sexual sin= horrible punishment
----------------
"this is a story about individual guilt."
----------------
So this is a story about collective guilt, about how we are all responsible.
----------------
Oh, you're not religious? Then you are superstitious (-- "No I'm not at all, I'm just kind of OCD." Is that what the kids are calling it now?--) which means you don't deal in judgments but in root causes.
------------
But maybe taking responsibility for our collective sins is a noble, selfless act? No.
-------------
All media is state run media, especially when it's not.
--------------
A case study of individual vs. collective guilt.
--------------
Implied in every disaster movie is "starting over," but starting over isn't the consequence, but the premise: "in order to start over and do it right this time, we need a catastrophe."
---------------
The trick to understanding disaster movies, and life, is to realize that the reason bad things happen is that we partly guilty and partly wronged, fully at the mercy of other people who use us and manipulate us; but that we still retain almost infinite power to alter reality and prevent bad things from happening. And the reason that that is the reason is that the alternative is there is no reason.
-----------
"Easier to say "give me a clean slate" then to accept responsibility that your consequences suck and you need to work hard to fix this. Like throwing the chess board up in the air when you are losing.."
Spiritual abuse, which may be active or passive, can best be conceptualized on a continuum from terroristic to zero abuse. Severity is determined by intensity, age of onset, duration, and individual reaction.
The underlying issue in all forms of abuse is control.
A Revealing documentary about the most promising treatment modality for drug dependance available. It is the only substance we know, which is capable of blocking acute withdrawal in opioid addicts as well as cocaine and alcohol. Although the FDA decided in 1993 that Ibogaine showed enough signs of being an effective tool in the treatment of addiction, money is the problem; this natural occuring molecule cannot be patented and is not a maintenance drug with addictive properties; reason for the pharmaceutical industry not to invest in its development... Educate yourself about this unique tool!
And, of course, we all know about Sen. Larry Craig (R-ID) who sought sex in a Minneapolis airport men’s room by tapping his foot.
They represent full-fledged pathology that has devastating consequences for the LGBT community.
part of a pervasive pattern that strongly suggests that the most rabid homophobes are usually gay.
as allowing some other kind of activity that allows the government to obtain private information about people who have no link to a terrorism or espionage case.
-------------
[T]here are secret legal opinions controlling how Patriot Act is being interpreted — it’s just that they were issued by the national security court.
“In our judgment, when the legal interpretations of public statutes that are kept secret from the American public, the government is effectively relying on secret law,” they wrote.
[T]here are secret legal opinions controlling how Patriot Act is being interpreted — it’s just that they were issued by the national security court.
“In our judgment, when the legal interpretations of public statutes that are kept secret from the American public, the government is effectively relying on secret law,” they wrote.
Most economists believe strongly in their own superior intelligence and take themselves far too seriously. In his letter to Joseph Stiglitz, Kenneth Rogoff identified this problem: “One of my favourite stories is a lunch with you and Carl Shapiro - the two of you started discussing whether Paul Volcker merited your vote for a tenured appointment at Princeton. You turned to me and said, “Ken, you used to work for Volcker at the Fed. Tell me, is he really smart?” I responded “Well, he was arguably the greatest Federal Reserve Chairman of the twentieth century” To which you replied, “But is he smart like us?”
-------------
He has a big ego about his IQ and big personal ambitions, but he doesn't really have the overwhelming urge to bend other men to his will about other things.
----------------
The other part of him was in awe, in unconscious awe, of something the old boy had and he didn't: namely, the power to charm men and the manic drive to bend their wills into saying yes to projects they didn't want, didn't need, and never thought about before... And that thing was manhood. It was as simple as that."
And the one thing you wouldn’t be doing is negotiating because negotiating presumes compromise.
And you don’t compromise with Satan.
And the one thing you wouldn’t be doing is negotiating because negotiating presumes compromise.
And you don’t compromise with Satan.
Judge Seitz Spares Robert Ingham Further Sanctions
The Court referred Ingham to The Florida Bar for a psychological and competency evaluation because his conduct evidenced a fundamental incompetence and questionable connection with reality that can best be addressed through the pending discipline process.
As an idealistic law student and editor-in-chief of the Yale Law Journal, Kyle McAvoy has the promise of a highly successful career, although after graduation, he intends to devote three years to public service before applying for employment with a prestigious firm......two of Kyle's fraternity brothers, Joey Bernardo and Baxter Tate, are seen having sexual relations with Elaine Keenan, a coed who later claimed she was raped while unconscious....
The Confession is about the murder of a high school cheerleader and how an innocent man is arrested for it.
A little practice tip: go for the Mad Hatter matching stamp and envelope collection -- it really sends opposing counsel a message (that one of you is a crazy loon).
Keep 'em guessing, I always say!
It's a deadly game of blackmail. And they're making him play.
The question is whether an employment contract can include a requirement that the employee be enhanced with cybernetic implants should they be necessary to perform the functions of one’s job.
However, had I complained, what would have happened if the judge had then converted the guilty verdict to drunk driving, and left my client with an appeal as the only option (with the risks of a worse sentence if convicted on appeal)?