• The Trinity makes no sense. It isn't logical.
• • Col 2:9 is a pretty big one.
• Following is a brief chart that helps clarify how the doctrine of the Trinity is arrived at through the Bible.
• Col. 2:9
• The above chart is representative and not complete, but it shows that there is scriptural support for the doctrine. We see that the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit each are called God, each are called creator, each indwells, etc.  We know that the Father speaks to the Son and the Holy Spirit speaks as well.  So, there are three persons, not three gods.  Following is another way of illustrating the Trinity.

3 more annotations...

•  

  The Trinity:   One God or Three?

• In particular, the custom of the Easter egg originated amongst the early Christians of Mesopotamia, who stained eggs red in memory of the blood of Christ, shed at his crucifixion.^[8][9] The Christian Church officially adopted the custom, regarding the eggs as a symbol of the resurrection; in A.D. 1610, Pope Paul V proclaimed the following prayer:^[8][9]

• • Who else is called Queen of Heaven today?
• Other names for Semiramis, the Mother Goddess include: Wife of Baal, Ashtaroth or Ashtoreth, and
• Queen of Heaven

1 more annotation...

• The Trinity: The Oneness and Plurality of God

• The Papal Bull of indulgence gave no sanction whatever to this proposition. It was a vague scholastic opinion, rejected by the Sorbonne in 1482, and again in 1518, and certainly not a doctrine of the Church, which was thus improperly put forward as dogmatic truth. The first among the theologians of the Roman court, Cardinal Cajetan, was the enemy of all such extravagances, and declared emphatically that, even if theologians and preachers taught such opinions, no faith need be given them. "Preachers," said he, "speak in the name of the Church only so long as they proclaim the doctrine of Christ and His Church; but if, for purposes of their own, they teach that about which they know nothing, and which is only their own imagination, they must not be accepted as mouthpieces of the Church. No one must be surprised if such as these fall into error."

• Primer on Indulgences
• Indulgences are part of the Church’s infallible teaching. This means that no Catholic is at liberty to disbelieve in them. The Council of Trent stated that it "condemns with anathema those who say that indulgences are useless or that the Church does not have the power to grant them"(Trent, session 25, Decree on Indulgences). Trent’s anathema places indulgences in the realm of infallibly defined teaching.

• Was Peter in Rome?
• What Archaeology Proved

• • nullIt would seem. In order to tie the seemingly contridictory passages. ( Which aren't).  When you die you are immediately in heaven or hell. At, the second coming, Jesus and his saints, ( the believers) comes the saints bodies rise from corruption to incorruption  to meet him and them in the air.  Where the biggest mammy jammer of a war is taken upon. -- 2013-04-17
    You know he knew us before we were  born.  Before we had bodies.  So, we do exist without bodies.  However, I don't know why we need them back? -- 2013-04-17
    
• • So, did apostle Paul have a problem with belief in the promises of Christ?  "hopeful confidence in the promises of Christ?)