Subjective intent is irrelevant in a search and seizure case to determining
whether governmental conduct violated a defendants Fourth Amendment rights
and, therefore, has no bearing on the remedy granted in such a case.11 Similarly,
violations of a defendants constitutional rights that do not involve a structural
error in the proceedings require a harmless error analysis. If the government can
show beyond a reasonable doubt that the violation did not contribute to the
conviction, then the court may not grant a remedy despite the violation.12
Therefore, the Constitution does not provide a remedy to deter future
prosecutorial misconduct, absent a finding of harm to the defendant
", concluding that the Navarros failed to offer any
evidence of a County
policy or custom of treating domestic violence 911 calls differently from
non-domestic violence 911 calls, nor any
evidence of a County
policy or custom of depriving residents in minority neighborhoods of equal
police protection, nor any
evidence of the
Sheriff's deliberate or conscious indifference
to the rights
of abused women or residents in minority neighborhoods.
2
The Navarros now appeal."
These elementary principles establish the government's obligation to provide medical care for those whom it is punishing by incarceration. An inmate must rely on prison authorities to treat his medical needs
This is Google's cache of http://home.earthlink.net/~malfeasance/id23.html. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on Jun 22, 2010 22:26:17 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more
Text-only versionThese terms only appear in links pointing to this page: http www vsb org profguides actions_jul06 dec06 html
Citizens' Demand For An Investigation of Criminal Conspiracy by Beltway Attorneys and Judges
Ib. Affidavit in Support of Criminal Complaint for Conspiracy
Home | Letter to Congress on the Denial of the Right to Impartial Judicial Review of Misprision of a Felony | Our Purpose | Aug. 28, 2009 Letters to Preseident Obama and Gov. Kaine to Direct Response to Petition for Cert. | U.S. Supreme Court Petition for Cert. to DC Circuit to Oppose Disbarment based on VSBDB Void Order | I. Transmittal Letter to Federal Criminal Complaint Filed in the District of Columbia | Ia. D.C. CRIMINAL COMPLAINT FOR CONSPIRACY BY JUDGES, GOVERNMENT AND BELTWAY LOBBYIST/ATTORNEYS | Ib. Affidavit in Support of Criminal Complaint for Conspiracy | Ic. MEMO IN SUPPORT OF COMPLAINT TO INDICT JUDGES FOR CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY DEPRIVING FATHER OF RIGHTS | II. Transmittal Letter to Federal Criminal Complaint filed E.D. of Virgina | III. Transmittal Letter to Federal Criminal Complaint In Pennsylvania for Misprision of a Felony | IV. Transmittal Letter Federal Criminal Complaint Filed in Colorado for Obstruction of Justice. | V. TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO CRIMINAL COMPLAINT FOR JUDGES CABRANES ET AL. VIOLATING VOID ORDER DOCTRINE | Becoming a Member | Contact Us | Calendar of Events | Members Page | Newsletter | Links
United States District Court District of Columbia ________________________________________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
John G. Roberts, et al.,
________________________________________________)
AFFIDAVIT OF PROBABLE CAUSE IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
I. INTRODUCTION
1. I am a Citizen of the United States, a resident of Virginia and
Lee Frank and Nye Frank were accused of a crime, without right to defend