Skip to main contentdfsdf

Dan Budin's List: Ethnology Project

    • he Kurds are a linguistic and ethnic group, nearly exclusively Moslem by religion, totalling some three million people.  6    
    • They occupy a semi-continuous territory along the hills and mountains east and north of the Fertile Crescent, divided between the modern states of Persia, iraq, Turkey, the U.S.S.R., and Syria.

    1 more annotation...

    • Kurdish, an Indo-European language, is most closely related to Persian. It consists of four main dialects (northern, middle, and southern Kurmanji, and Gorani), which in turn include several local dialects.
    • The Republic of Haiti is the second-oldest independent nation in the Western Hemisphere, and it is the only one with a French-Creole background and an overwhelmingly African culture. Large communities of Haitians exist outside Haiti, especially in the Dominican Republic, on other Caribbean islands, in Central America and northern South America, and in North America.
    • The language spoken by all Haitians is usually referred to as Haitian Creole. For most of modern history, however, the official language of government, business, and education has been French.

    2 more annotations...

    • he Hopi are an American Indian group in Arizona. The term "Hopi" means "one who behaves" or "one who follows the proper way." The Hopi lived aboriginally in the same location they now inhabit, the northeastern quadrant of Arizona. Their reservation is completely surrounded by the Navajo reservation.
    • The Hopi language belongs to the Shoshonean branch of Uto-Aztecan. There are minor dialectical differences among the three Mesas (First, Second, and Third) on which Hopi villages are situated.

    4 more annotations...

    • Two basic types of organization were found: a tribal system, based on descent, and a feudal system, based on class and land ownership. The latter is progressively becoming assimilated into the modern structure of the state of Iraq; the former, a patrilineal lineage system, survives only among the nomads and a minority of the farmers in the more isolated territories.
    • Kurdish tribal organization is a segmentary lineage organization of very simple type. The largest kinship unit, the tira     , is a maximal lineage, divisible into segments according to the charter of patrilineal descent. The genealogical depth of the tira varies. For the sedentary Hamawands (location: Kirkuk Liwa, Iraq), the apical ancestor is nine generations temoved from the present adult generation; for the nomadic Wurds Shatri (location: centering in Suleimani Liwa, Iraq), twelve generations.
    • The answer would seem to lie in the political structure. In the Kurdish lineage system, all groups are subject to a constant pressure towards segmentation and fission, unmodulated by the interlocking circles of identification normally associated with segmentary descent systems
    • Kurdish villages are characterized by a constant struggle for political power on the part of a majority of the adult men, at times even women. Such political power is proportional to the number of riflemen one can mobilize to support one's claims. In a patrilineal lineage system, a man can expect political support only from his agnatic relatives, those who by descent belong to his political sub-section; and the factions in the village tend to be alignments of the younger men of a small lineage segment around an older leader. These segments consist primarily of brothers, sons, and brothers' sons. The relation to the latter is most critical: it crosses the first potential line of cleavage between collateral branches. If a man alienates his nephews by refusing them their traditional rights, he loses their political support. If he, on the other hand, gives them his daughters in marriage, the ties are reinforced and lineage solidarity maintained. The girl's father creates an obligation on the part of his brother's son to give him political support by exempting him from paying the brideprice. No other son-in-law can, in the lineage system, fill this role as political supporter; consequently they must invariably pay brideprice. The transaction may thus be regarded as constituting a type of delayed exchange: the father receives political allegiance in his lifetime from his brother's son in return for the daughter which he gives him. In this way, the pattern of preferential father's brother's daughter marriage serves to reinforce the political implications of the lineage system.
    • The man, on the other hand, gave everything he owned at the time, perhaps assisted by his family, for a woman who was certainly to the taste of his female relatives, but not necessarily to his. Should he not like his bride after the marriage had taken place, he had in the first place invested a lot of money in this disappointment, and secondly had to maintain his case against the women of his family, who had selected her. A new wife of the four sanctioned by the Coran, depending upon one's economic circumstances, was another unknown ticket in the marriage lottery.
    • From the moment a man passed from the unmarried to the married state, he was for the rest of his life the head of a family. As the bride price was paid when marriage was contracted, the husband had not only the right but also the duty to keep the children  42       Granqvist 1931, 58.  Go to end note page  in the event of divorce. Quite small children, it is true, stayed with the mother until they had reached a certain age, but then returned to the father. In the event of a fresh marriage a man thus had no chance of leaving his children. The new wife, or wives, who entered his home took over the work of look after the brood of children that might already be there. This provided the children with a stable home and childhood, something that is not always the case in the West. The constant factors in the home were thus, theoretically, the father and the children, whilst the mother was the fluctuating point. This gave father, mother and children a mutual status quite different from the position of these three home elements in our culture.
    • The relations between husband and wife are highly variable, depending greatly on the personalities involved. In masouline theory, a wife should be submissive, obeying her husband's wishes as though they were commands and observing the same type of demeanor exhibited to her father.
    • The status of a bride within the family is greatly strengthened by the birth of her first son, and she may thereafter command much greater attention and respect from her husband and relatives by marriage.
    • With economic specialization goes a stratification of Haitian society, roughly drawn, but based on prestige and the command of economic resources, in which the following classes are informally recognized:
    • here are the  pauvres,    indigent folk, who for some reason have forfeited or otherwise lost their family connections and whatever they may have owned and now must actually beg to obtain enough to eat.

    2 more annotations...

    • According to the legal code, as well as actual practice of the upper classes, woman is man's definite inferior in rights.  7      7. See Louis Borno,  Code civil d'Haïti annoté    (Port-au-Prince, 1892), chap. VI, articles 196–201. The Haitian code follows closely that of Napoleon, and both conform in general to practice common among substantial people in the Haiti and France of the early nineteenth century. Spouses equally owe to each other fidelity, succor, and assistance; the husband owes protection to his wife, the wife obedience to her husband. Although the wife must live with her husband wherever he chooses, he conversely must receive her when she comes to live with him, and must provide food for her. No wife may purchase, sell, give, or otherwise alienate property without the consent of her husband; moreover, the husband alone has the administration of goods coming in the dowry, so long as the union endures.
    • Women may not vote, nor may they hold public office. Among the élite, in theory and in practice woman's place is in the home, caring for the household and the children. One might imagine himself in provincial France as he sees the daily life of upper-class Haitian women: the ordering of meals, directing of servants, sewing, shopping, visiting, party going, occasional novel reading, driving in the family car. Different from French practice, however, is the taboo against most manual labor: this is the task of servants only. The élite housewife may cook but not sweep, sew but not launder, bargain with a huckster but not carry home her purchases. A woman    of the upper classes would demean herself to enter business. Since the American Occupation, as a matter of fact, a few women have been daring enough to become secretaries and stenographers, but there seems to be nothing like a concerted movement for the “emancipation”    of élite women. There are schools for girls, but these do not reach as far as the schools for boys; women are not admitted to the law school or medical school, for a woman lawyer or doctor would be unthinkable in Haitian society.
    • a restricted resource base required that Hopi society Page: 115    structure itself on an inequitable distribution of land,” and that this Hopi “system of social stratification” was “nothing more than a translation of economic reality into the realm of the sacred,” with different lineages within a clan “defining the order of succession to the control of clan property.” This system of social stratification “worked to manage scarcity,” rather than abundance, and to restrict some individuals to fewer economic resources than others.
    •  Under no circumstances, could men have dominated Hopi society completely at the expense of women. Women owned the houses, even if it was their husbands that built them. Women owned the clan land. Women owned the produce from the land (Forde 1931:379–371). Women owned the seeds that were planted and even controlled the rights to particular varieties of crops. A man depended on his mother to give him seeds that he planted in the first year of residence in his wife's household, and thereafter depended on his wife's lineage's seeds (Whiting 1937). A woman reinforced her claim to land and its produce by having her husband farm it. A woman who was a clan's eldest member would have several fields at her disposal and would distribute them to her daughters upon their marriages. She would also have the right and the responsibility to settle any disputes concerning land use.
    • A clan's eldest female was known as the “clan mother” and also, of course, held the  wuya,    the “mother” or “heart” of a ceremony. If her husband happened to be chief of the secret society performing “her” ceremony, an elderly lady might well be the locus of a great many potential loyalties, even if those loyalties were not all of a personal nature. As Schlegel (1977:254) has noted, in Hopi society, “women usually get their way.”

    1 more annotation...

1 - 12 of 12
20 items/page
List Comments (0)