These matrices are a great way to conceptualize instructional design. Use as a foundation for developing USMLERx learning model.
Great starting point for finding researchers/references and historical context
These matrices are a great way to conceptualize instructional design. Use as a foundation for developing USMLERx learning model.
Long list of links and other resources for instructional design
"Next time you see a learning styles questionnaire, burn it [we] produced two reports for the now defunct Learning and Skills Development Agency, which got cold feet and refused to launch them. It was afraid, as one of the government's "delivery partners", to back research it had itself funded, in case it upset the DfES.
Our reports reviewed, systematically, 13 models of learning styles and concluded that this area of research is theoretically incoherent and conceptually confused. I listed in the reports 30 dichotomies, such as "activists" versus "reflectors", "globalists" versus "analysts", and "left brainers" versus "right brainers". We should stop using these terms. There's no scientific justification for them.
We do students a serious disservice by implying they have only one learning style, rather than a flexible repertoire from which to choose, depending on the context."
"A significant aspect of the CDT framework is learner control, i.e., the idea that learners can select their own instructional strategies in terms of content and presentation components. In this sense, instruction designed according to CDT provides a high degree of individualization since students can adapt learning to meet their own preferences and styles. "
Table of 9 learning events with correlated internal mental processes