show how the values Faulkner mentions in his speech are reflected in his short story. If you don't think they are, you may choose to argue that position.
Children younger than 10 or 11 years think about moral dilemmas one way; older children consider them differently.
two-stage theory
younger children base their moral judgments more on consequences, whereas older children base their judgments on intentions
10 or 11 years--children's moral thinking undergoes other shifts
found a series of changes that occur between the ages of 10 and 12
Kohlberg therefore interviewed both children and adolescents about moral dilemmas, and he did find stages that go well beyond Piaget's.
basic interview consists of a series of dilemmas
not really interested in whether the subject says "yes" or "no" to this dilemma but in the reasoning behind the answer
interrater reliability
The child assumes that powerful authorities hand down a fixed set of rules which he or she must unquestioningly obey.
morality as something external to themselves, as that which the big people say they must do.
preconventiona
children recognize that there is not just one right view that is handed down by the authorities
What is right for Heinz, then, is what meets his own self-interests.
stage 1 punishment is tied up in the child's mind with wrongness; punishment "proves" that disobedience is wrong. At stage 2, in contrast, punishment is simply a risk that one naturally wants to avoid.
Interesting dichotomy here...
isolated individuals rather than as members of society
people should live up to the expectations of the family and community and behave in "good" ways
issue in terms of the actors' character traits and motives
conventional "morality
In both sequences there is a shift from unquestioning obedience to a relativistic outlook and to a concern for good motives.
respondent becomes more broadly concerned with societyas a whole. Now the emphasis is on obeying laws, respecting authority, and performing one's duties so that the social order is maintained.
[Society needs] a centralizing framework.
Kohlberg insists that we must probe into the reasoning behind the overt response
"What makes for a good society
"prior-to-society
society is best conceived as a social contract into which people freely enter to work toward the benefit of all
rights, such as liberty and life, to be protected Second
democratic procedures for changing unfair law and for improving society
"morality" and "rights" that take some priority over particular laws
this right is legitimized by the authority of their social or religious group
property has little meaning without life
interesting idea...
defines the principles by which we achieve justice.
huh?
justice require us to treat the claims of all parties in an impartial manner, respecting the basic dignity, of all people as individuals. The principles of justice are therefore universal; they apply to all.
all parties--the druggist, Heinz, and his wife--take the roles of the others.
interview dilemmas are not useful for distinguishing between stage 5 and stage 6 thinking
Stage 5 would be more hesitant to endorse civil disobedience because of its commitment to the social contract and to changing laws through democratic agreements.
At stage 6, in contrast, a commitment to justice makes the rationale for civil disobedience stronger and broade
Summary
stages are not the product of maturation
Neither, Kohlberg maintains, are his stages the product of socialization
The stages emerge, instead, from our own thinking about moral problem
scarlet devils and the silver curve of fish - this, the cheese which he knew he smelled and the hermetic meat which his intestines believed he smelled coming in intermittent gusts momentary an
lettering which meant nothing
illiterate?
Later, twenty years later, he was to tell himself, "If I had said they wanted only truth, justice, he would have hit me again.