Innovate - Ten Core Principles for Designing Effective Learning Environments: ... - The Diigo Meta page

• 02 Feb 10
  

  Jason Zagami

  Research_-_Brain_Research pedagogy education learning elearning theory research design

• 23 Sep 09
  

  Lisa Durff
• 13 Sep 09
  

  eci831 blogpost lists learning 2.0

• 05 Sep 09
  

  Ramon Aragon

  Diez Principios Básicos para el diseño eficaz de los entornos de aprendizaje:
  Análisis en profundidad de la investigación del cerebro y la Teoría Pedagógica

  Innovación Cerebro Estudiantes Aprendizaje

• 

  Ramón Aragón

  Diez Principios Básicos para el diseño eficaz de los entornos de aprendizaje:
  Análisis en profundidad de la investigación del cerebro y la Teoría Pedagógica

  Innovación Cerebro Estudiantes Aprendizaje

• 12 Jul 08
  

  Rhonda Wills

  pedagogy Technology learning Theory Brain-based

• 16 Jun 08
  

  K Creagh

  QuickD

• 15 May 08
  

  Ryan Bretag

  learning Pedagogy constructivism teaching

• 27 Apr 08
  

  Helen Mongan-Rallis

  Ten Core Principles for Designing Effective Learning Environments:
  Insights from Brain Research and Pedagogical Theory
  by Judith V. Boettcher
  Journal of Online Education
  February/March 2007
  Volume 3, Issue 3

  Technology Distance education

• 28 Mar 08
  

  James Fadden

  Pedagogy constructivism innovate teaching

• 21 Jan 08
  

  Marnie McMillan

  Generation.com

• 30 Dec 07
  

  Alec Couros

  Brain research, pedagogical theory and effective learning design.

  eci831 articles learning theories pedagogy

• 10 Apr 07
  

  michelemmartin
  • A corollary of the time-on-task principle is that learning can be more efficient if we organize information into chunks. In today's virtual media environments, simulations, animations, and living worlds such as SimCity are powerful "learning chunkers." Chunking is just one reason games and role-playing scenarios are popular and valuable. Other valuable features of games and simulations are their unpredictability, their interactive qualities, and their infinite variety. Canned, predictable, and static learning resources such as books, preprogrammed tutorials, and linear video experiences are less interesting and less engaging. The more dynamic and interactive the learning experience, the more likely students will invest greater amounts of time in the learning process.
  • This simply means that as students spend more time interacting with information and practicing skills, the more proficient, accomplished, and confident they will become. Time-on-task helps students to make the knowledge their own. Learning is intrinsically rewarding and enjoyable. If we design great experiences, students will spend more time interacting with the course content and developing more complex, networked knowledge structures and efficient behaviors.
  • The goal for all students is mastering a slightly off-center slice of the pie that includes the whole of the core concepts.
  • Discussion forums, blogging, journals, and small group work are all excellent strategies for allowing learners to enlarge their mental models, to clarify concepts, and to establish meaningful links and relationships. Online tools are particularly valuable in this context because they provide a public forum in which the cumulative, step-by-step process of concept formation, refinement, application, and revision is fully visible to student peers as well as their mentors. By providing a comprehensive record of how concepts take form through multiple clusters of knowledge, such media can promote more complex and lasting retention of course material among students.
  • A popular new teaching and learning theory advocates making students' thinking visible (Collins, Brown, and Holum 1991; Bransford, Brown, and Cocking 2000). Making thinking visible requires students to create, talk, write, explain, analyze, judge, report, and inquire. These types of activities make it clear to students themselves, to the faculty, and to fellow learners what students know or do not know, what they are puzzled about, and what they might be curious about with regard to the course material. Such activities stimulate the student's growth from concept awareness to concept acquisition, building in that series of intellectual operations that Vygotsky believes is required for concept acquisition.
  • When faced with a new field or discipline, students typically focus on learning the vocabulary of a discipline, but this activity is often done in isolation from an understanding of the concepts that give the words meaning. Without the underlying concepts, words are akin to isolated weeds and seeds likely to be blown away by the winds of time, usually mere hours after an exam.
  • Vygotsky's concept of ZPD not only highlights the importance of preliminary assessments of student knowledge; it also suggests that the window of learning opportunity for any individual student may be smaller than what we might expect. When students say they are totally lost, they are probably expressing the feeling of being outside their zone. When students sit back and obviously disengage, it means they have probably lost the link, the relationship of one idea to the other.
  • A related educational principle counsels teachers to build on what students already know, and recent memory research is confirming this principle by demonstrating the impact of students' existing mental models on incoming knowledge (Damasio 1999). The process of learning might be defined as the process of our brain finding receptor nodes for bits of new information and then arranging that information into a useful mental model. When learners encounter not just one concept but a confluence of new and unfamiliar discrete items in rapid succession, they must work to attach this incoming knowledge to existing nodes and patterns. The more concepts, the more patterns, and the more interconnectedness in the brain structure, the more receptor nodes exist. For cognitive researchers as well as instructors, this principle applies: "The more you know, the more you can know."
  • The process of designing learning environments includes anticipating the existing knowledge structure of the learners' brains at the outset of a course.
  • The role of the faculty is to design and structure the course experiences, direct and support learners through the instructional events, and assess the learner outcomes.
  • In an environment infused with these tools, the faculty member moves from the center of the class communication pattern—as is common in the traditional transmission mode of learning—to the periphery. In turn, the anywhere/anytime access to communication tools makes it easy for students to go outside the organized course structure and content. Another significant design impact of these tools is the ease by which students can customize their own learning experiences as the content boundaries of a course dissolve. Readily available mobile tools now support information access and flow in real time, enabling current events, global perspectives, and far-flung resources to be brought into immediate and fresh relief. Every statement by a faculty member is subject to challenge, addition, or confirmation from a student's Google search. Many teachers have been surprised by the shifts in learning dynamics and relationships created by these tools; at the same time, many teachers are now enthusiastically embracing these changes as they recognize the many benefits of learners becoming more engaged and active in their learning.
  • Tools make a difference in any learning environment.
  • The question to be anticipated by faculty when they are designing a set of course experiences is where, when, with whom, and with what resources will any particular instructional event be likely to occur, and what are the expected outcomes?
  • Whatever the scenario, it is the student who is at the center of the learning experience: The student is on stage, guided by the task design created by the faculty member, accessing whatever resources might be needed, and acquiring useful knowledge from the experience. This fundamental design framework serves as a context for the principles that follow.
  • This framework (LeMKE) has four elements—the Learner, the Mentor/faculty member, the Knowledge, and the Environment (Boettcher 2003). This principle can be captured by envisioning a learning experience featuring the learner "on stage" actively learning under the direction of the mentor/faculty member using a set of resources containing the knowledge/content/skills to be learned within an environment.

  13 more annotations...

• 05 Apr 07
  

  E. Alana James

  imported EdDlinks pedagogy

• 08 Mar 07
  

  Tom Hemingway

  Judith V. Boettcher provides ten core learning principles that can guide technology-enhanced teaching as well as more traditional forms of instruction.

  constructivism teaching tech_integration blogfodder

• 02 Mar 07
  

  Jeremy Price

  totag

• 01 Mar 07
  

  Mark Pegrum

  education pedagogy VLEs constructivism design

• 16 Feb 07
  

  Norton Gusky

  Use with PEP class on March 7

  pedogogy elearning education theory research PEP instruction learning

• 15 Feb 07
  

  Dennis Bayeng

  delicious

• 

  Rick L

  In this article, Judith V. Boettcher provides ten core learning principles that can guide technology-enhanced teaching as well as more traditional forms of instruction. Drawn from both traditional pedagogical theory as well as current research about how p

  elearning VLE @CuL

• 

  Rick La

  In this article, Judith V. Boettcher provides ten core learning principles that can guide technology-enhanced teaching as well as more traditional forms of instruction. Drawn from both traditional pedagogical theory as well as current research about how p

  elearning VLE @CuL

• 11 Feb 07
  

  guenter_w

  (Mit Vorsicht zu genießen; bzw. je im Detail zu prüfen.)

  ID-principles

• 07 Feb 07
  

  Bobby Hobgood, Ed.D.

  online_pedagogy

• 06 Feb 07
  

  Ellen Marie Murphy

  pedagogy elearning learning instructional_design research Education Theory instruction

• 05 Feb 07
  

  John Martin

  ce5560 ce5560readings design environment learning

  • Every Structured Learning Experience Has Four Elements with the Learner at the Center
• 

  Dwayne Harapnuik

  pedagogy elearning Learning Theory

• 04 Feb 07
  

  Yvonne Murtagh

  Research findings into how brains work - stimulating re-examination of traditional principles of designing teaching & learning experiences; plus guidance for designing learning experiences for high tech environments ( Innovate)

  research learning pedagogy tools personalised VLE ICT

• 01 Feb 07
  

  Patrick Aroune

  2.0 differentiated instruction learning links web

  • The more dynamic and interactive the learning experience, the more likely students will invest greater amounts of time in the learning process.
  • As matching content and practice to each student's zone of proximal development is still a very inexact science at this time, the best way of ensuring a match is for the set of course materials and course experiences to be rich and diverse.
  • students spend more time interacting with information and practicing skills, the more proficient, accomplished, and confident they will become.
  • If the desired outcome is for students to be great chefs, they probably need to cook
  • planning student assessments simultaneously with the planning of instructional experiences and of embedding assessments within instructional events
  • Robert Gagne, widely considered as the father of the discipline of instructional design, observed in Conditions of Learning (1965) that all instruction is not equal and that different types of instruction are required for different learning outcomes.
  • designing a course includes providing access to a rich database of content and experiences
  • The course Web sites used in blended and online learning environments enable linking to an expanded set of resources to support a wide range of problem analysis and customized experiences.
  • This learning principle highlights the distinction between the course content that is the means of learning and the core concepts to be acquired and developed by individual students.
  • All Learners Do Not Need to Learn All Course Content; All Learners Do Need to Learn the Core Concepts
  • Discussion forums, blogging, journals, and small group work are all excellent strategies for allowing learners to enlarge their mental models, to clarify concepts, and to establish meaningful links and relationships. Online tools are particularly valuable in this context because they provide a public forum in which the cumulative, step-by-step process of concept formation, refinement, application, and revision is fully visible to student peers as well as their mentors.
  • Making thinking visible requires students to create, talk, write, explain, analyze, judge, report, and inquire.
  • making students' thinking visible
  • isolated weeds and seeds
  • isolation from an understanding of the concepts that give the words meaning
  • learning the vocabulary of a discipline
  • Concept formation is not a one-time event; rather, it is a series of intellectual operations including the centering of attention, abstracting, synthesizing, and symbolizing
  • embedding feedback and demonstrations from students earlier and more consistently throughout a course experience
  • What are the elements of the learning community that allow the mentor to check in with each learner on a regular basis
  • When students sit back and obviously disengage, it means they have probably lost the link,
  • When students say they are totally lost, they are probably expressing the feeling of being outside their zone
  • currently available technological tools provide instructors with a wider range of avenues for gaining this valuable information about their students.
  • sking students about what they already know—or think they know
  • "The more you know, the more you can know."
  • The process of learning might be defined as the process of our brain finding receptor nodes for bits of new information and then arranging that information into a useful mental model.
  • Most courses are designed with a set of core concepts and knowledge for the students to learn;
  • faculty will be less involved in classes, but that these new instructional options will provide faculty with more effective ways to leverage their expertise
  • all teaching functions no longer need to be embodied in one person but can be assumed by various members of instructional teams
  • through online forms of communication students can support other students, either formally or informally, almost 24/7
  • students, and assume greater responsibility as front line moderators for the course.
  • moderate discussion forums
  • director of the learning experience, not the "sage on the stage"
  • design and structure the course experiences, direct and support learners through the instructional events, and assess the learner outcomes
  • critical role of the mentor/faculty member
  • information access and flow in real time, enabling current events, global perspectives, and far-flung resources to be brought into immediate and fresh relief
  • ease by which students can customize their own learning experiences as the content boundaries of a course dissolve
  • realignment of faculty roles and student learning activities
  • students have discovered the community-building and networking power of instant messaging, discussion boards, online forums, blogs, and wikis while still occasionally using e-mail. These tools are dramatically changing the communication patterns and relationships between learners and the faculty.
  • previous generations, the faculty member lectured, the students took notes, and the learning process unfolded within a relatively limited and discrete environment of tools and technologies
  • Tools make a difference in any learning environment
  • The environment as envisioned in these theories includes all the tools, resources, and people that are part of any particular learning experience
  • faculty members provide a richly textured environment that can accommodate a full range of student needs and learning styles
  • best combination of learning experiences available for their students
  • The question to be anticipated by faculty when they are designing a set of course experiences is where, when, with whom, and with what resources will any particular instructional event be likely to occur, and what are the expected outcomes?
  • very learning experience occurs within an environment in which the learner interacts with the content, knowledge, skill, or expert
  • student who is at the center of the learning experience:
  • The fourth element, the environment
  • third element is the knowledge
  • mentor/faculty member may be physically present on stage, may remain in the wings directing the learner, or may only be present implicitly by virtue of having designed the instructional event.
  • ase of collaborative and group learning activities, for example, multiple learners may well be on stage at the same time, but every learner experiences the learning somewhat differently
  • many variations of this framework
  • learner "on stage" actively learning under the direction of the mentor/faculty member using a set of resources containing the knowledge/content/skills to be learned within an environment.
  • four elements—the Learner, the Mentor/faculty member, the Knowledge, and the Environment (Boettcher 2003).

  51 more annotations...

Would you like to comment?

Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.