這與 storycorps 有什麼不同?A public dialogue about belief - one essay at a time.
Greenville Daily Photo-living downtown 是很好的生活紀錄觀察。因為日常的細微感觸而對生活空間遠景產生好奇...可能是一般民眾開始關注公共事務(包括文件)的觸媒...
I’m not sure if the construction is for new housing or a complete rework of the park. Possibly a local reader can provide some insight.
PS: Some Google research has turned up the answer. At the GreeterGreenville website under the haynie-sirrine master plan section I found a document which includes a recommendation to create an important public space to honor the memory of Miss Ellie Mae Logan.
訪問 BrooWaha - La 地域報(http://losangeles.broowaha.com/index.php)辦報人。對於初始構想,心有戚戚焉。
這段很適合說明水規費的必要,esp. 礁溪溫泉.
quote| this "failure" was also a success in making art a charged public event. |這句話真真切, 有體無魂的公共藝術實在沒什麼意思.
public 的定義與反射|Public art at its best helps us to see the rest of the space differently. | 簡單明瞭
One of the problems is that public art is such an amorphous category. There is certainly no single solution to the question of what makes a successful piece. But a commission is more likely to succeed if its purpose and function are questioned at the start.
Is the work to be a sculpture or an installation? Is it for an existing community with an existing identity, or a new community whose identity can be influenced by the commission? Is it to be permanent or temporary? If temporary, what follows? Is the commission primarily a sop to a developers' conscience, a blatant attempt to gloss over a basically mediocre development? How is the community to be involved? How is the artist involved? What is the process for choosing a short list of artists for the commission - if this is the route chosen? And finally, who chooses the actual commission?
雖然整篇文字與引用文字產生了很不幸福的矛盾XD
- pisecs aries on 2008-03-15