Interesting the the pioneers in this field, i.e. Wesch and Rheingold, are new to the teaching profession. Shows the difficulty of stubbornness with experienced teachers who are set in the mould.
Despite widespread technology use in schools an abundance of free and easily accessed information, gen-y has shown decreasing literacy and writing skills, and poorer results on standardized tests, particularly with historical info and facts.
Author doesn't not argue, but notes improvements have been made where teachers were trained to integrate technology into instruction.
Collection of scholarly posts regarding tech and education, included is Mike Wesh's blog
Author argues Web 2.0 will usher in a new era in education as teachers take hold of the reins of the technology, accepting things like social networking programs that have previously come with a negative stigma because of a lack of adult influence and supervision. Makes comparison with printing press, but as results have been slow to surface, we will take this opportunity to re-write the book on education which will yield the real success.
Author argues why teachers like Wesch and Hargadon are too optimistic about Web 2.0 revolutionizing education. His main argument revolves around Web 2.0's collaborative nature which is no different than project based teaching that has been around for years and shown marginal effectiveness. He notes that success relies upon teacher training and effective implementation of technology. This seems rather intuitive. Although in reality it is sad to note that, yes, many teachers will implement poor uses of technology and yield little success; but this is true for all teaching methods and should not scare us away from utilizing new and diverse tools and methods of teaching.
Professor bans laptops from classroom for two reasons: notes are done better and are more engaging when written by hand, having to summarize, paraphrase, and prioritize; as opposed to verbatim which often occurs with the speed of typing on a laptop. There's not cognitive interaction. Two, is the distraction factor which is very real. This is not different than other distractions students have found in the past, daydreaming, drawing, writing notes, etc. this is a classroom management issue and leads more to engaging students with meaningful activities rather than lecture.
Author argues that technology has not improve education results because we are still operating in the 'old' model, merely cramming some computers in the back for word processing, internet searching, and powerpoints. He argues that the model must be changed and will do so not head on, but from the outside in. Thus online learning. Online enrollments have gone from 45,000 to 1 million since 2001 and will lead the way for this new model, thus we must shaped this new online model as desired.
Computers have been around for two decades in schools.
We have spent over $60 billion on them.
Yet they have had little to no effect on learning in schools
Howard Rheingold outlines the structure for his class and rational. It's based on collaborative inquiry with a significant emphasis on using technology such as blogging and wikis to help facilitate the process and increase connection and communication. His arguments revolves around using inquiry and collaboration as a means for good learning, and that technology can help these practices succeed with ease in record keeping, research, and communication. He does note that he must "manage' the class, making mandatory expectations for blogging, collaboration, and presentation, and that only specific students at specific times may open their laptops in class for specific duties.
Interesting the the pioneers in this field, i.e. Wesch and Rheingold, are new to the teaching profession. Shows the difficulty of stubbornness with experienced teachers who are set in the mould.