Malachi Smith's List: NWO-Science

• Climategate: Barack Obama's rule by EPA decree is a coup d'etat against Congress, made in Britain
• By Gerald Warner  World  Last updated: December 8th, 2009
• Who needs tanks on the lawn when you have the Environmental Protection Agency?
• Barack Obama’s use of the EPA to pressurise the Senate to pass his climate change Nuremberg Decrees shows his dictatorial mentality.
• He wants to override Congress, which is hostile to his climate gobbledegook because it is representative of the American electorate,
• and sideline the nation’s elected Senators by ruling by decree, courtesy of the EPA. This is a coup d’état.
• And what is the justification for this undemocratic action?
• The allegedly imminent threat from “Anthropogenic Global Warming”.
• There is always a supposed threat, when tyrants take the stage.
• The President of the United States has just reduced his moral authority to the level of any Third World dictator heading a “Government of National Emergency”.
• Fortunately, the world’s leading democracy, which he is trying to subvert, has guarantees of liberty so deeply embedded in its Constitution that US citizens are well placed to fight back.
• In the first place, regulation can be challenged in a way that laws cannot.
• So the EPA’s proposed ruling on so-called “Greenhouse Gases” can be opposed extensively with litigation, to the point that the ruling might not yet be in force when Obama demits office.
• In the second place, the EPA is funded by Congress. So, if the Agency is being used to bypass or neuter Congress, why should legislators not play hardball and retaliate by cutting off its funding?
• The EPA may look formidable, but its situation is rather as if Rommel were buying the fuel for his tanks from the Allies.
• But what is of compelling interest on this side of the pond is the way in which the bullets to shoot down American democracy were made in Britain.

  • Lends credibility to the "conspiracy theorists" who contend from time to time that the USA is still a colony of Great Britain.
  Add Sticky Note
• The trail is not hard to follow. When the EPA published its “Endangerment Finding” on greenhouse gases and proposed rule, back in April, almost every paragraph of the text (Federal Register, April 24, 2009, pp 18886-18910) cited as authority the IPCC’s 2007 Report, which the Agency acknowledges it “relies on most heavily”.
• And whence came the main input on climate change to that report?
• Yes, that’s right! You’ve got it: from Phil Jones, Michael Mann and the rest of the lads at the CRU, East Anglia.
• From the innovative, creative “scientists” who wanted to “beat the crap” out of a climate change sceptic; who “just completed Mike’s Nature trick”; who “can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t”; who deleted e-mails in the interests of science; who tried to prevent publication of dissenters’ views; who coined the historic phrase “hide the decline”.
• Those jokers are the main authority for the extravagant claims in the IPCC report and, by extension, for the EPA’s “Endangerment Finding”.
• That is the authority that is being invoked to overturn the principles of 1776 in the United States.
• The Protocols of the Elders of Norwich are the justification for EPA tyranny.
• It is with that weighty evidence at his back that Barack Obama is going to Copenhagen to sell out American taxpayers to Third World subsidy junkies, profiteering “green” corporations and the ever entrepreneurial Al Gore.
• This is the steal of the millennium: forget the Great Train Robbery and the Brinks Mat caper – these hoodlums are targeting $45 trillion.
• Obama hates America and, increasingly, that sentiment is being reciprocated.
• This is a socialist, World Government putsch.
• Have the American people the resolution to resist it? We shall soon know.
• COMMENTS

• As a Brit, I am unbelievably jealous of the American Constitution. It is a work of art, giving true democracy and power to the people. Those who drafted it knew all too well how governments sour, and how totalitarianism devours. I just hope the American people will stand firm to defend it, while there is time left.

   

  In the meantime, here is a petition for those Brits who are fighting back:
   http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/climate-fraud/index.html
• Obama has lost the plot. He has nailed his true colours to the mast of a fast sinking ship. His next illogical step? Pronounce water (vapour) as an Endangerment to Human Health. Its a greenhouse gas after all. The guy is a fruitcake. America, Wake up.
• Couldn’t agree more. Obama has set the USA back a 100 years and not for the good of the people.
• US & UK manufacturing has been killed by the severe curtailment of CO2 in such a short term. Now they are targetting the agricultural industry and consumers who eat meat or dairy produce.
• The Democrats are falling apart.
• Obama is a socialist, the loons at the UN and Nobel Foundation are his ally.
• Well said. The fear mongering is never ending from one crisis to the next. If you look through history every dictator uses national emergencies to justify their tyranny. Take back your country and the rest of the world will follow!
• Last night Prescott, the former ship’s steward who would struggle to spell science, told Congressman Jim Sensenbrenner, on Newsnight, the US had “a moral responsibility to help the world”. The congressman was rightly less than impressed being told that by a member of a party to whom morals are entirely foreign.
• How long before the EUSSR makes “global-warming denial” a criminal offence?

• am soo going to steal your bon mot, Mr Warner:

   

  “The Protocols of the Elders of Norwich”

   

  Yep, its true – water vapour is bad for our health, so is CO2. Sad, isn’t it, that we’re breathing it out before we can breathe in again.
   Makes you wonder how oxygen-breathing life on earth actually evolved and kept going, us included.

• Meanwhile, see this:
   “Climate change advisers have decided that an extensive building programme at Heathrow — including the construction of a third runway — can proceed without jeopardising the Government’s carbon emissions targets.

   

  The Committee on Climate Change will report today that 138 million extra passenger could use British airports in 2050, an increase of 60 per cent, without breaching government targets to reduce aviation emissions to below 2005 levels.”

• So are we now going to be told to stop breathing, so that the ecowarriors can use that runway to jaunt off across the globe to their meetings?

   

  I’m running out of cynical here …
• Thank you for a clear-sighted article Mr Warner. We need more such articles and a lot less of the Jehovah’s Warmists’ imminent catastrophe propaganda.
• Certain politicians, like Obama and Gordon Brown, have been counting on this AGW scare to position themselves as ’saviours of the world’ and to keep other more real problems, like the worst financial crisis in living memory, which they cannot solve, away from the public eye.
• A great many people have fallen for it. Did you see the shameless propaganda film to open the events at Copenhagen?
• It’s hard to believe, but a great many people were taken in by it – ‘moved to tears’ so they said.

• One more step down the plughole of socialism.

   

  Hello, USSA

   

  Goodbye, America

• “The common enemy of humanity is man.
   In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up
   with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming,
   water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these
   dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through
   changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome.
   The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”
   - Club of Rome,
   premier environmental think-tank,
   consultants to the United Nations

   

  http://green-agenda.com/

• Fear not despite the MSM America has millions of people who know how to protect their freedom.. I fear we head towards civil war with two sides that have a very different take on reality.. The split or acts of violence could come at any time..

   

  Even today the MSM is still pushing the line that we should ignore the last decade of cooling and the climategate scandal and simply believe..

• AS I PREVIOUSLY WARNED YOU LOT…… BREATHING IS NOW DANGEROUS TO PUBLIC HEALTH!

   

  Well, I’m Mad as Hell and I’m NOT going to take it ANYMORE…..’

   

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTN3s2iVKKI&feature=player_embedded

   

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dib2-HBsF08

   

  And Jesus Wept!……

• The Pedestrian by Ray Bradbury

   

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6HAA_tVdwM
• Ruling by decree, taxation without representation…some people have forgotten what happened the last time certain parties tried that.
• Obozo is Richard Nixon with his brains knocked out. This con man is subverting the Constitution and he and his cabal desrve to be in prison.
• Don’t worry Obama plans to stay in office permanently of course this will not be a problem to the left in any way shape or form. “Viva la Revolucion”. Long live the resistance.

• Dreadful, CO2 is now officially outlawed…

   

  What’s next?….OXYGEN?
• “Look, it’s blackmail. It is a way of saying to Congress: Either you do cap-and-trade or we will do cap, no trade. We will regulate every aspect of American life if the EPA now has in its power — and perhaps it will enact it over time — to intrude on every aspect of American life.
• Essentially what it can do is to regulate emissions from any institution, any enterprise, any apartment block that emits more than 250 tons of CO2 in a year, which is a very low level.
• It [EPA] says it will raise that higher but it doesn’t actually have the authority to actually raise it. …
• It really is what Vaclav Klaus, the president of the Czech Republic, said: Environmentalism is the new socialism.
• It is a way for the feds — for the best and brightest in the federal government — to regulate all aspects of life. It used to be in the name of socialism, which was social equality. Now it’s in the name of the planet.

• It is a smart strategy on the part of the left, but it is a hell of a way to do it. If you want to do it, at least you do it by the consensus of Congress. If you do it by regulation, there will be a revolution on the administration’s hands.”

   

  Charles Krauthammer
• It took Nixon until his second term to make so many mistakes! So the USA has a president who is as spineless/moronic as Jimmah Carter and as crooked as Tricky Dick Nixon. Wow…

• Gerald Warner is right on target.

   

  The evidence suggests that Obama has narcissistic personality disorder developed during his formative years in the Jeremiah Wright School of Victimhood.
• Oh to heck with the Greenies lets just save the planet by tying plastic bags to their heads.
• Sadly our Constitution was trashed shortly after 911. We have no control over our Congress or president. We,like the UK, are learning to live in a police state. The only difference is we are still armed.
• My growing distrust of climate scientists is bad enough, but the thing that worries me the most is the proposed solution to environmental issues, which is to destroy national sovereignty and further enslave us all. It is a violation of inalienable rights to initiate force against anyone. To my mind, the only proper solution is private ownership of all property and environmental limits adopted by voluntarily accepted deed restrictions.
• Below is the link explaining what happened to The Virginia Company, one of the preliminary hooks that England placed in America.
• By creating a corporation called “United States” as opposed to “united States” or “the several States” as referenced in the Articles of Confederation, the crown maintained control over policy in it’s new acquisition.
• This is a link to a list of definitions in U.S. Code. It is uniform, so if it is used in this section, it can be used in any section of any law in U.S. Code. Scroll on down to item 15 and take a look.
   THOMAS House Of Representatives Site
• What is going on? You are the Mainstream, you are supposed to tell us everything is for our own good, whilst plans are implemented behind closed doors.Do not tell me you have woken up to the fact that you are not part of the elite, have you?

67 more annotations...

• Copenhagen climate summit in disarray after 'Danish text' leak
• Developing countries react furiously to leaked draft agreement that would hand more power to rich nations, sideline the UN's negotiating role and abandon the Kyoto protocol
• • John Vidal in Copenhagen 
          
  •   guardian.co.uk,   Tuesday 8 December 2009
• The UN Copenhagen climate talks are in disarray today after developing countries reacted furiously to leaked documents that show world leaders will next week be asked to sign an agreement that hands more power to rich countries and sidelines the UN's role in all future climate change negotiations.
• The document is also being interpreted by developing countries as setting unequal limits on per capita carbon emissions for developed and developing countries in 2050;
• meaning that people in rich countries would be permitted to emit nearly twice as much under the proposals.
• The so-called Danish text, a secret draft agreement worked on by a group of individuals known as "the circle of commitment" –

  • The "Coven" of Committment?
  Add Sticky Note
• but understood to include the UK, US and Denmark – has only been shown to a handful of countries since it was finalised this week.
• The agreement, leaked to the Guardian, is a departure from the Kyoto protocol's principle that rich nations, which have emitted the bulk of the CO2, should take on firm and binding commitments to reduce greenhouse gases, while poorer nations were not compelled to act.
• The draft hands effective control of climate change finance to the World Bank; would abandon the Kyoto protocol – the only legally binding treaty that the world has on emissions reductions;
• and would make any money to help poor countries adapt to climate change dependent on them taking a range of actions.
• The document was described last night by one senior diplomat as "a very dangerous document for developing countries.
• It is a fundamental reworking of the UN balance of obligations. It is to be superimposed without discussion on the talks".
• A confidential analysis of the text by developing countries also seen by the Guardian shows deep unease over details of the text.
• In particular, it is understood to:
• Force developing countries to agree to specific emission cuts and measures that were not part of the original UN agreement;
• Divide poor countries further by creating a new category of developing countries called "the most vulnerable";
• Weaken the UN's role in handling climate finance;
• Not allow poor countries to emit more than 1.44 tonnes of carbon per person by 2050, while allowing rich countries to emit 2.67 tonnes.
• Developing countries that have seen the text are understood to be furious that it is being promoted by rich countries without their knowledge and without discussion in the negotiations.
• Clearly the intention is to get [Barack] Obama and the leaders of other rich countries to muscle it through when they arrive next week.
• "It is being done in secret.

  • Secrecy is the order of the day whenever these Devil Pin Heads get together in their smoke filled back rooms to discuss anything..be it international, national or domestic policies. These self styled "Elites" have sumperimposed themselves onto the world populations in poor and rich countries without anyone's consent..other than consent through deceit and abject hypocrisy.
  Add Sticky Note
• It effectively is the end of the UN process," said one diplomat, who asked to remain nameless.
• Antonio Hill, climate policy adviser for Oxfam International, said: "This is only a draft but it highlights the risk that when the big countries come together, the small ones get hurting.
• On every count the emission cuts need to be scaled up. It allows too many loopholes and does not suggest anything like the 40% cuts that science is saying is needed."
• Hill continued: "It proposes a green fund to be run by a board but the big risk is that it will run by the World Bank and the Global Environment Facility [a partnership of 10 agencies including the World Bank and the UN Environment Programme] and not the UN.
• That would be a step backwards, and it tries to put constraints on developing countries when none were negotiated in earlier UN climate talks."
• The text was intended by Denmark and rich countries to be a working framework, which would be adapted by countries over the next week.
• It is particularly inflammatory because it sidelines the UN negotiating process and suggests that rich countries are desperate for world leaders to have a text to work from when they arrive next week.
• Few numbers or figures are included in the text because these would be filled in later by world leaders.

28 more annotations...

• Famous weather scientist: Climategate 'tip of iceberg'
• 'Conspiracy would become manifest' if all climate research e-mails unveiled
• Posted: December 08, 2009
  9:46 pm Eastern
  
   

  By Bob Unruh
   <!--- copywrite only show on NON commentary pages as per joseph meeting 8/23/06 ------>   <!-- copyright --> © 2009 WorldNetDaily 
• The Colorado scientist described by the Washington Post as "the World's Most Famous Hurricane Expert" says the "ClimateGate" e-mails from the United Kingdom that revealed possible data manipulation are evidence of a conspiracy among "warmists," those who believe man's actions are triggering possibly catastrophic climate change.
• "The recent 'ClimateGate' revelations coming out of the UK University of East Anglia are but the tip of a giant iceberg of a well organized international climate warming conspiracy that has been gathering momentum for the last 25 years," said Colorado State University's Dr. William Gray.
• His are the annual hurricane forecasts that are the standard for weather prognostications.
• His work pioneered the science of forecasting hurricanes and he has served as weather forecaster for the United States Air Force. He is Emeritus Professor of Atmospheric Science at CSU and heads the school's Department of Atmospheric Sciences Tropical Meteorology Project.
• He was referring to e-mails and other information that had been obtained by a hacker and posted on a Russian web server that included e-mails among scientists who are part of the cadre of researchers who believe man-made global warming is an impending catastrophe for the world.
• One e-mail said: "I've just completed Mike's Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd (sic) from 1961 for Keith's to hide the decline."
• Another expressed internal doubts: "The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't. The CERES data published in the August (Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society) 09 supplement on 2008 shows there should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong. Our observing system is inadequate."
• Further, an e-mail exchange suggested the suppression of information: "Can you delete any e-mails you may have had with Keith re (Assessment Report 4)? Keith will do likewise. He's not in at the moment – minor family crisis."
• Gray said, "This conspiracy would become much more manifest if all the e-mails of the publically funded climate research groups of the U.S. and of foreign governments were ever made public."
• His comments are in a commentary at the online Climate Depot.com and were posted just as officials from around the globe are conferencing in Copenhagen on the issue of "global warming" and what taxes should be imposed on those who use energy.
• "The Cap-and-Trade bill presently before Congress, the likely climate agreements coming out of the Copenhagen Conference, and the EPA's just announced decision to treat CO2 as a pollutant represents a grave threat to the industrial world's continued economic development," Gray warned.
• "We should not allow these proposals to restrict our economic growth. Any United Nations climate bill our country might sign would act as an infringement on our country's sovereignty."
• He said he probably would have been "concerned" over the possibility people are causing serious global climate degradation "had I not devoted my entire career of over half-a-century to the study and foreasting of meteorological and climate events."
• "There has been an unrelenting quarter century of one-sided indoctrination of the western world by the media and by various scientists and governments concerning a coming carbon dioxide … induced global warming disaster," he said.
• "These warming scenarios have been orchestrated by a combination of environmentalists, vested interest scientists wanting larger federal grants and publicity, the media which profits from doomsday scenario reporting, governmental bureaucrats who want more power over our lives, and socialists who want to level-out global living standards.
• "These many alarmist groups appear to have little concern over whether their global warming prognostications are accurate, however. And they most certainly are not.
• The alarmists believe they will be able to scare enough of our citizens into believing their propaganda that the public will be willing to follow their advice on future energy usage and agree to a lowering of their standard of living in the name of climate salvation."
• He said there still remains to be an "honest and broad" scientific debate on the influence of CO2 on global temperature, and such models as have been used are flawed.
• He cited a global warming of about 1 degree Fahrenheit over the last century, and that's "not a consequence of human activities."
• "The disastrous economic consequences of restricting CO2 emissions from the present by as much as 20 percent by 2020 and 80 percent by 2050 (as being proposed in Copenhagen) have yet to be digested by the general public. Such CO2 output decreases would cause very large increases in our energy costs, a lowering of our standard of living, and do nothing of significance to improve our climate," he said.
• Gray launched the practice of seasonal hurricane forecasts – forecasting months in advance what might be included in a coming hurricane season. After the 2005 Atlantic season, he said he was stepping down from the primary authorship of the CSU report, turning over those duties to Philip J. Klotzbach.
• He's long described global warming as a hoax, telling the Post three years ago, "I am of the opinion that this is one of the greatest hoaxes ever perpetrated on the American people."
• Myron Ebell, of the GlobalWarming.org website where "cooler heads prevail," said the e-mails obtained from the University of East Anglia were "shocking."
• "It's kind of interesting to learn that petty politics seems to be more prevalent in the scientific community than in the political community," he said.
• The documents, he said, "raise a huge number of questions about the integrity of a lot of people in the alarmist community.
• "What I've seen there is a very strong effort to manage the issue by scientists and not as a scientific issue. It's very improper," he said. "One of the criticisms is that we need scientists to be scientists, and policy can be handled in public debate."
• Phil Jones, head of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit, confirmed the documents appeared authentic. He later said he was stepping down for a time.
• Despite the advocacy of a financially vested former vice president, Al Gore, and others, public opinion about whether mankind is causing an ultimately catastrophic rise in global temperatures is shifting.
• U.S. Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, has urged members of Congress to consider the joint opinion of nearly 32,000 scientists, including more than 9,000 Ph.D.s, who believe humans likely have little or nothing to do with any "global warming."
• The Petition Project, launched some 10 years ago when the first few thousand signatures were gathered, has steadily grown without any special effort or campaign
• But in the last few years, and especially because of the release of Gore's movie "An Inconvenient Truth," the campaign has been reinvigorated.
• "Mr. Gore's movie, asserting a 'consensus' and 'settled science' in agreement about human-caused global warming, conveyed the claims about human-caused global warming to ordinary moviegoers and to public-school children, to whom the film was widely distributed.
• Unfortunately, Mr. Gore's movie contains many very serious incorrect claims which no informed, honest scientist could endorse," project spokesman and founder Art Robinson has told WND.

• Robinson, a research professor of chemistry, cofounded the Linus Pauling Institute of Science and Medicine with Linus Pauling in 1973, and later cofounded the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine.  

  Paul later cited the petition results in  statement to Congress.  
• "Our energy policies must be based upon scientific truth – not fictional movies or self-interested international agendas," Paul said.
• "They should be based upon the accomplishments of technological free enterprise that have provided our modern civilization, including our energy industries. That free enterprise must not be hindered by bogus claims about imaginary disasters."
• The petition states: "There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth."
• Robinson has warned of serious political and economic consequences of assuming "global warming" results from mankind's actions.
• "The campaign to severely ration hydrocarbon energy technology has now been markedly expanded," he said. "In the course of this campaign, many scientifically invalid claims about impending climate emergencies are being made. Simultaneously, proposed political actions to severely reduce hydrocarbon use now threaten the prosperity of Americans and the very existence of hundreds of millions of people in poorer countries," he told WND.

40 more annotations...

• Climate treaty endangers U.S.
• By PATRICIA STEBBINS

               

  December 08, 2009
• Hanging over our free­dom and sovereignty is a document called the“United Nations Climate ChangeTreaty.”

• So what, you may say?

                              

  Here’s what.
• The plan is to have signatories from all countries –Third World, radical leftist nations, and us. Unless we forbid President Obama to sign up America, we’ll be caught in this awful net.
• Here’s what it says: 1. Create a world government with power over every nation signing; 2.Transfer wealth from the West to theThird World; 3. Enforce these measures.
• Now let’s explore what these measures mean to us.
• The first one creates a social­ist world government, some­thing our president appears to advocate.The wording provides the U.N. with power over our country, over our Constitution.

• Yes, this world government will have power over our govern­ment, imposing its will on our energy use, resources and jobs.

  Can you live with that?
• The second will force Ameri­can taxpayers to support and subsidizeThird World nations – unstable countries, with no economies nor the capacity to rule themselves without dicta­tors.
• If you think the economy and unem­ployment are bad now, just wait until this treaty goes into effect – IF we allow our president to sign it!
• In effect, this is redistribution of wealth, reducing the U.S. to Third World status and impov­erishing our citizens.
• The third goal of the treaty is the most ominous.
• Stated in the document is the proviso that once a nation has signed, it may not cancel its membership without the approval of all the other member nations.
• Let that sink in.
• No future president, no elected Congress or Senate can vote to take us out of the agreement. And why would they agree to let us out – we will be the biggest cash cow they’ve ever had!
• Recently, theTimes printed an ominous article, quoting agencies of the U.N. and other governmental entities, includ­ing alarming statistics about the impending doom of the alleged global warming. Coincidentally, all these groups are dedicated to a one-world government control­ling all energy and economies.
• Yet multitudes of prestigious independent scientists are loudly saying global warming is a hoax and effort to control nations
• Their voices go unheard by the media.
• I invite readers to check out the following sites and decide for yourselves: http://online.wsj.com/ article/SB100014240527487 035746045745005802856790 74.html?mod=googlenews_ wsj#printMode http://www.climatescien­ceinternational.
• Something dreadful is hap­pening to our country.
• Our Democrat president and Con­gress are hell bent on imposing socialized medicine on us.They are pushing“cap and trade,” an energy program which will destroy our gas and coal indus­tries and lose an estimated two million more jobs while chasing windmills and solar panels.

• They have given millions for a‘Teddy’ memorial (this inserted by Sen.

  John Kerry) in the defense budget!
• We are forced to watch as 40‘czars’are turning out to be a bunch of radical lunatics with unlimited power and answerable only to Obama.
• Our major automobile produc­ers, banks, insurance companies are being run by the govern­ment while Congress refuses to investigate the corrupt ACORN and SEIU organizations.
• Our president and elected offi­cials are planning to eliminate states’rights and give the federal government sweeping powers over things that are now under the rule of the states.
• This can result in gaining control over schools, energy production, the environment and the wealth of every U.S. citizen.
• It IS happening and we must wake up and demand our legislators remember their oath to defend and protect our Constitution and liberties!
• Can’t happen in America?
• Fed up with“Democrat Dicta­torship” yet? Do you really want to send another one to Washington in January?
• Patricia Stebbins lives in East Sandwich.

29 more annotations...

• Former UNEP-Chieftain and Bilderberger Admitted to “International Consensus” on Population Policy
• Published on 12-07-2009
• By Jurriaan Maessen
• Klaus Töpfer, 1996 Bilderberg attendee and former Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) admitted in 2000 that there is an “international consensus” on worldwide population control.
• During a speech given in Berlin in the beginning of the new millennium, Töpfer stated:
• “Most people and policymakers are unaware that there is an international consensus that grounds population policy in human rights and development, emphasizing building the capacities of women to manage their own lives.”
• Here Töpfer admits not only that there is an international consensus to ground population policy in the concepts of “human rights and development”, but also that most people and policymakers are unaware of this consensus.
•                Klaus Töpfer, 1996 Bilderberg attendee and former Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).
• Töpfer should know. He  visited a Bilderberg meeting back in 1989, organized in La Toja, Spain and the  Bilderberg conference held near Toronto, Canada, from May 30 to June 2 1996.
• Besides being a Bilderberger and former UNEP-chieftain, Klaus Töpfer is also a member of the Club of Rome.
• In 2004 he contributed to the Club’s publication ‘Sustainability Creates New Prosperity: Basis for a New World Order, New Economics and Environmental Protection’.
• In his speech in 2000, Töpfer stresses the point: 

   

   

  “Policymakers rarely contemplate long time periods and connections between disparate sets of issues, especially controversial ones. Nonetheless, at the dawn of the new century the world faces a host of environmental and security risks strongly connected to the growing size of human population and the growing affluence of some, but not all, of that population.”

• Ominously, the Executive Director appeared to manifest a crystal ball:

   

  “Future changes in global population will contribute significantly to the need for such integrated, long-term approaches to environmental problems.”
• On another occasion, the Executive Director of UNEP called for the creation of a new global religion:
• “We have to develop the ecological, holistic wold view which connects us with the rest of Nature- both materially and spiritually.
• Religious traditions emphasize this connection. Our task should be to retrieve these basic symbols and doctrines within each tradition and translate them into clear prescription for public policy and behavior.”
• This statement about the “international consensus” reaffirms that which we already know, namely that the global elite have their noses pointed in the same direction when it comes to the world’s human inhabitants and the “need” to curb their numbers.

15 more annotations...

• Nick Griffin - Climategate and the New World Order (Video)
• 2009 12 05
    <!-- ARTICLE BY OR FROM--> 

  From: youtube.com

• Copenhagen: the AGW druids at Copenhagen know they are on a losing wicket and it shows
• 2009 12 08
    <!-- ARTICLE BY OR FROM--> 

  By Gerald Warner | telegraph.co.uk
• For AGW fanatics this was supposed to be the climactic moment, the Machtergreifung that would initiate global government and penal taxes through which the hard-earned money of Western citizens would become a burnt holocaust to the religion of Global Warming,
• 

  
   
   Wonderful, wonderful Copenhagen – or is it?
• the few remaining heretics would be anathematised and the New World Order would commence.
  
• True, the thousands of parasites – politicians, safely bought scientists, civil servants, myth-compliant journalists and other free loaders have duly converged on the Danish capital.
• But it is not working out like that.
• But, for the Climate Moonies, it has turned into a Barmecide feast.
• Even they know that something is wrong. They are frothing and foaming at the mouth more hysterically than ever – but the world is not listening.
• Scepticism was supposed to have been eliminated by now; instead, it has captured majority opinion.
• Climategate is the elephant in the room, the skeleton at the feast.
• It is untrue to say that Britain is split 50-50 – though that, in itself, would be a defeat for warmists – close study of all the surveys shows that scepticism was running at closer to 60 per cent – before Climategate even broke.
• The script said that man-made global warming was to be regarded as an established fact, that sceptics should not even be given the courtesy of an argument.
• Even six months ago, who ever thought that Energy Secretary Ed Milliband would be conceding, on the opening day of Copenhagen, that convincing people of global warming remains a “huge challenge”?
• Now the warmists are on the back foot, thoroughly on the defensive.
• Yet it goes beyond even that. I would be the last person on earth to minimise the importance of Climategate or to deny credit, in any way, to those scientists and journalists who have so tirelessly exposed it. And, of course, it has had an important effect.
• But there is more than that to the irreducible scepticism of the public.
• Even before dodgy e-mails emerged, the public was realising that this was a scheme, not to save the planet, but to make Al Gore a billionaire.
• Gore was trying to charge $1,200 a time for people to shake hands and be photographed with him at Copenhagen.
• Is that the conduct of a man who urgently believes the planet is about to be scorched to a cinder? Is the United Nations a trusted institution?
• The evidence is all around us. Take last weekend’s global warming demonstration in London. It was attended by 20,000 people. In today’s climate of internet communication to organise protests, is that a credible figure reflecting public concern over a global crisis?
• The Countryside March attracted 407,000 people, the Anti-War in Iraq march 750,000.
• “They have science and momentum on their side,” lied a supposedly neutral, but blatantly biased, BBC commentator.
• In reality, they have neither.
• Copenhagen is the high watermark of the AGW scam: after this it has nowhere to go but down.
• The fall of Malcolm Turnbull in Australia and the voting down there of the kind of laws being demanded at Copenhagen shows that electorates are beginning to have their say.
• Politicians’ rodent whiskers are twitching with fear.
• We (I mean by “we” the sane, the scientifically informed, the defenders of freedom, the opponents of socialism and world government) must fight on to victory.
• We must attack, discredit, harass and, if necessary, disobey climate laws and refuse to pay AGW taxes, until this evil pseudo-religion is thrown into the dustbin of history.
• Even the mere passage of time disproves global warming.
• There is an unexpected defensiveness and lack of confidence detectable behind the blowhard utterances at Copenhagen. There is a change of pulse. They are on a slippery slope. We are going to win this one.

29 more annotations...

• Caviar Scoffing, CO2 Belching, Prostitute Molesting Climate Crooks Convene For The Mass Raping
• 2009 12 07
    <!-- ARTICLE BY OR FROM--> 

  By Paul Joseph Watson | PrisonPlanet.com
• 

  
   While preparing to sternly lecture the general public about carbon emissions, globalists descend on Copenhagen in record numbers of private jets and stretch limos.
• Record numbers of stretch limos and private jets are descending on Copenhagen as thousands of CO2 belching, caviar scoffing, prostitute molesting, hypocritical climate crooks prepare to orchestrate the next round of mass raping in pursuit of their much cherished world government and its handmaiden, a global tax on carbon emissions.
• In another stark reminder that these globalists couldn’t give a damn about CO2 emissions, only eviscerating economies and the middle class, their own behavior is completely at odds with how they are indignantly demanding other people live their lives.
• A London Telegraph report reveals how the combined CO2 footprint of the conference will amount to no less than 41,000 tons, equal to that produced by an African country over the same period.
• Despite the fact that the climate crooks constantly berate and browbeat Joe Public about not driving hybrid vehicles and taking two holidays a year via commercial airliners, the Copenhagen criminals are arriving in luxurious private jets before whizzing around town in gas-guzzling stretch limos.
• “We thought they were not going to have many cars, due to it being a climate convention,” Majken Friss Jorgensen, managing director of Copenhagen’s biggest limousine company told the Telegraph. “But it seems that somebody last week looked at the weather report.”
• “Ms Jorgensen reckons that between her and her rivals the total number of limos in Copenhagen next week has already broken the 1,200 barrier.
• The French alone rang up on Thursday and ordered another 42.
• “We haven’t got enough limos in the country to fulfil the demand,” she says. “We’re having to drive them in hundreds of miles from Germany and Sweden.”
• “And the total number of electric cars or hybrids among that number?
   
   “Five,” says Ms Jorgensen.”
• While readying speeches about how the middle class will be forced to lower their living standards, pay higher taxes on all forms of travel, and make personal sacrifices in order to save the planet from the alleged menace of CO2, Copenhagen globalists will be relaxing on the 140 extra private jets that are being forced to drop off attendees in Copenhagen and then fly back to other airports and even other countries just to park due to the lack of spaces.
• Elitists will scoff scallops, foie gras and sculpted caviar wedges, while lecturing the general public about how eating meat is harming the earth.
• And while the climate crooks wag their finger at you for having the audacity to own an SUV, they will be running up a bill of over $200 million dollars, and guess who is going to be picking up the tab?
• <“According to an analysis by the Taxpayer’s Alliance, a conservative cost of Copenhagen is £130million.
   It includes £6.3million on flights, £20million on hotels and £3.3million on food,” reports the Daily Mail.
• “The figure also includes the salaries for delegates and the contribution from the Danish government of £37 million. Most of the money will come from taxpayers.”
• Meanwhile, eco-fascism has proven it’s still very much alive and well with the news that “56 major newspapers in 45 countries are today publishing a shared editorial calling on politicians and negotiators gathering in Copenhagen to strike an ambitious deal on combating climate change.”
• Of course, behind the contrived grandstanding on behalf of such publications that they are somehow speaking with one united voice in the interests of humankind, all this really shows is that the same establishment attempting to bang the last few nails in the coffin of freedom, by taxing carbon dioxide, the life-giving gas that humans exhale and trees absorb, also happen to own and control the vast majority of the global media.
• Far from being an upstanding act of benign advocacy, as it is being framed, the fact that 56 major world newspapers are all spewing the same propaganda, especially in light of the Climategate scandal that most of them have failed to even acknowledge in any depth whatsoever, smacks of the kind of editorial control the Nazis exercised in 1930’s Germany or Joseph Stalin enjoyed in Communist Russia.
• Meanwhile, according to an article in Spiegel Online, prostitutes are preparing for globalists to descend on Copenhagen by offering free sex.
• The Mayor of Copenhagen attempted to limit the expected deluge of summit attendees enjoying the use of prostitutes by sending a letter to hotels across the city urging delegates and guests at the conference, “Be sustainable, don’t buy sex.”
• Prostitutes responded by offering free sex to any Copenhagen attendee who produces the Mayor’s letter.
• Summits of this size are routinely accompanied by a huge spike in the sex trade in whatever city they happen to be taking place.
• While servants of the global elite and their masters lecture us about our moral imperatives, half of them are out committing adultery on a nightly basis during the same global conferences at which they habitually pose with righteous indignation.
• Make sure you have plenty of vomit bags on standby over the next couple of weeks, because you are going to be endlessly lectured by a gaggle of amoral, money-grubbing, control freak thugs who couldn’t care less about the environment unless they can invoke it as a pretext for taxing you out of existence while declaring the very particles that you breathe to be a deadly poison.

24 more annotations...

• Bayer Admits GMO Contamination is Out of Control
• Greenpeace International, Dec 8, 2009
            Straight to the Source
• EXTRACT: Bayer has admitted it has been unable to control the spread of its genetically-engineered organisms despite 'the best practices [to stop contamination]'(1). It shows that all outdoors field trials or commercial growing of GE crops must be stopped before our crops are irreversibly contaminated.
• Bayer has admitted it has been unable to control the spread of its genetically-engineered organisms despite 'the best practices [to stop contamination]'(1). It shows that all outdoors field trials or commercial growing of GE crops must be stopped before our crops are irreversibly contaminated.
• $2 million US dollar verdict against Bayer confirms company's liability for an uncontrollable technology
• Greenpeace welcomes the United States federal jury ruling on 4 December 2009 that Bayer CropScience LP must pay $2 million US dollars to two Missouri farmers after their rice crop was contaminated with an experimental variety of rice that the company was testing in 2006
• This verdict confirms that the responsibility for the consequences of GE (genetic engineering) contamination rests with the company that releases GE crops.

5 more annotations...