The author Stasy Taylor name was clearly shown and the domain as an (.edu) for educational purposes.
3 Types of Web Collaboration
The author Stasy Taylor name was clearly shown and the domain as an (.edu) for educational purposes.
Asynchrounous Collaboration would be classified as the "everyday" of the three due to emails and text messaging.
Synchronous Tools
Synchronous tools enable real-time communication and collaboration in a "same time-different place" mode. These tools allow people to connect at a single point in time, at the same time. Synchronous tools possess the advantage of being able to engage people instantly and at the same point in time. The primary drawback of synchronous tools is that, by definition, they require same-time participation -different time zones and conflicting schedules can create communication challenges. In addition, they tend to be costly and may require significant bandwidth to be efficient.
FaceTime and Skype would be examples of Synchronous that we may use on a daily. This type of collaboration helps with not having to wait for a reply as opposed Asynchronous
Asynchronous Tools
Asynchronous tools enable communication and collaboration over a period of time through a "different time-different place" mode. These tools allow people to connect together at each person's own convenience and own schedule. Asynchronous tools are useful for sustaining dialogue and collaboration over a period of time and providing people with resources and information that are instantly accessible, day or night. Asynchronous tools possess the advantage of being able to involve people from multiple time zones. In addition, asynchronous tools are helpful in capturing the history of the interactions of a group, allowing for collective knowledge to be more easily shared and distributed. The primary drawback of asynchronous technologies is that they require some discipline to use when used for ongoing communities of practice (e.g., people typically must take the initiative to "login" to participate) and they may feel "impersonal" to those who prefer higher-touch synchronous technologies.
Author Name is visible and all rights are copyrighted to the American Society of Association Executives.
Critical thinking came into mind with this brochure seeing as how I am currently involved in an E-Learning situation myself.
Integrated Collaboration is the future of collaborating. Though it does not really apply to the Digital World that much, it;s still great to research about.
3 Keys to a Successful Online Collaboration
At the bottom of the article they give a cite reference to (Forbes.com)
The .Org extension is for the article bringing awareness to this particular issue.
Content Management is important for an author to keep information updated without having to know the ends and outs of Web Designing.
A content management system (CMS) is a system used to manage the content of a Web site. Typically, a CMS consists of two elements: the content management application (CMA) and the content delivery application (CDA). The CMA element allows the content manager or author, who may not know Hypertext Markup Language (HTML), to manage the creation, modification, and removal of content from a Web site without needing the expertise of a Webmaster. The CDA element uses and compiles that information to update the Web site. The features of a CMS system vary, but most include Web-based publishing, format management, revision control, and indexing, search, and retrieval.
When Internet Collaboration meets Social Media
Contributions to http://www.kstoolkit.org/ are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 3.0 License.
Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 3.0 License
Portions not contributed by visitors are Copyright 2013 Tangient LLC
Companies are now making it easier for their employees to have the social networking experience with the ability to "keep it professional" by being able to collaborate with other employees.
Many enterprise vendors are now adding components such as wikis, blogs, social profiles, tagging and so on as 'features', but...
This approach to software development does not work. The resulting application suites are monolithic, inflexible, not extensible, expensive to scale and are invariably difficult, if not impossible, to integrate with other enterprise technologies. This class of software forces business users to adopt the myopic social visions imagined by the developers, which are nearly identical to their corresponding consumer web implementations. In short, social software is not solving business problems.
Aaron also picks up on the need for flexibility and interoperability with existing applications and the crucial differences between consumer oriented social life networking and business focused collaboration networks:
...information fabric is a federation of content from the multiplicity of data and application silos utilized on a daily basis; such as, ERP, CRM, file servers, email, databases, web-services infrastructures, etc. When you make this information fabric easy to edit between groups of individuals in a dynamic, secure, governed and real-time manner, it creates a Collaborative Network.
This is very different from social networks or social software, which is focused entirely on enabling conversations. Collaborative Networks are focused on groups accessing and organizing data into actionable formats that enable decision making, collaboration and reuse. Collaborative Networks will increasingly be critically important to business and organizations by helping to establish a culture of innovation and by delivering operational excellence.
The point is clear: casual social life organization is very different to working together through deliverables to achieve results. It is this type of organization that justifies budgets...the apparently random chatter around sociable networks is not an attractive proposition in a business scenario on a number of levels.
The author Oliver Marks makes himself definitely known on this article by even offering readers a section at the bottom of the page which gives a brief background of his Tech history.
Cloud Computing is the Future
Greater Collaboration, Lower Costs
Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) Director Lt. Gen. Ronnie Hawkins Jr. was recently interviewed by Defense News, and his comments reflect what is often heard from aerospace and defense companies as well. He says a more enterprise-wide approach to managing information systems is needed to break down functional and service-unique barriers of the past to increase collaboration. He’s also leading the DISA in partnership with the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) to attain a 20% cost reduction in his agency, relying in part on cloud computing to reduce costs. Consolidating down to one e-mail system, virtualizing applications in a hosted environment, and moving capabilities to the cloud are integral to achieving the 20% cost reduction. Ultimately he sees the DISA becoming a cloud service broker.
The "For Dummies" series being as popular as they are already for information on numerous topics is self-explanatory when it comes to credible sources.
Internet Collaboration in the Classroom
With most schools back in session, students in about 600 districts nationwide will return with a new piece of tech: their own personal Apple iPad.
Since the iPad launched last year, some schools have replaced textbooks with E-books. Programs in two thirds of the 600 districts are new for this year; others started these "one-to-one" programs, in which schools provide one iPad for each student, soon after Apple released the tablet in April, 2010.
Author's name was clearly shown at the beginning of the article and it was published by U.S. News website.
The website is current and updates daily which leaves room for new information.
Social media has found a prominent place in the college classroom.
In fact, nearly 80 percent of faculty members are using social media in some way, according to a recent survey of nearly 2,000 college faculty by the Babson Survey Research Group published in April.
While some platforms, such as YouTube, have been widely accepted in the classroom, Twitter has been slower to catch on as a teaching tool. In the same survey, only 2 percent of professors reported using the microblogging site—which limits posts to 140 characters—in class.