"No one is as blind as someone who does not want to see."
"No one is as blind as someone who does not want to see."
"No one is as blind as someone who does not want to see."
"no legitimate scientific information that supports the statement that a fetus experiences pain."
the annual U.S. abortion rate is still above one million per year.
the annual U.S. abortion rate is still above one million per year.
the annual U.S. abortion rate is still above one million per year.
the annual U.S. abortion rate is still above one million per year.
the annual U.S. abortion rate is still above one million per year.
the annual U.S. abortion rate is still above one million per year.
"No one is as blind as someone who does not want to see."
"No one is as blind as someone who does not want to see."
"No one is as blind as someone who does not want to see."
"No one is as blind as someone who does not want to see."
"No one is as blind as someone who does not want to see."
"No one is as blind as someone who does not want to see."
"No one is as blind as someone who does not want to see."
"No one is as blind as someone who does not want to see."
But for a serious national medical institution to carefully compose and release an unqualified statement this obtuse is something else again.
"No one is as blind as someone who does not want to see."
It is no coincidence that the lead author of this inadequately researched article was co-authored by an a medical student (not a doctor) who was a lawyer for abortion activist from the National Abortion Rights Action League and a co-author who directs of one of the most active abortion clinic networks in the San Francisco area.
In a society that considers itself civilized, this is, in a word, unthinkable.