Skip to main content

Diigo Home

Studies Explore Whether the Internet Makes Students Better Writers - Chronicle... - The Diigo Meta page

chronicle.com/...39writing.htm - Cached - Annotated View

Public Stiky Notes

  • kreliz
    Elizabeth Koh on 2009-06-23
    Interesting. I agree that writing on social networking sites, messaging etc promotes short and crisp messages without much elaboration.
  • lbutler
    L Butler on 2009-06-24
    However, it would be awesome if there was a crossover ... we know students enjoy posting and texting. Instead of fear and hate, teachers should appreciate the informal style and encourage students to continue their education outside of the classroom.
  • willrich
    Will Richardson on 2009-06-18
    This isn't surprising, is it?
  • mrshawke
    Jo Hawke on 2009-06-23
    My husband always says practice only makes perfect if one practices perfectly. :P
  • ransomtech
    Steve Ransom on 2009-06-22
    It's not just about writing more words. There lots of room for very bad, uninformed, misinformed, and naive prolific writing.
  • budtheteacher
    Bud Hunt on 2009-06-18
    NAEP measures "academic writing." Wouldn't it be useful to have assessments of non-academic writing? I suspect we'd see big gains in active readers/writers/thinkers.
  • willrich
    Will Richardson on 2009-06-18
    I just find this so disingenuous. First of all, what are we assessing in order to find out if there has been improvement? Second of all, I just hate how he blames the kids.
  • budtheteacher
    Bud Hunt on 2009-06-18
    Is it lost, or rarely considered, particularly when the assumption is that all future writing will also be "academic"?
  • willrich
    Will Richardson on 2009-06-18
    I agree.
  • kreliz
    Elizabeth Koh on 2009-06-23
    This new media writing is more about communicating rather than academic writing. I had a communication skills class in University which was useful and similar to these styles of writing.
  • willrich
    Will Richardson on 2009-06-18
    I love that: The new normal.
  • kreliz
    Elizabeth Koh on 2009-06-23
    agree with Will. Great idea.
  • willrich
    Will Richardson on 2009-06-18
    Great information literacy exercise.
  • willrich
    Will Richardson on 2009-06-18
    Not sure why we can't do both.
  • ransomtech
    Steve Ransom on 2009-06-22
    I would agree. Certain kinds of writing require a foundation of understanding in order to build logical arguments and demonstrate an understanding of underlying issues/concepts. Writing can be spontaneous and creative, but it must also be a natural reaction to learning.
  • budtheteacher
    Bud Hunt on 2009-06-18
    Yancey says that one of the reasons we're often more reading centric in our curricula is that there are control issues at play - easier to control consumption than creation - and what happens when people create things we don't "like?"
  • willrich
    Will Richardson on 2009-06-18
    Interesting observation
  • willrich
    Will Richardson on 2009-06-18
    Yes, Yes, Yes.

Page Comments

  • budtheteacher
    Bud Hunt on 2009-06-18
    Recognizing the difficulty of the task is the first step towards actually meaningfully addressing it.
  • budtheteacher
    Bud Hunt on 2009-06-18
    That assumption - that academic writing is the only writing worth studying - is an example of the paradigm problem - assuming that we want students to all succeed at our task, and not their own. We'd better define our, and their tasks, and study both of them. (Or all of them - both is a limiting word.)

Would you like to comment?

Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.