Skip to main contentdfsdf

Jill Sipe's List: Favorite Educational Websites

  • Jan 12, 10

    Great website for teaching core Democratic values.

      • Not a good site for the visually impaired. No alternative text for any of the pictures and the drop down menu makes it extremely hard for anyone with physical difficulties to pick the desired link.

      Add Sticky Note
      • With 20 Errors, and 3 warnings from the markup validation tool, this site proves to be a nightmare for the visually impaired. Good web design MUST accommodate all viewers.

      Add Sticky Note
    • Content
      Authority and Update information can be found at: http://whois.domaintools.com/americanepic.org
      Excellent website professionally created and maintained. American Epic meets all of the agreed upon criteria for content including correct spelling, grammar, sentence structure, relevance of pictures, and diversity in content presentation.
      Site's aim and value is communicated on the home page.
      Content, vocabulary and concepts are appropriate for the target group. Content is engaging and relevant.
      Information is well organized and intuitive.
      Navigational links are well placed and consistent throughout the site.
      - Jill Sipe on 2010-02-08
    • Technical
      Does not use an internal search engine but categories are easy to understand and navigate. Drop down menu is not user friendly for physically challenged or visually impaired users.
      Images load in timely manner
      No broken links
      Alt tags are available on most images.
      Consistency on every page: logos, tabs to move around
      Layout is organized
      - Jill Sipe on 2010-02-08
      • My students think of this site as a reward! They LOVE it! Especially check out the thinking games!

      Add Sticky Note
    • Content
      Authority and Update information can be found at: http://www.networksolutions.com/whois-search/iknowthat.com
      Excellent website professionally created and maintained. “I Know That” meets all of the agreed upon criteria for content including correct spelling, grammar, sentence structure, relevance of pictures, and diversity in content presentation.
      Site's aim and value is communicated on the home page.
      Content, vocabulary and concepts are appropriate for the target group.
      Information is well organized and intuitive.
      Navigational links are well placed and consistent throughout the site.
      - Jill Sipe on 2010-02-08
    • Technical
      Does not use an internal search engine but categories are easy to understand and navigate.
      Images load in timely manner
      No broken links
      Alt tags are available on all images.
      Consistency on every page: logos, tabs to move around
      Layout is organized
      Accessibility standards are met and are not related to the browser used or how experienced is the user.
      - Jill Sipe on 2010-02-08
      • I loved this site as an introductory lesson for dissecting the real thing. The kids had a great handle on the material because of this site when they got to the science lab.

      Add Sticky Note
  • Jan 16, 10

    I use this site every year with my students. The site is getting better but needs work to be more age/grade relevant and engaging.

      • Good web design should include accessibility for all viewers. This site has big gaps in accessibility due to the absence of alternative text for all of the pictures.

      Add Sticky Note
    • Content
      Authority by the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children and Boys & Girls Clubs of America.
      Latest Update: 2010
      Good website that meets all of the agreed upon criteria for content including correct spelling, grammar, sentence structure, relevance of pictures, and diversity in content presentation.
      Site's aim and value is communicated on the home page.
      Content, vocabulary and concepts are appropriate for the target group.
      Information is well organized and intuitive.
      Navigational links are well placed and consistent throughout the site.
      - Jill Sipe on 2010-02-08
    • Technical
      Annoying audio on start up.
      Does not use an internal search engine but categories are easy to understand and navigate.
      Heavily reliant on FLASH would be a problem for dial up users
      Images load in timely manner
      No broken links
      Alt tags are rarely used
      Consistency on every page: logos, tabs to move around
      Layout is organized
      Accessibility standards are not met. Screen reader was no help for visually impaired.
      Site holds the user captive by not allowing the back button to navigate out of NetSmartz. Not nice!
      - Jill Sipe on 2010-02-08
  • OLogy 1

    Jan 17, 10

    Very fun and exciting interactive science website for kids.

      • This site is visually impaired person's nightmare! None of the links have alternative text to direct the visually impaired to where they may want to go.

      Add Sticky Note
    • Content
      Authority by American Museum of Natural History
      Update information not available
      Excellent website professionally created and maintained. “Ology” meets all of the agreed upon criteria for content including correct spelling, grammar, sentence structure, relevance of pictures, and diversity in content presentation.
      Site's aim and value is communicated on the home page.
      Content, vocabulary and concepts are appropriate for the target group.
      Information is well organized and intuitive.
      Navigational links are well placed and consistent throughout the site.
      Content extremely fun and engaging for target audience.
      - Jill Sipe on 2010-02-08
    • Technical
      Does not use an internal search engine but categories are easy to understand and navigate.
      Images load in timely manner
      No broken links
      When images are turned off, page becomes a nightmare. Very few alt tags are used for images.
      Text is not readable by screen reader.
      Consistency on every page: logos, tabs to move around
      Layout is organized
      Accessibility standards are not met for visually impaired.
      Reliance on colors make site unreadable for color blind users.
      - Jill Sipe on 2010-02-08
1 - 6 of 6
20 items/page
List Comments (0)