27
CBO, the official scorekeepers for legislation, said the House and Senate bills will help in the short term but result in so much government debt that within a few years they would crowd out private investment, actually leading to a lower Gross Domestic Product over the next 10 years than if the government had done nothing.
"And so, if it's the plan that I see today, put me down in the 'no' column," he said.
On "Fox News Sunday," McCain (R-Ariz.), whom Obama trounced in the general election, said he's looking forward to negotiating, but "as it stands now, I would not support" the plan. "We need to make tax cuts permanent, and we need to make a commitment that there'll be no new taxes," McCain said. "We need to cut payroll taxes. We need to cut business taxes."
But questions about how to spend the money and concerns about the last stimulus package under former President Bush, may create a roadblock.
"We begin this year and this administration in the midst of an unprecedented crisis that calls for unprecedented action," he said in his weekly radio and Internet address. "Just this week, we saw more people file for unemployment than at any time in the last 26 years, and experts agree that if nothing is done, the unemployment rate could reach double digits."
Obama pleaded for quick action, warning, "a bad situation could become dramatically worse."
A major cut in the corporate tax favored by Republicans could have been added to Democratic public works spending for a quick political triumph that might have done at least some economic good.
Instead, Mr. Obama chose to let House Democrats write the bill, and they did what comes naturally: They cleaned out their intellectual cupboards and wrote a bill that is 90% social policy, and 10% economic policy. (See here for a case study.) It is designed to support incomes with transfer payments, rather than grow incomes through job creation.