Skip to main contentdfsdf

Greg Morga's List: Political Theory Paper

    • DAWKINS: Yes. For centuries the most powerful argument for God's existence from the physical world was the so-called argument from design: Living things are so beautiful and elegant and so apparently purposeful, they could only have been made by an intelligent designer. But Darwin provided a simpler explanation. His way is a gradual, incremental improvement starting from very simple beginnings and working up step by tiny incremental step to more complexity, more elegance, more adaptive perfection. Each step is not too improbable for us to countenance, but when you add them up cumulatively over millions of years, you get these monsters of improbability, like the human brain and the rain forest. It should warn us against ever again assuming that because something is complicated, God must have done it.
    • DAWKINS: I think that's a tremendous cop-out. If God wanted to create life and create humans, it would be slightly odd that he should choose the extraordinarily roundabout way of waiting for 10 billion years before life got started and then waiting for another 4 billion years until you got human beings capable of worshipping and sinning and all the other things religious people are interested in.
    • Richard Dawkins, perhaps its foremost polemicist, has just come out with The God Delusion (Houghton Mifflin), the rare volume whose position is so clear it forgoes a subtitle. The five-week New York Times best seller (now at No. 8) attacks faith philosophically and historically as well as scientifically, but leans heavily on Darwinian theory
    • Dawkins is riding the crest of an atheist literary wave. In 2004, The End of Faith, a multipronged indictment by neuroscience grad student Sam Harris, was published (over 400,000 copies in print). Harris has written a 96-page follow-up, Letter to a Christian Nation, which is now No. 14 on the Times list. Last February, Tufts University philosopher Daniel Dennett produced Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon, which has sold fewer copies but has helped usher the discussion into the public arena.

    1 more annotation...

  • Apr 13, 09

    "The Reforms of Urukagina". History-world.org. http://history-world.org/reforms_of_urukagina.htm.

    • Urukagina (reigned ca. 2380 BC2360 BC, short chronology), alternately rendered as Uruinimgina or Irikagina, was a ruler (énsi) of the city-state Lagash in Mesopotamia. He is best known for his reforms to combat corruption, which are sometimes cited as the first example of a legal code in recorded history. Although the actual text has not been discovered yet, much of its content may be surmised from other references to it that have been found. In it, he exempted widows and orphans from taxes; compelled the city to pay funeral expenses (including the ritual food and drink libations for the journey of the dead into the lower world); and decreed that the rich must use silver when purchasing from the poor, and if the poor does not wish to sell, the powerful man (the rich man or the priest) cannot force him to do so.[1]
    • J.L.
       Arsuaga et al, "Three New Human Skulls from the Sima de los Huesos Middle
       Pleistocene site in Sierra de Atapuerca, Spain," Nature April 8, 1993, p 534.
    • United States (13.2% nonreligious according to ARIS study of 2001) and Australia (15% nonreligious).

    3 more annotations...

    • t was borne out this week by an Australian Bureau of Statistics collation of data from censuses on religious belief.

       

      The “No Religion” box was first proffered in the 1971 census and was selected by 6.7 per cent of people. In 2006 that had shot to nearly 20 per cent. It had overtaken all other categories except “Catholic”. But its trajectory is up and “Catholic” is down.

    • The 19.1 per cent who ticked “No Religion” probably under-states the number of the people who are agnostic, atheist or apathetic.

    2 more annotations...

    • No company was rich enough, no industry large enough, to carry off such an enterprise. The great telecom companies, which were supposed to wire up the digital revolution, were paralyzed by the uncertainties of funding the Net.
    • The immense sums of money supposedly required to fill the Net with content sent many technocritics into a tizzy.

    5 more annotations...

1 - 13 of 13
20 items/page
List Comments (0)