"The self-satisfied declamations against Mr. Romney’s comments by Democrats and their supporters depend on near complete ignorance of Mr. Obama’s actual policies while in office"
who noticed that none in his audience challenged them?
Barack Obama’s ‘deficit’ commission believes that Mr. Obama’s big-money supporters are of different mindsets than
Mr. Romney’s?
very same people in Mr. Romney’s audience
who Barack Obama had dedicated his first term in office to serving.
belief system that sustains the true ‘dependent’ class of bankers,
corporate executives and their servants in government finds unfettered
government caused the housing crisis by forcing
voice.
bankers to make home loans to poor people
caused the Great Recession by incurring too much debt
Excessive regulation caused the financial meltdown of 2008
unemployed are so because
unemployment benefits provide them with comfortable lives
The self-satisfied declamations against Mr. Romney’s comments by Democrats and their supporters depend on near complete ignorance of Mr. Obama’s actual policies while in office
Who among them stand to benefit from Mr. Obama’s top-secret Trans-Pacific Partnership free-trade agreement that seals the power of international capital over labor and environmental regulations
Mr. Obama’s build-out of the domestic infrastructure of surveillance, policing and the legal framework needed to crush rebellion?
But between Mitt Romney and Barack Obama, who was it that unconditionally revived their fortunes with bank bailouts while leaving twenty-five million people under / unemployed and forty-six million so poor they qualify for
food stamps?
Mitt Romney’s public persona is exactly as he is—a deeply clueless aristocrat born to wealth and power who’s political interests lie exclusively with those of his class (and race).
are based on his experience of the world
which can better sell th
the ruling class:
clueless aristocrat
skilled technocrat who can speak the
language of ‘the people’ while serving these same interests?
a Romney Presidency would sink
the fortunes of the ruling class for at least a generation
And while it is unwise to frame reality by one’s political opposition, some in the ruling class are obviously taking the threat of effective rebellion seriously
his liberal and progressive minions seem to
orget his actual policies.
political ‘gotcha’ against Mr. Romney rather than the education in class struggle that it is.
Democrats and their supporters seem to want to continue their role of recent decades as constructive functionaries in a system designed to facilitate and perpetuate the fortunes of an economic elite, a ruling class
which has found ever more effective ways of siphoning off the wealth
created by working people and nature while increasing their domination
and control over our lives
oppressive prison system in the world
greatest concentration of
largest and most
largest and most
deadly military in human history, used to promote the fortunes of the ruling class, and environmental catastrophe.
And income distribution is an outcome of political ‘negotiation,’ not a fact of nature
, is that the income it
receives is all of the evidence of its social product needed.
who won the political negotiation, not who produced the
social value
made the rich
richer (link) and left liberals and progressives to plea with the rich to
give a bit of it back out of ‘kindness.
increasing surveillance, militarization of the police and removal of legal
restraints, the ruling class is moving ahead with its plans for the next
round of ‘negotiations.’
His lack of political skill is very much a function of his class
privilege—he conspicuously has never had to explain himself, witness
his actual policies
his refusal to release his tax returns, or his views.
would look as much like Barack Obama’s as Barack Obama’s do like George W. Bush’s.
scheme to force people to buy health insurance from private insurers
that have no intention of willfully paying claims
unconditional and ongoing bailouts of corrupt bankers have gone over if
Wall Street McMoneybags Romney had engineered them?
the existing political economy and one that at least stands a chance of
working. And neither party is offering that choice.
he says that 47 percent of Americans — including the poor and the elderly — view themselves as "victims" who are incapable of "taking personable responsibility or care for their lives."
David Brooks
Peggy Noonan
William Kristol
Republican pundits would
join the pile-on — and in some
cases, with perhaps more venom
Peggy N
she said an "intervention is needed"
Romney's "incompetent" campaign
nominee is "too small and pinched
and narrow," and some voters are "starting to think Romney's a loser."
she doubled down on her criticisms, saying she had called his campaign incompetent "only because I was being polite. I really meant 'rolling calamity.'"
Michael Gerson
former speechwriter for George W. Bush also isn't happy with Romney.
Gerson said Romney's comments
on the 47 percent reflect an empty ideology that is both "simplistic and
callous.
"appealing to a common Republican belief that the expansion of government has produced a class of citizens who live off the sweat of others,"
joined a battle that less mature conservatives
have wanted "ever since they read Atlas Shrugged as pimply adolescents.
Gerson's Ayn Rand zinger: Paul Ryan has described Atlas
Shrugged as his favorite book and intellectual touchstone.
David Brooks
reliable gauge of center-right opinion in America has long been full of
he embraced several of the most popular features of the Affordable Care Act on Meet the Press
like allow young adults to keep their coverage under their parents’
health insurance and ensuring that those with pre-existing conditions can get coverage.
“of course there are a number of things that I
like in health care reform that I’m going to put in place” set off alarm bells from K Street lobbying firms to mega rich Super PAC donors an
Republican leadership.
right wing pundits were all over Romney
on Obamacare no less
Rush Limbaugh
told listeners that Romney may as well be “Elmer
Fudd”
With the mounting criticism from the Republican establishment Romney no doubt saw the events in the Middle East as an opportunity to do just as Limbaugh had instructed.
At a time when events required him to be a leader Romney was to engaged in fulfilling his ambition to recognize the moment.
wealthy gentry really thinks about the rest of us — and it’s not pretty.
“Frankly, what I need you to do is to raise millions of dollars, because the president’s going to have about $800 to $900 million. And that’s – that’s by far the most important thing you could do.”
He’s being truthful there because money rules these campaigns.
And if there were more secret videos from other candidates, we would see them in equally compromised positions, bowing and scraping in their infernal pursuit of campaign cash, bending over backwards to suffer the advice that the privileged think their money entitles them to give
President Obama joked, “If somebody here has a $10 million check — I can’t solicit it from you, but feel free to use it wisely.”
Obama and Romney alike now shape their schedules as much around moneymaking events as around rallies and town halls.
if there’s money to be made, they’ll change the campaign jet’s flight plan and make a special landing, just for the cold, hard cash.
A new report from Moody’s Investor Service says that all the spending by the parties,
corporations, super PACs and other outside groups will push political ad spending up this year by half a billion dollars
“There’s going to be a lot of money spent. I’m not saying that’s the best thing for
America, but it’s not a bad thing for the CBS Corporation.”
. One Democratic consultant has called
it “the greatest windfall that ever happened for political
operatives in American history.”
the top 150 political and media
consultants already had raked in an estimated $465 million
There’s a groundswell for rooting the money out of
politics as Americans come to see that this is the one reform that
enables all other reforms.
eight in ten – are in favor of clamping down on the amount of money that corporations, the super-rich, and those shadowy outside groups can pour into the campaigns