Can you believe, there was a time when the American public did not believe in the power of the almighty psyche to explain it all, for all time and all people
This is an important distinction. In essence it tells us that the dominant tendency today is to explain everything in terms of particulars, of here and now and to deny the extension of these ideas to great/broad swaths of reality
Excellent example of a statement that deal witht the issue of instability of apparent stability. Here, however, the issue is still to be settled. American society was, indeed, extremely stable and very resistant to communist and socialist agitation, despite the great leeway these movements had in America.
Notable, very important to remember.... Merton is a scholar you should definitely read... In fact, we will try to read his work in this class later in the semester...
Although this sounds cynical, it only indicates that this exercise can be used for abusing the idea of violating the generally held ideas of the multitudes.
In other words, radical sociology relies on the idea that even when things seem to work the should, they are in fact failing to serve us, due to their hidden, repressive agendas.
The overaching lesson of this section that we shoud not use any one-dimensional, absolute measure for judging the worth of a social phenonmena, but that we should use a trade-offs perspective...
Davis' take on Kuhn is not only funny but also magisterial... There is no suposed "group" consensus, all scientists are in search for the one and only, their own, explanation
Attention, the statements made in this piece about the level of "interest" to be bestowed to various theories is independent of the validity of verifiability of those same theories.
Public Stiky Notes
Page Comments
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.