This link has been bookmarked by 48 people . It was first bookmarked on 02 Jun 2009, by Lori Abrahams.
-
08 Mar 12
Tim HahnTwo of the more well-known brand names in education recently combined forces. Robert J. Marzano (wildly popular consultant/author/speaker) produced a report of a study he conducted of Promethean ActivClassroom (wildly popular interactive white board (IWB) technology).
-
04 Jan 12
-
27 Jun 11
-
27 Feb 11
-
17 Dec 10
Judy O'ConnellInterested "Interactive White Board" people. Check out Jon Becker's look at Marzano's study: http://bit.ly/11zetZ
-
28 Jul 10
Brendan Murphy@mbteach ask them if they read this yet. I'm sure the Promethean people will mention the Marzano study. http://ow.ly/4pUbj
marzano research promethean interactive whiteboards educational smartboard iwb critique criticism
-
13 Jun 10
-
13 May 10
-
02 May 10
-
13 Mar 10
-
26 Feb 10
-
Karl Fisch"Marzano’s work has not yet been formally reviewed by any “peers” (at least as far as I can tell). While I am very critical of the way peer-review is typically conceived and carried out in academia, there is real value in the process. Therefore, I’m using this space to do just that. This first post is a bit of an introduction. In subsequent posts, I’ll address methodological and analytical issues.
In this first post, I’ll try to do two things simultaneously: address a key criticism and establish some semblance of credibility as a reviewer" -
29 Jan 10
Steve J. Moore"Two of the more well-known brand names in education recently combined forces. Robert J. Marzano (wildly popular consultant/author/speaker) produced a report of a study he conducted of Promethean ActivClassroom (wildly popular interactive white board (IWB) technology)."
-
19 Jan 10
-
10 Jan 10
-
08 Jan 10
-
06 Jan 10
-
13 Nov 09
-
07 Nov 09
Janice StearnsI saw Marzano's presentation on his research of IWB's (Promethean) and their impact on the classroom at the CUE 08 conference and immediately suspected that it was wrong. This detailed analysis of the report by Jonathan Becker analyzes the faulty research in this project.
-
27 Oct 09
-
24 Oct 09
-
19 Oct 09
koroghcm usFirst part of a five part review on one research study concerning the use of interactive whiteboards. Has some good points about research flaws. More important, has some ideas concerning making a better research study. The comments on all five parts are worth reading for more ideas and commentary.
-
18 Oct 09
-
28 Jun 09
-
25 Jun 09
-
10 Jun 09
-
09 Jun 09
-
08 Jun 09
-
07 Jun 09
Tod BakerWhile I am very critical of the way peer-review is typically conceived and carried out in academia, there is real value in the process. Therefore, I’m using this space to do just that. This first post is a bit of an introduction. In subsequent posts, I’ll address methodological and analytical issues.
-
04 Jun 09
Sarah HanawaldSo--what does the research on IWB's say? Marzano says a lot. So does Promethean. Here, Jon Becker takes a look at what they are both saying.
-
03 Jun 09
-
02 Jun 09
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.