Joyce and Shower Staff Development Model:
1.Theory
2. Demonstration or modeling
3. Initial practice
4. Prompt feedback
5. Coaching
The first of five components of this model is the presentation of theory or the description of a new skill or behavior deemed useful or desirable to the audience. This description is typically thirty minutes to one or two hours in length, and is provided in a one-way delivery mode to a passive audience. Imparting knowledge, as an outcome, can be accomplished in this single session.
The second component of the Joyce and Showers model is demonstration or modeling of the new strategy or skill. Like the first component, delivery is one-way and no audience action is required. The third component is initial practice in a protected or simulated setting - most often in the workshop session. The audience now participates, trying out the new skill. Promptly providing structured and open-ended feedback about performance of the practice is the fourth component.
The fifth component is coaching. As the new idea or skill is being applied and tried in classrooms (or wherever the workplace), follow up attention to help with the at-home implementation is given to the staff development participant.
Joyce and Shower Staff Development Model:
1.Theory
2. Demonstration or modeling
3. Initial practice
4. Prompt feedback
5. Coaching
This Critical Issue provides practical information for promoting technology use in schools.
This was a critique from 1999. Many teachers are still using technology for only one hour week ten years later.
Keeping computers in one place may be a barrier to usage.
Showers (quoted in Asayesh, 1993) describes the component of organizational change that accompanies effective professional development:
"[Effective professional development is] intensive enough to allow people to develop new knowledge and skills. And it has a component in the workplace as well as in the training environment. Somehow there's a support system that follows teachers into the workplace and either provides continuing training or some kind of structure enabling teachers to continue solving problems in the workplace." (p. 25)
Freed-Up Time. This strategy does not alter the school day, the school calendar, or the teaching schedule. Rather, it uses various short-term interventions that allow teachers to be released from their teaching responsibilities for blocks of time so they can focus on professional development activities. This approach requires the use of substitute teachers, administrators, teaching assistants, parent or community volunteers, or college interns to cover classes for the teachers.
Restructured or Rescheduled Time. This approach alters the time frame of the school day, the school calendar, or the teaching schedule. Schools may schedule early-release days for students, rework the teaching schedule so that there are longer periods and more planning time, create a first period for teachers before student arrival, or extend the school year for teacher professional development time.
Common Time. This strategy involves scheduling common planning periods for teachers who have similar grade levels, subject areas, or disciplines so that they can collaborate and plan together.
Better-Used Time. Instead of scheduling faculty meetings for administrative or informational purposes, this time is used for collaboration and professional growth. This strategy also can involve restricting time required for nonprofessional duties.
Purchased Time. The school district uses funds to pay teachers for professional development programs held during the summer or on evenings, hires additional teachers to reduce class size and increase planning periods, or provides a bank of substitute teachers who are available for half-day or full-day assignments.
A wealth of resources, created by Learning Point Associates or one of its partners, is available to support effective integration of technology in schools. In addition to several Web-based resources, the following products are a result of the Learning Point Associates work regarding educational technology.
ISSUE: Reform requires that teachers learn new roles and ways of teaching. That translates into a long-term developmental process requiring teachers to focus on changing their own practice. The problem is, where do teachers find the time for change in their already busy schedules? Unfortunately, "the demands posed by daily teaching and other aspects of the reform continue to absorb a bulk of teachers' energy, thought, and attention" (McDiarmid, 1995). This issue explores the vital concern of how to carve out time, opportunity, and other resources teachers need to realize the vision of education reform. Creating professional development opportunities that educators need in order to help all students achieve the ambitious learner goals of reform will require the support and ideas of everyone.
Carole Fine, NCREL's director of professional development, outlines a variety of purposes for using professional development time in her slide presentation "Time for What?"
Well-trained leaders are key to the success of any staff development effort.
It is easy to think of professional development as training for teachers. But in a growing number of states and districts attention has shifted to supporting and teaching principals and other school administrators.