Skip to main contentdfsdf

Wslee_6's List: Sociology

    • new middle class
    • squeezed

    33 more annotations...

    • inequality with race and ethnicity
    • Human progress never rolls on the wheels of inevitability.

    5 more annotations...

    • homosexuality is a “sexual addiction and dependency,” not a condition to be socially accepted and celebrated.
    • vehemently insist that this journey I've taken is harmful.

    22 more annotations...

    • does not justify
    • pride and an honor

    20 more annotations...

    • ideas and behaviour
    • decline

    63 more annotations...

    • structural functionalism
    • functional imperatives

    29 more annotations...

    • psychiatrist Nathaniel S. Lehrman
    • Task Force on Religion and Mental Health

    1 more annotation...

    • higher standard of living than the lower-middle class
    • high degree of autonomy

    31 more annotations...

    • like to blame the one-percenters
    • trickle-down financial boosts

    21 more annotations...

    • belief
    • people and/or phenomenon

    30 more annotations...

    • but rather
    • not of the ambition of personal individualis

    15 more annotations...

    • perpetuated through social institutions
    • shaped and structured by the powerful

    7 more annotations...

    • Wenzhou
    • yet still see religion and its symbols as affronts to the party’s atheism.

    82 more annotations...

    • all had deviance

    21 more annotations...

    • base determines the superstructure in a one-way relationship
    • totality

    29 more annotations...

    • prostitutes for the capitalists
    • slaving away on an hourly wage

    11 more annotations...

    • Since religion is an important component of the social actors' world-view, religious beliefs can direct social action, and hence bring about social change
      • Why direct social action straightaway leads to social change?? Then does it lead to social conflict before leading to social change?

    • conducive

    5 more annotations...

    • one must belong to a “race”.
      • The Chinese-Malay-Indian-Others (CMIO) model has outlived its usefulness
        Why does Singapore still insist on categorising people by race into these four buckets?
        Some have suggested that the most important reason is for HDB ethnic quotas. But in a global city it makes little sense to maintain ethnic quotas in HDB housing estates, when little ethnic enclaves have formed all over the country, for instance with rich North Indians in Tanjong Rhu and the East Coast.
        Others suggest that social welfare and self-help groups, like Mendaki and Sinda, were founded on ethnic lines and must continue this way. Without ethnic classifications, so the argument goes, who would help the poor Malays and Indians?

        I have two critiques of this argument. First, there are many more civil society organisations operating in Singapore today without an ethnic mandate. Why doesn’t Singapore, as a global city, start to channel charity money towards them rather than race-based groups?

        Second, immigration has dented the analytical underpinnings of these groupings. In particular, let’s consider “Indians”. A little-known fact in Singapore is that Indians are now the richest ethnic group here in terms of resident household incomes. Many people assume the Chinese are. But from 2000 to 2010 the Indians’ average monthly household income recorded nominal average annual growth of 5.2% to reach $7,664, overtaking the Chinese (3.4% and S$7,326 respectively). 4

        Using a traditional CMIO lens, one might conclude that the Indians in Singapore have been developing very rapidly. However, although the data is not readily available, I suspect that much of this growth is due to high-income Indian immigrants who have taken Singapore citizenship, rather than any marked organic improvement in the fortunes of Singaporean Indians.

        These two groups—new Indian immigrants and older Singaporean Indians—are infinitely different. The fact that they are clobbered together and analysed is a reductionist move that can only lead to poor policy-formulation.

        The CMIO model then has become a drag on Singapore’s efforts to create a global city. It immediately limits the identities of locals while occasionally enforcing parochial notions of what a Singaporean should be. Perhaps it is better then to dispense with the CMIO model for one that acknowledges the demographics of a global city, with all its cultural and linguistic diversity.

    • comes with a caveat

    13 more annotations...

1 - 20 of 44 Next › Last »
20 items/page
List Comments (0)