This link has been bookmarked by 28 people . It was first bookmarked on 28 Apr 2009, by David Bill.
-
21 Jun 09
-
05 May 09
-
-
Consider
-
a group of researchers who have spent decades exploring a subject. They will be better able to understand new research in the field than a masters student with limited experience. By the same account, a student who has just overcome hurdles in understanding a new subject area can provide better help to others who are still struggling than could an expert who has long since forgotten the experience of being a novice in the field
-
-
04 May 09
mary little-finneganI’ve gained much from being a transparent learner. O
-
I’ve gained much from being a transparent learner. O
-
-
-
Consider a group of researchers who have spent decades exploring a subject. They will be better able to understand new research in the field than a masters student with limited experience. By the same account, a student who has just overcome hurdles in understanding a new subject area can provide better help to others who are still struggling than could an expert who has long since forgotten the experience of being a novice in the field.
-
when we make our learning transparent, we become teachers. Even if we are new to a field and don’t have the confidence to dialogue with experts, we can still provide important learning opportunities to others.
-
-
03 May 09
-
02 May 09
-
-
Putting ideas out for discussion contrasts with formal “reach a conclusion and publish” model.
-
but it seems to me that individuals who share similar cognitive architectures (novices with novices and experts with experts) have greater capacity to communicate.
- 2 more annotations...
-
-
But the value of dialogue and discourse in learning can’t be subjugated to the view that all contributions should advance a field. Transparency in expressing our understanding, our frustrations, and our insights helps others who are at a similar stage.
-
progressive insights.
-
-
-
01 May 09
-
30 Apr 09
-
I’ve gained much from being a transparent learner. Over the last nine years - on blogs, wikis, and recently Twitter - I’ve expressed half-formed ideas and received the benefit of constructive (and critical feedback). I generally focus on what I’ve gained, but I suspect readers of my sites and articles have gained something from the experience as well. Putting ideas out for discussion contrasts with formal “reach a conclusion and publish” model.
-
-
-
e are told that legitimate peripheral participation (LPP) is an important stage in developing our confidence to contribute and belong to a community. I’m not sure I agree
-
this places the needs of the field above the needs of the individual
- 2 more annotations...
-
-
As an amateur in a field, I will likely learn more from those who have a similar understanding to my own. I can relate better to learners at this stage.
-
But the value of dialogue and discourse in learning can’t be subjugated to the view that all contributions should advance a field
-
-
-
29 Apr 09
James Herbert"I’ve gained much from being a transparent learner. Over the last nine years - on blogs, wikis, and recently Twitter - I’ve expressed half-formed ideas and received the benefit of constructive (and critical feedback). I generally focus on what I’ve gained, but I suspect readers of my sites and articles have gained something from the experience as well. Putting ideas out for discussion contrasts with formal “reach a conclusion and publish” model."
-
Social technology - such as Twitter, blogs, Facebook - opens the door to sharing the process of learning, not only the final product
-
Experts utilize pattern recognition in comparing new situations to previous experiences.
- 4 more annotations...
-
-
Novices, in contrast, have not yet developed a rich experience base. As such, learning for novices is sequential.
-
The varying cognitive architecture of those who are new to a subject and those with significant experience provides support to the value of peer-to-peer learning.
-
individuals who share similar cognitive architectures (novices with novices and experts with experts) have greater capacity to communicate.
-
this places the needs of the field above the needs of the individual.
-
-
-
28 Apr 09
-
My argument is this: when we make our learning transparent, we become teachers. Even if we are new to a field and don’t have the confidence to dialogue with experts, we can still provide important learning opportunities to others.
-
-
Dave TrussProminent and transparent learners
I can’t speak for them, but from reading prominent educational technology bloggers - Will Richardson, Terry Anderson, Stephen Downes, Grainne Conole - I’m left with the impression that they too seek not to proclaim what they know, but rather to engage and share with others as they explore and come to understand technology and related trends.
Watching others learn is an act of learning.-
Prominent and transparent learners
I can’t speak for them, but from reading prominent educational technology bloggers - Will Richardson, Terry Anderson, Stephen Downes, Grainne Conole - I’m left with the impression that they too seek not to proclaim what they know, but rather to engage and share with others as they explore and come to understand technology and related trends.
Watching others learn is an act of learning.
-
My argument is this: when we make our learning transparent, we become teachers. Even if we are new to a field and don’t have the confidence to dialogue with experts, we can still provide important learning opportunities to others.
-
-
-
My argument is this: when we make our learning transparent, we become teachers. Even if we are new to a field and don’t have the confidence to dialogue with experts, we can still provide important learning opportunities to others.
-
-
Martin LindnerMy argument is this: when we make our learning transparent, we become teachers. Even if we are new to a field and don’t have the confidence to dialogue with experts, we can still provide important learning opportunities to others.
-
-
My work on blogs, articles, handbooks, and so on is an invitation to engage in conversation, not a proclamation of what I absolutely know.
-
the value of dialogue and discourse in learning can’t be subjugated to the view that all contributions should advance a field.
-
-
-
My argument is this: when we make our learning transparent, we become teachers. Even if we are new to a field and don’t have the confidence to dialogue with experts, we can still provide important learning opportunities to others.
-
-
-
When someone decides to share their thoughts and ideas in a transparent manner, they become a teacher to those who are observing. Social technology - such as Twitter, blogs, Facebook - opens the door to sharing the process of learning, not only the final product.
-
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.