Chiefs become invested in war, creating a desire for war. However, their lack of authority allows the tribe to stave off becoming a tool for the chief (thus preventing the desire for war from becoming a will to power). In fact, it condemns the warrior chief to death in advance (210)
On to the more concrete question–what is an anarchist anthropologist to do. Graeber calls for “low theory” (versus a single high theory, which would be inimical to the spirit of anarchism). “Low theory”, rather, is a way to grapple with the immediate questions that emerge from transformative projects. In “Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropologist”, he describes ethnography as a rough, incipient model “of how non-vanguardist revolutionary intellectual practice might work”. There are two aspects or moments to this project: “one ethnographic, one utopian, suspended in constant dialogue” (12)
Anarchic Solidarity, T. Gibson & K. Sillander