Republican voters are actually split in their views about climate change. A look at public opinion among Republicans over the past few years finds a more complex – and divided – Republican electorate. For this study, we combined the results from six of our nationally-representative surveys over the past three years, which provided enough data for an in-depth analysis of the diversity of views about global warming within the Republican party.
We find that solid majorities of self-identified moderate and liberal Republicans – who comprise 30% of the party – think global warming is happening (62% and 68% respectively). By contrast, 38% of conservative Republicans think global warming is happening. At the extreme, Tea Party Republicans (17% of the party) are the most dismissive – only 29% think global warming is happening.
Shell and BP have been forced to accept shareholder demands to be much more transparent about the impact of their activities on climate change issues at annual general meetings in recent weeks.
And amid the latest sign of sweeping changes, the energy minister of the world’s number one oil exporter, Saudi Arabia, admitted his country could wean itself off fossil fuels completely within 25 years.
Van Beurden said Shell, along with “a majority of society”, acknowledged climate change was a real and serious issue. He said it was highly undesirable that the world moved beyond 2C.
But he argued that talk of a “carbon bubble”, where a large portion of fossil fuel reserves were overvalued because they could not be used, was simplistic: it was necessary to differentiate between higher carbon assets such as coal and lower C02 ones such as gas.
Reserve reports for 2015 won’t be published until early next year, and will be the first real test of how the undeveloped wells stand up to lower prices.
“The oil hasn’t disappeared,” said Hirs of Hillhouse Resources. “It’s always been in the ground, but the company that booked the reserves may not be around anymore to drill it.”
Saudi Arabia's oil minister has said the country will switch its energy focus to solar power as the nation envisages an end to fossil fuels, possibly around 2040-2050, Reuters reports.
"In Saudi Arabia, we recognise that eventually, one of these days, we are not going to need fossil fuels, I don't know when, in 2040, 2050... so we have embarked on a program to develop solar energy," Ali Al-Naimi told a business and climate conference in Paris, the news service reports.
"Hopefully, one of these days, instead of exporting fossil fuels, we will be exporting gigawatts, electric ones. Does that sound good?"
Reuters reports that the minster added that he still expected the world's energy mix to be dominated by fossil fuels in the near future.
The Boston Globe adds that the minister said oil prices as low as $US30-$40 a barrel would not make solar power uneconomic.
By McKENZIE FUNK MAY 18, 2015
Shell’s internal research showed that alternative energy systems — wind, solar, carbon capture — would take decades to make just a 1-percent dent in our massive global energy system, even if they grew at 25 percent a year. “It takes them 30 years to just begin to start becoming material,” Bentham explained to me.
One scenario, called “Blueprints,” painted a moderately hopeful vision of green energy and concerted action within the constraints of technological change, of a swiftly rising price on carbon emissions as the world comes together to remake its energy systems. In this vision of the future, there is active carbon trading. There is a strong global climate treaty. There is still far more warming than society can easily bear — approaching 7 degrees Fahrenheit — but the world still averts the very worst of climate change.
The second scenario, called “Scramble,” envisioned a future in which countries fail to do much of anything to reduce emissions, and instead race to secure oil and coal deposits. Only when climatic chaos breaks out does society take it seriously, and by then great damage has already been done. Drilling in the Arctic, thought to hold up to a quarter of the world’s untapped oil and gas, has a role in both scenarios — but under “Scramble,” it is irresistible.
Mayor Tom Barrett appointed Rocky Marcoux to serve as Commissioner for the Department of City Development in 2004. Under his direction, the department has focused its land and economic development tools to leverage more than 11,000 jobs and strengthen neighborhoods throughout Milwaukee. . . . Described as part bull-dog & part evangelist, Marcoux is an advocate for Milwaukee's future and a passionate promoter of the city's assets and opportunities.
Much of the money came from Peter Thiel’s Founder’s Fund, which was a perfect fit since the organization has the ability to be patient with its investments. And Transatomic Power’s technology is likely at least 10 years away from being able to show any sort of return on investment. . . . .Basically, we’re all working together in opposition to fossil fuels. That’s the real fight.”
Crowdfunding - on sites I hadn't heard of . . . . "We couldn’t precisely define our investor targets until we began fundraising. Then we quickly learned that our offering appeals to accredited angel investors seeking high-return potential with mitigated risk. . . ."
Current market conditions actually benefit our approach. Major producers today are primarily focused on drilling in shale formations, which comes with the considerable expense of fracking. Our reserves are in more traditional sandstone fields, which do not require the extensive fracking of shale operations. Plus, we can take advantage of idle equipment and service providers to keep costs down. Our break-even point is about $20 per barrel-much lower than the cost of producing a barrel of oil from shale. Even with higher oil prices, we'll have the advantage of being a low-cost producer.
more than 220 institutions have now committed to divesting since the climate campaign launched in 2012
“Talgo had set up its North American headquarters right here in Milwaukee to build trains for around the country. For us, Talgo was the beginning and that rug has been pulled out from underneath us,” Barrett says.
The company seemed slated for success a few years ago.
The city’s plan calls for the creation of fifteen family-supporting jobs for every acre of redevelopment.
We want to see really good businesses out here that create jobs,” Timm says.
The Advanced Energy for Life website where Jing plays a starring role was launched in February 2104. Peabody says it has three objectives: combatting the crisis of global energy poverty, increasing access to low-cost electricity, and reducing emissions using today’s advanced ‘clean coal’ technologies.
Campaigners say it is merely the latest example of the company’s efforts to blur the connection between climate change and coal.
he ravages of climate change could severely hurt the ability of utilities in the 11 Western states to generate power unless they “climate proof” their power grid using renewables and energy efficiency, something they are not prepared for, according to a new study.
For nearly half of the West’s existing power plants, climate change could reduce their ability to produce electricity by up to 3 percent during an average summer and possibly up to nearly 9 percent during a decade-long drought,
In this turbulent underwater canyon, nearly 15,000 feet (4,550 meters) below the surface, the scientists spotted a set of more than 250 consecutive crashing waves, similar to surfer's waves. It's the longest train of these special billows, called Kelvin-Helmholtz waves, ever seen in the sea, said lead study author Hans van Haren, an oceanographer at the NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research in Den Burg, Netherlands.
Most people buy rooftop solar panels because they think it will save them money or make them green, or both. But the truth is that rooftop solar shouldn’t be saving them money (though it often does), and it almost certainly isn’t green. In fact, the rooftop-solar craze is wasting billions of dollars a year that could be spent on greener initiatives. It also is hindering the growth of much more cost-effective renewable sources of power.
According to a recent Energy Department-backed study at North Carolina State University, installing a fully financed, average-size rooftop solar system will reduce energy costs for 93% of the single-family households in the 50 largest American cities today. That’s why people have been rushing out to buy rooftop solar panels, particularly in sunny states like Arizona, California and New Mexico.
The primary reason these small solar systems are cost-effective, however, is that they’re heavily subsidized.
There is debate about the plan's constitutionality, but none whatsoever about its lack of benefits. The EPA itself admits that the plan's utility against the threat of climate change will be so small (reducing warming by 0.016 degrees Fahrenheit over the next century) that it will be impossible to measure.
. . .
Congress considered, and rejected, the president’s cap-and-trade scheme, notwithstanding Democratic supermajorities in both chambers. The EPA has now figured how to impose it anyway, turning one of the most obscure and little-used provisions of the Clean Air Act one of the most ambitious regulations in the history of the administrative state.
By Gary Gutting and Dale Jamieson May 18, 2015
This interview, the fourth in a series on political topics, discusses philosophical issues that underlie recent debates about climate change. My interviewee is Dale Jamieson, a professor of environmental studies and philosophy at New York University. He is the author of “Reason in a Dark Time: Why the Struggle to Stop Climate Change Failed — and What It Means for Our Future.” — Gary Gutting
. . .
D.J.: Climate change is here, and it’s only going to get worse. But it matters how much worse it will get. . . . . The great climate scientist Wally Broecker once said that the climate system is an angry beast and we are poking it with sticks.. . . Carbon remains in the atmosphere for centuries. Someday it may be possible for us to withdraw carbon from the atmosphere and reduce the warming. There are many unknowns about this and we are very far from being able to do it now in a safe way at a reasonable cost and on the scale required. . . . .
D.J.: I think we need to think ambitiously about what a morality would be like that was adequate to the problems we face in a high-population, densely interconnected world undergoing radical climate change. At the same time philosophers don’t invent moralities that people then go out and adopt. We need to figure out how people can act from within their existing moral psychologies in a way that is both more environmentally friendly and will help to give them meaning in a world that is so different from the one in which most of our values were created.
. . .
When it comes to fundamental change law tends to follow politics and morality rather than leading them.
Company obtained loan from WEDC, unsuccessful elsewhere. Wsj playing up as a scandal - call in program at noon.