Titanic china has been exhibited in museums. Video footage of the site was part of James Cameron's blockbuster film Titanic. Even pieces of coal from the ship have turned up for sale as commemorative keepsakes
The team took pictures to document the ship's condition and investigate its sinking, but recovered no artifacts. In fact, the team left a commemorative plaque requesting that the site be left undisturbed as a memorial to the dead.
a controversial salvage operation set up as a limited partnership retrieved china, jewelry, and other artifacts from the luxury liner and exhibited them in Paris. The venture was subsequently sold to a company called RMS Titanic Inc.
sole authority over the salvage and ownership of any items recovered from the Titanic based on a legal precept called salvor-in-possession rights.
discouraging for Ballard, who views the site as a memorial to those who lost their lives in the disaster
Good quote connecting Titanic to USS Arizona
Can you imagine them doing this kind of thing on the U.S.S. Arizona in Pearl Harbor
that retrieving artifacts from the site is inappropriate because of the wreck's significance as a memorial gravesite, especially to families of the deceased. "We know of three Titanic survivors who have died and had their ashes scattered on the site," he said
not allowed to sell artifacts from the ship other than the pieces of coal, which were sold to help cover expedition expenses
ship is rapidly deteriorating on the ocean floor
the process could take several hundred years
, to be evidence not of a catastrophic structural failure about to occur in the near future, but rather of a gradual collapse that would follow a somewhat predictable pattern
"We want to document, record, and share this special wreck with the world and not just the few fortunate and privileged enough to get down there," he said.
My vision of the future," he added, "is that Titanic will be much like the Arizona or Gettysburg [Civil War battlefield], where people can visit and pay their respects
But when human beings find and covet a wreck—for its historical value, its diving possibilities, its gold—then the question suddenly becomes rabidly contentious.
the State of Texas, which excavated the ship and has preserved and studied its artifacts, and the government of France, which claims ownership of its famed explorer's lost vessel.
Such battles rage on, some working their way right up to the U.S. Supreme Court and many remaining unresolved to this day
who owns lost ships
"law of finds
(An arrest is a claim of ownership that precludes other claims until it is resolved in court
the insurance companies that had become the liner's owner after paying insurance claims had made no attempt to salvage the wreck
The law of finds pertains to abandoned shipwrecks, but for unabandoned wrecks—those whose owners still claim ownership—the "law of salvage" has generally applied.
legal battle with the company that salvaged 6,000 pieces of Titanic artifacts worth 110 million dollars
expected to rule that all the artifacts must remain together in a collection and cannot be sold anywhere but to a Museum. Should the Titanic artifacts be protected or put up for auction to the highest bidder?
sold to the smithsonian natural history museum
should be put in a museum
you can't sell history
should be put in a museum & not be sold that's history
The resting place of the Titanic is sacred ground where many rest. The artifacts and the ship itself should be left alone now.
What artifacts were brought to the surface need to be protected. They should not be sold to anyone because, honestly....who has the right to sell any of it?!?!
titanic artifacts need to be protected and copes of them need to be put in muesuems so that the people can see what they were like but the originals need to be kept by archeologists to do studys
without being scattered around the world like the other artifacts
It's history that should never be forgotten, who knows what will happen to them if they're privately owned