This link has been bookmarked by 24 people . It was first bookmarked on 18 Jun 2008, by Paul Ryan.
-
04 Sep 09
-
13 Jul 09
Tom KrieglsteinA bloggers response to his quote in "Is google making us Stupid" and an interesting take on the evolving process of digesting content saying it might have used to be a-z in a book, but now it's a-r-g-a-d-z on the web.
-
Maybe I don’t need 250 page books anymore because the web enables me to connect ideas and create narratives that I used to depend on book authors to do for me, because I wasn’t able to access all the information and connect all the dots myself.
-
Maybe the reason why Nick and so many other literati are losing their patience with long form information is that it is so fundamentally inefficient and inferior to connected bits of information.
-
Just look at this post. If there’s any insight here (which still remains to be seen), it didn’t come from a linear process of A to B to C. It came from all of these seemingly random nodes connecting, and all these bits of information coming together, and then suddenly I saw the whole.
-
But even in presenting my “aha,” I’m jumping all over the place because I’m still trying to figure out how to make sense of networked thought process.
-
-
11 Oct 08
-
We can’t yet recognize the superiority of this networked thinking process because we’re measuring it against our old linear thought process.
-
-
08 Aug 08
-
02 Jul 08
Christiane SHThe problem with the AP isn’t really about linking, it’s about quoting. And the problem with quoting is that, now that anyone can publish any thought or idea on the web, and anyone can link to it or reproduce it, the whole notion of quoting and citati
Links Online-Journalismus Nachrichtenagentur Urheberrecht Journalismus
-
30 Jun 08
Ran Onebooks are fundamentally different from the web. Not one coherent whole concept writen over 250 pages but scattered, non-coherent concepts & information
-
Nick argues that we are losing our ability to “read deeply,” e.g. read a whole book and contemplate it, without “distraction.” The problem is he’s using an antiquated yardstick to measure the quality of thought.
Maybe I don’t need 250 page books anymore because the web enables me to connect ideas and create narratives that I used to depend on book authors to do for me, because I wasn’t able to access all the information and connect all the dots myself.
Maybe the reason why Nick and so many other literati are losing their patience with long form information is that it is so fundamentally inefficient and inferior to connected bits of information.
You look at a book, read a book, and you easily perceive a coherent whole. You look at all the information on that book’s topic on the web, all connected, and you can’t see the sum of the parts — but we are starting to get our minds around it. We can’t yet recognize the superiority of this networked thinking process because we’re measuring it against our old linear thought process.
-
-
27 Jun 08
-
26 Jun 08
-
Sources have forever complained about journalists quoting them out of context, and that’s exactly how I felt — yet if there had been a link, or a URL in print, I don’t think I would have felt that way.
-
-
23 Jun 08
-
Nick romanticizes the “contemplation” that comes with reading a book. But it’s possible that the output of our old contemplation can now be had in larger measure through a new entirely non-linear process.
-
-
ross harleynow that anyone can publish any thought or idea on the web, and anyone can link to it or reproduce it, the whole notion of quoting and citation has been completely turned on its head
-
22 Jun 08
-
20 Jun 08
-
19 Jun 08
-
Michel Bauwense blogstorm over AP trying to dictate how much of their content can be quoted on the web
-
18 Jun 08
Paul RyanThe problem with the AP isn’t really about linking, it’s about quoting. And the problem with quoting is that, now that anyone can publish any thought or idea on the web, and anyone can link to it or reproduce it, the whole notion of quoting and citati
digitalmedia journalism web blog media scottkarp publishing2.0
-
Martin Stabe"If The Atlantic, with its top shelf editorial standards, can [quote from a blogger's site without permission], then why can’t a blogger quote AP — almost as if the AP were a person?"
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.