Sandbrook, Dominic. "After the Revolution." New Statesman (London, England) Vol. 138, No. 4933. Jan. 26 2009: 30-35. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 29 Apr 2012.
Introduction
For the past few decades the United States has grown to know Iran as a hostile nation. Their relations then deteriorated to a point where they decided to respectively withdraw their ambassadors from both countries. Ironically, this relation, used to be peaceful but was swiftly ruined by the return of one man, Ruhollah Musavi Khomeini. The new leader took immediate actions and changed Iran in a matter of weeks. This dramatic and abrupt change definitely caused a few key repercussions that greatly impacted the flow of History.
Common Knowledge (Description of event)
Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini who was exiled in 1964 from Iran, fled for Iraq for Iraq but eventually got kicked out by Saddam Hussein and left for France. This ended up being a blessing in disguise because he now possessed better means of communicating with the rebel groups in Iran. After much pressure from the 1979 protests the Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi, the Ex-Monarch of Iran left the country on January 15th 1979 for Egypt to apparently get further treatment. On the 1st of February 1979, the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini returned after his 15 year exile. There was much celebration; primarily because the people thought that he would become their spiritual leader and that Iran would finally become a democracy. He ended up reigning until he died in 1989.
Description of the Event
Sandbrook, Dominic. "After the Revolution." New Statesman (London, England) Vol. 138, No. 4933. Jan. 26 2009: 30-35. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 29 Apr 2012.
Print Information (Description of Event)
The History of Iran by Elton L. Daniel:
- From January 23rd 1979 until the 16th of February people deserted the army, the navy and even the air-force. More protests and riots followed and by February 16th 1979 the Shah's last troops had been completely defeated. pg. 182-183
- Three Million people awaited Khomeini's return. pg. 175
- On 5th of February and the Islamic Revolutionary Circle (IRC) created a provisional government that would be ruled by Mehdi Bazargan. pg. 183
- Bazargan had no control and Khomeini was the uncontested leader. Bazargan had to ask Khomeini for authorization to do most key decisions. pg. 184
Revolution in Iran by Akbar Hussein:
- To show how Bazargan is powerless: Bazargan denounced the killing of the Shah's subordinates; of which he had no control over. pg49
- Use this quote to reflect Bazargan's inability to make a change: "I am a knife without a blade'. pg 49
- Iran amended the 1905 constitution and Khomeini became the unquestionable dictator of Iran. He now possessed absolute power over the:
- Executive
- Legislative
- Judicial branches pg.49
Common Knowledge (Significance of Event)
Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini's return caused the previously pro-west Iran to become a Theocracy, solely becoming an Islamic State. Iran now wanted the Shah to return in Iran to be tried in Iranian courts to make sure he would not revert Iran to a pro-west state once again with a coup. When Iran asked President Carter if they could relinquish the Shah and send him to Iran, the Humanitarian President dismissed Iran's request. the impatient Muslim fundamentalist grew tired and decided to pressure the US, also known as the great Satan. They took hostage 52 Americans from the Embassy staff and held them hostage for 444 days. The Shah then left the US because of all the pressure and went to Panama; he never set foot back in Iran. Later on, in 1980, Saddam Hussein tried to take advantage of Iran's instability and attacked. This then became known as the Iran-Iraq war which lasted form 1980 to 1988. This war caused Iran to lose 1 million people. During this war the US publicly supported Iraq but secretly they were selling weapons to Iran in order to accomplish two things. Firstly, they wanted to use the money to fund the Communists in the Contras. Secondly, they wanted to make Hezbollah's patron pressure Hezbollah to release the hostages in Lebanon. Even though there were a couple of secret deals the US and Iran, to this day, have no diplomatic relations between each other. This hostility was openly pronounced by G.W. Bush when he stated that Iran was part of the Axis of Evil.
Overall we can say that this return is significant because it made Iran a theocracy and an anti-west nation. This return, furthermore, increased the hatred for one another. Additionally, It funded the Contras in Nicaragua. It created a war that caused over 1 million deaths. This war also caused Iraq and Iran to have more rancor against each other. Without a doubt Hezbollah would have been a lot weaker if Iran would have kept its pro-west stance and not have funded them.
Significance of the Event
"Background Notes: Iran." Background Notes. Feb 2012: n.p. SIRS Government Reporter. Web. 29 Apr 2012.
This can be used to explain the flow of events that then succeeded and how maybe they could have been prevented if Khomeini never returned
Print Source (Significance of event)
The Revolution in Iran:
- April 1st 1979 Iran became an Islamic Republic. pg 49
- The Hostage Crisis: It is uncertain if Khomeini knew about the plan but he wholeheartedly endorsed it. pg 51-52
- On November 6 it was the last straw for Bazargan, he resigned after failing at liberating the hostages. pg 52
- With his resignation flew away the hopes of Iran becoming a liberal and religious democracy
- On April 25 1980 the US attempted to rescue the hostages but it was a failure. They sent six C-130 planes and eight Helicopters. Three Helicopters were severely damaged and a fourth crashed with one of the C-130 planes. pg 52
Conclusion
This coup was extremely controversial but nonetheless no one can refute the following facts. Khomeini’s upcoming caused a decline in Iran’s economy, failing relations with many Western powers and many internal dilemmas within the country. These instabilities then resulted in a war against Iraq. This succession of disastrous events have greatly changed the way the West now looks at Iran, as they used to be friendly with them. Unfortunately, the tides have turned and today even the United Nations is having trouble negotiating treaties to stop the Nuclear Development of the unresponsive nation.
Works Cited
"Background Notes: Iran." Background Notes. Feb 2012: n.p. SIRS Government Reporter. Web. 29 Apr 2012.
Daniel, Elton L.. The History of Iran. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 2001. Print.
Husain, Akbar. The Revolution in Iran. Vero Beach, Fla.: Rourke Enterprises, 1988. Print.
Sandbrook, Dominic. "After the Revolution." New Statesman (London, England) Vol. 138, No. 4933. Jan. 26 2009: 30-35. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 29 Apr 2012.