He maintained throughout, however, that in spite of their apparent conflicts of interest, neither Reis nor Stamos had conspired to defraud their friend’s estate
It was a complex, precise, and untenable position that had no place in legal or journalistic narratives of genius, wronged orphans, and art-world wickedness, and he got absolutely hammered for it
The dialogue is based on Seldes’s account, which is in turn based on my dad’s testimony.
He never doubted that Reis and Stamos had good intentions, apparently: Reis was already a millionaire and certainly didn’t need Marlborough’s $20,000 director’s salary.
And Stamos had been negotiating with Marlborough even before Rothko died—a relationship Rothko himself had instigated.
He was debriefed, deposed, examined, and cross-examined for thousands of pages
Art News, suggested that Rothko had been murdered.
The executors were portrayed as vultures, false friends who had simply been waiting to pounce;