Dropbox is £74 for 50Gb; sugar sync is £62 for 60Gb. So about average.
Apple could make it a lot cheaper than these guys if they wanted to cause they own the server farms
Of course this would be annoying for windows users, although you can download, modify and upload back in. Still annoying, but Apple doesn't really care.
I don't think this is a move to push sales of Pages, etc, it's just a better implementation for Apple users.
An interesting move from Apple. leaves behind their initial google docs-like implementation.
I think this is much better. Let's face it, when you access the site, you're going there with some sort of a computer. Is it not better than having to edit the stuff in a browser?
It is obvious that this will be the case for video soon as well.
In the UK, nop!
Our Apple TVs don't even show a TV Shows section.
And the service of streaming downloaded shows is not available in any device in the UK.
It will not be free obviously
what was the problem. I would argue, they would sell more if the preview was full.
Look at youtube. When I really like something I will go and buy it even though I could see it all on youtube. Guess what...if it was not there or only tiny bits of it, I would not be sucked in.
Looks fantastic. You can have a chat box over the video call. It uses the same UI has the iPad Facebook app, mail or many other apps wi a column on the left hand side.
David Pogue of The New York Times summed it up by saying:
“this is one of the most elegant, fluid, impressive apps you've ever seen. It's a showpiece for the new world of touch-screen gadgets.”
Why has safari doubled in users?
What a journey has chrome had.
although we have no details about what the lawsuit might be about.
With so much pressure lately, I have to think plans for reform on patents laws are being thought of.