women were clamoring for “strong female characters,” and male writers misunderstood. They thought the feminists meant [Strong Female] Characters. The feminists meant [Strong Characters], Female. So the feminists sh
-
04 Mar 10
-
03 Mar 10
-
02 Mar 10
Fire crackerSo the feminists shouldn’t have said “we want more strong female characters.” They should have said “we want more WEAK female characters.” Not “weak” meaning “Damsel in Distress.” “Weak” meaning “flawed.”
Good characters, male or female, have goals, a -
05 Feb 10
-
14 Jan 10
lattara wayI think the major problem here is that women were clamoring for “strong female characters,” and male writers misunderstood. They thought the feminists meant [Strong Female] Characters. The feminists meant [Strong Characters], Female.
-
16 Nov 09
-
21 May 09
-
28 Feb 09
-
13 Jan 09
-
13 Dec 08
-
05 Dec 08
-
30 Sep 08
Melody LeeOpening Arguments Last night I finally saw the 2007 Transformers movie. It was OK, in a Michael Bay sort of way, but it was very clear that it was made for
-
29 Sep 08
-
18 Sep 08
-
02 Sep 08
-
29 Aug 08
-
28 Aug 08
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.