the American Legislative Exchange Council—a free-market, limited-government group
has had a significant influence in K-12 education through its model legislation and work with state lawmakers to promote such policies as private school vouchers and “parent trigger” laws.
ALEC opponents argue that in education and other areas, the group undermines states’ democratic process by letting corporate lobbyists vote on model legislation through vacation-type conferences attended by lawmakers who then use that legislation to shape their own bills.
Getting stuff on the cusp can mean that there is no peer review or due diligence to see if the methods/policies they are advocating are effective and backed by solid research.
Those task forces approve model legislation for lawmakers to use as they see fit in their states. The task forces meet as one, but the public-sector and private-sector members each have separate vote tallies for resolutions and model legislation.
What progress??
Just because they have taken an active role doesn't mean any of what they have done has resulted in improved student achievement.
all of its progress
The group’s opponents take sharp aim at what they see as the outsize influence of its model legislation.
Like the ALEC model bill, the parent-trigger laws on the books in Indiana and Texas don’t require public hearings, while Mississippi follows the ALEC model in not specifically allowing a local school board any authority over how a school is changed.