File Sharing
Score: 92
You navigate through the site with no problem. The updates were current, as well as the content of the article.
The access was quick and I had no problems with the videos and being able to get to specific links which were all compatible with the article in case I needed to do extra research. No citations and I would have thought the copyright would have been at the end of the article but wasn't.
Score: 88
60% of the 10 C's were visible on this website. Emailing the author who was visible at the beginning of the article which helps to identify with the source. I am starting to figure out quite a few webpages don't display if the article is copyrighted or not.
Score: 95
The USA Today is a credible news source. They use all the 10 C's are recognizable within the article I chose for my presentation. The only setback was not being able to email the author because the article us a few years old.
Pirate Software
Score: 96
This site gave me the credibility I was looking for when researching Pirate Software. The facts were accurate when formulating them when the 10 C's. Credibilty, Content, even Copyright at the bottom of the website.
Score: 79
The source I would consider credible for the information that was needed. The site was average at best. The author fulfill most of the 10 C's. Critical Thinking about software pirates and the statistics and sources for backing up his research was a key element. At the end of the article he stated some of his credentials which would allow me extra research on him if it was needed.
Score: 70
This one is a little tricky to evaluate because this was an academic paper from the school library and doesn't have a web site. Although the HTML Text which I run off of my computer was easy to access. The author had clear and precise thinking to addressing the subject of pirate software. 70% of the 10 C's were noticeable. Content, along with context were the key elements.
Hacking
Score: 98
There is not too much that you wouldn't considered credible coming from a news print publication like Time Magazine who prides themselves on making sure they have the most accurate sources with whatever story they come across.
Score: 98
PBS prides themselves on being precise when researching a story with credible sources. It's not too many times if at all PBS has had to re-cant a story because their source wasn't credible. Everything from navigating through the site to the content was Grade A.
Score: 97
The NBC website is great with the information being updated frequently. The 10 C's are visible when evaluating the article as the website contents completely accurate to navigate through with ease.
Virus
Score:94
It was easy to maneuver through. The author was right upfront within the article as was most of the 10 C's after going through the process. Overall the website was very credible to help with accurate information on viruses.
Score: 92
At times from personally reading the LA Times, they can be a little bias through their editorial. But what paper doesn't have its favorites. I like the fact the email was present after the article. Some more main-stream news websites didn't have that. But it helps me in case I need to email this author for further detail just in case some of their credibility is questioned. But, there were no issues when evaluating through the 10 C's as well.
Score: 93
Evaluating the web page to make sure to have the proper information helps to assess the credit of which this author comes across at being legitimate. The only thing was, their was no access to email.
Identity Theft
Score: 89
The author stood out mostly by letting us know the things he has done, which allows me to go back and check his credentials. He had email, as well as, website access from the article. The Critical Thinking could be read through his article and overall evaluation of the webpage was pretty good. I guess, I am always expecting a little more for the computer information based websites.
Score: 85
I want to do something different by adding a poll to help with my statement. Evaluating the webpage helped and was solid with the criteria but the 10 C's was more challenging in making sure to be a credible source. It barely passed.
Score: 81
The article was solid with its information. The author was easily identifiable, along with her email. But the site took some time to load. But overall it was still good. The majority of the 10 C's could be recognized within the article.