After all, they are in the alienation business. It is entirely in the profession’s best interests that it treat us as if our lives are lived in a vacuum, our loneliness and despair are entirely our own,
Most drug-policy-reform advocates know the name of Judge Francis Young and many can quote a line from his 1988 recommendation that the DEA remove marijuana from Schedule One: "Marijuana is one of the safest therapeutically active substances known to man."
Gary Greenberg’s “Manufacturing Depression” (Simon & Schuster; $27)
“The Emperor’s New Drugs”
. It’s a sane response to a crazy world.
that our unhappiness is a chemical problem, not an existential one
even more critical of cognitive-behavioral therapy,
indoctrination into the pieties of American optimism, an ideology as much as a medical treatment.
about getting people to accept current arrangements.
They just see, in the world’s unhappiness, a chance to make money
only one exception to a diagnosis of depression: bereavement
existential-humanistic talk therapy
then that something becomes a disorder to be treated (social anxiety)
Kirsch’s conclusion is that antidepressants are just fancy placebos
So how can Kirsch claim that the drugs have zero medicinal value?
is answer is that the statistical edge, when it turns up, is a placebo effect.
But antidepressants have side effects, and sugar pills don’t.
This means that a patient who experiences minor side effects can conclude that he is taking the drug,
and start to feel better, and a patient who doesn’t experience side effects can conclude that she’s taking the placebo, and feel worse
the placebo effect—you believe that you are taking a pill that will make you feel better; therefore, you feel better—wipes out the statistical difference.
Kirsch suggests that the result in STAR*D may be one big placebo effect.
. By the sixth switch, a hundred per cent of the subjects reported that they no longer felt nauseous—even though every one of the anti-nausea drugs was a placebo.
Is psychopharmacology evil, or is it useless
, accuse it of turning deviance into a disorder
and of confusing health with conformity.
diagnostic categories psychiatrists use don’t match up with the conditions patients have
All the psychiatrists reached the same diagnosis only twenty per cent of the time,
and two were in agreement less than half the time.
The more psychotherapy, the smaller the recovery rate
which focusses on the way patients reason,
no difference in effectiveness between C.B.T.,
which focusses on their relations with other people
and interpersonal therapy
do no better than patients who meet with sympathetic professors with no psychiatric training
care works for some of the people some of the time,
and it doesn’t much matter what sort of care it is
Patients believe that they are being cared for by someone who will make them feel better; therefore, they feel better
e inability of hospital psychiatrists to distinguish mentally ill patients from impostors.
inserted the category “ego-dystonic homosexuality”—distress because of the presence of homosexual arousal or the absence of heterosexual arousal.
while self-defeating personality disorder was lobbied against by women’s groups, and was deleted.
—neurotic, anal, Oedipal—was wiped out of the discipline
he antidepressant business looks like a demolition derby
a collision of negative research results,
may soon turn into something bigger, something more like a train wreck
skepticism about the state of psychiatry is that it’s not really science.
Cultural, political, and economic factors, not scientific progress, underlie the triumph of diagnostic psychiatry and the current ‘scientific’ classification of mental illness entities,
oal of biological psychiatry is to identify the organic conditions underlying the symptoms
to establish psychiatry firmly on the disease model of medical practice
disorders
Is depression—insomnia, irritability, lack of energy, loss of libido, and so on—like a fever or like a disease?
It was the depression talking, she told him, not her
Kramer thinks that the notion that depression affords us, as Greenberg puts it, “some glimpse of the way things are” is a myth standing in the way of treating a potentially dangerous disease of the brain
The tests, not the fever, identify the disease.
n the case of mood disorders, it is difficult to find a test to distinguish mental illness from normal mood changes