This link has been bookmarked by 11 people . It was first bookmarked on 27 Dec 2008, by david miller.
-
25 Mar 09
-
infused with IT i
-
As I said in my keynote at the Web 2.0 Expo NY (and in a followup radar post), WalMart is a better example of Enterprise 2.0 than any of these more trendy examples of user contribution systems.
- 6 more annotations...
-
-
If Google's key innovation with PageRank was to recognize that a link was a vote, which could be counted and measured to get better search results, so too, WalMart recognized early on that a purchase was a vote.
-
competitive advantage comes from capturing data more quickly, and building systems to respond automatically to that data.
-
Sensing, processing, and responding (based on pre-built models of what matters, "the database of expectations," so to speak) is arg
-
hybrid human-machine system
-
What became clear in the ensuing decade is that humans are not just part of the programming, but also sensors and actuators for computers. Our aggregate behavior is measured, monitored, and becomes feedback that improves the overall intelligence of the system. That is why I've said that the defining characteristic of Web 2.0 applications is that they "harness collective intelligence."
-
Aside: I seem to have lost the battle to define Web 2.0 as" the use of the network as platform to build systems that get better the more people use them. Perhaps its the lure of the obvious: companies and products that harness explicit user contribution are easier to recognize than those that pursue the more subtle and difficult task of harnessing implicit contribution. Or perhaps it's the persistent gravitational tug of the idea that the heart of Web 2.0 is ad-supported business models; therefore, enterprise features that look like those of well-known companies featuring user contribution and ad-supported business models must by definition also be "2.0." For me, the far more profound and powerful systems come from harnessing both explicit and implicit human contribution.
-
-
-
19 Mar 09
-
15 Jan 09
Geekgirl 397"Sensing, processing, and responding (based on pre-built models of what matters, "the database of expectations," so to speak) is arguably the hallmark of living things. We're now starting to build computers that work the same way. And we're building enter
web2.0 Business web data socialmedia walmart timoreilly o'reilly collectiveintelligence social opinion 2008 intelligence for:jill_ol
-
04 Jan 09
-
nfused with IT
-
As I said in my keynote at the Web 2.0 Expo NY
- 1 more annotations...
-
-
chain
-
-
-
03 Jan 09
-
WalMart is a better example of Enterprise 2.0 than any of these more trendy examples of user contribution systems.
-
While the infrastructure for data reporting broke down under the pressure of the election, the general trend is clear here: competitive advantage comes from capturing data more quickly, and building systems to respond automatically to that data.
- 1 more annotations...
-
-
What became clear in the ensuing decade is that humans are not just part of the programming, but also sensors and actuators for computers. Our aggregate behavior is measured, monitored, and becomes feedback that improves the overall intelligence of the system. That is why I've said that the defining characteristic of Web 2.0 applications is that they "harness collective intelligence."
-
-
-
30 Dec 08
-
29 Dec 08
-
28 Dec 08
Alan LevineWhat became clear in the ensuing decade is that humans are not just part of the programming, but also sensors and actuators for computers. Our aggregate behavior is measured, monitored, and becomes feedback that improves the overall intelligence of the sy
-
FruFru FourOneWhat do Google, WalMart, and MyBarackObama.com have in common, besides their extraordinary success? They are organizations that are infused with IT in such a way that it leads to a qualitative change in their entire business.
-
27 Dec 08
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.