Author of the article shows that the article is original and open about who is responsible for it.
The article, as well as the website, looks very credible and the evidence I've found supports this. I rate this article and source 'excellent'
Author of the article shows that the article is original and open about who is responsible for it.
Looks like there is a news team specifically for Atlanta. This makes me think that the source has people all over to cover news stories.
With credit to the author, a small bio, copyrights, and retweets I am comfortable to say that this article and source is fully reliable for news-related information. I rate this source 'excellent'.
Author shown with a picture of her AND a link to her twitter. Seems pretty open to be fake. There are also buttons to retweet, like, etc. the article on the page with 438 retweets. Seems reliable enough to retweet.
Credit to the photographer.
BBC is a trusted source of information, but I didn't see the author's name, or credit to the photographers for the photos used. I would rate this article 'good'.
Date and time of last update on article. No sign of the author's name yet.
With few indications for credibility, I have also noticed that there is only ONE Facebook share and no retweets or anything. Overall, I give this article a 'fair'.
Date and time of article. I'm not sure if "AFP RELAXNEWS" is the department or something that wrote the article, but I don't see a specific name yet.
Credit to the photo. Unlike BBC.
Unfortunately for USA Today, I cannot highlight the copyright because of the page's layout. The site looks genuine and there are retweets as well as credit to photos and interviews with the game's designer. I give this source an 'excellent', but I rate the page layout 'fair'
Credit to the photo used, very legit.