We now see more concern for (a) the assessment of portfolios--to better reflect the achievement of students in their classroorns; (b) performance tests--a venerable form of assessment brought back into the limelight because we have learned that classical forms of testing can not easily be made to tap complex aspects of human cognition; (c) informal classroom assessment by teachers--because informal assessment, conducted on the run by sensitive teachers trying to make sense out of a large group of very heterogeneous students, is how the vast majority of classroom assessments are carried out, and it is these data that are used in teachers' decisions about instruction or the need for special services for particular students; and (d) program evaluation--which now is seen as a political process, to be conducted by a whole range of social scientists and humanistic scholars, to educate decision makers for making responsible choices in a democratic nation (see Cronbach, 1980, for a synthesis of these views, as well as the writings of other distinguished evaluators such as House, Stake, or Weiss in McLaughlin & Phillips, 1991). These contemporary views of evaluation are far more Deweyan and much less Thorndikian than was true when educational psychologists began to work in program evaluation.
- mit3y mouse on 2007-11-18