evgeny yauhenio's Library tagged mind →  View Popular

Donald Davidson was one of the most important philosophers of the latter half of the twentieth century. His ideas, presented in a series of essays from the 1960's onwards, have been influential across a range of areas from semantic theory through to epistemology and ethics. Davidson's work exhibits a breadth of approach, as well as a unitary and systematic character, which is unusual within twentieth century analytic philosophy. Thus, although he acknowledged an important debt to W. V. O. Quine, Davidson's thought amalgamates influences (though these are not always explicit) from a variety of sources, including Quine, C. I. Lewis, Frank Ramsey, Immanuel Kant and the later Wittgenstein. And while often developed separately, Davidson's ideas nevertheless combine in such a way as to provide a single integrated approach to the problems of knowledge, action, language and mind. The breadth and unity of his thought, in combination with the sometimes-terse character of his prose, means that Davidson is not an easy writer to approach. Yet however demanding his work might sometimes appear, this in no way detracts from either the significance of that work or the influence it has exercised and will undoubtedly continue to exercise. Indeed, in the hands of Richard Rorty and others, and through the widespread translation of his writings, Davidson's ideas have reached an audience that extends far beyond the confines of English-speaking analytic philosophy. Of late twentieth century American philosophers, perhaps only Quine has had a similar reception and influence.

plato.stanford.edu/...davidson - Preview

davidson donald davidson philosophyer language mind

Anomalous Monism is a theory of the relationship between mental and physical events and properties developed by Donald Davidson. It holds that every causally interacting mental event is identical to some physical event — particular mental events (tokens) are the very same events as particular physical events (token-identity, or monism). But it also claims that there can be no strict laws on the basis of which any mental event-type can predict, explain, be predicted or explained – therefore, mental properties cannot be reduced to physical properties (mental anomalism).

While neither of these components of the view, on its own, is novel, their relation is. According to Anomalous Monism, it is precisely because there can be no such strict laws that causally interacting mental events must be identical to some physical event. Previous identity theories of mind had held that claims concerning the identity of particular mental and physical events depended upon the discovery of lawlike relations between mental and physical properties. Empirical evidence for such laws was thus held to be required for particular identity claims. Davidson's position is dramatically different – it requires no empirical evidence and depends on there being no lawlike relations. It in effect justifies the token-identity of mental and physical events through arguing for the impossibility of type-identities between mental and physical properties or kinds.

The appeal of Anomalous Monism is due to these enigmatic features, a fairly straightforward argumentative structure, and its attempt to bring together an intuitively acceptable metaphysics with a sophisticated understanding of the relation between psychological and physical explanatory schemes.

If Davidson were willing to permit mental properties and, at the same time, regard them as irreducible
to physical properties, this begs the question: How did these mental properties get caused by the
physical properties of the brain?
8. Davidson resisted the very notion of properties and the conve

plato.stanford.edu/...anomalous-monism - Preview

davidson mind philosophy monism

Worries about mental causation are prominent in contemporary discussions of the mind and human agency. Originally, the problem of mental causation was that of understanding how a mental substance (thought to be immaterial) could interact with a material substance, a body. Most philosophers nowadays repudiate immaterial minds, but the problem of mental causation has not gone away. Instead, focus has shifted to mental properties. How could mental properties be causally relevant to bodily behavior? How could something mental qua mental cause what it does? After looking at the traditional Problem of Interaction, we survey various versions of the property-based problem and look at proposed solutions to them.

Mind-body interaction has a central place in our pretheoretic conception of agency. Gus's barking his shin produces a feeling of pain, which in turn causes Gus to seek his mother's comfort. When Lilian deliberates over competing courses of action, settles on one of these, and forms an intention to act, it is her forming the intention, a mental occurrence, that leads to her subsequent behavior. Such examples are part of the commonsense picture we have of ourselves.

It's not surprising, then, that questions about mind-body interaction often accompany philosophical reflection about the nature of the mind. Indeed, mental causation often figures explicitly in formulations of the mind-body problem. Campbell (1984), for instance, presents the mind-body problem in the form of four assertions:

While causal relationships might be plausibly defended in attempts to close the explanatory gap, they pose problems. How can a mental activity cause a physical activity? A physicalistic solution is unsatisfactory because mental life is not reducible into physicalistic terms and concepts. It can be argued that matters of causation are principally matters of science, not philosophy. Moreover, much of daily life does not lend itself to causal explanations.

plato.stanford.edu/...mental-causation - Preview

mental mentalcausastion philosophy mind

Kant's primary aim is to determine the limits and scope of pure reason. That is, he wants to know what reason alone can determine without the help of the senses or any other faculties. Metaphysicians make grand claims about the nature of reality based on pure reason alone, but these claims often conflict with one another. Furthermore, Kant is prompted by Hume's skepticism to doubt the very possibility of metaphysics.
 
Kant draws two important distinctions: between a priori and a posteriori knowledge and between analytic and synthetic judgments. A posteriori knowledge is the particular knowledge we gain from experience, and a priori knowledge is the necessary and universal knowledge we have independent of experience, such as our knowledge of mathematics. In an analytic judgment, the concept in the predicate is contained in the concept in the subject, as, for instance, in the judgment, “a bachelor is an unmarried man.” (In this context, predicate refers to whatever is being said about the subject of the sentence—for instance, “is an unmarried man.”) In a synthetic judgment, the predicate concept contains information not contained in the subject concept, and so a synthetic judgment is informative rather than just definitional.

He said that practical reason is possible; we can know certain reliable truths with reason—a practical
reason.
2. The key theme here and in Kant’s other work is that the basic conditions of thought are not derived
from sensory experience.
3. These conditions are in the mind itself, a priori, in forms and categories that are present before sense
perception takes place.
4. For example, the mind uses categories of time and space to organize the meaning of objects we
encounter in the world, but these categories are not inherent in the objects our senses perceive.
5. The mind is, therefore, an active shaping agent, not simply the passive recipient of sensory input.

www.sparknotes.com/...section1.html - Preview

reason kant empiricism skepticism mind rational

According to Collingwood, the science which is dedicated to the study of mind is history. Collingwood's philosophy of mind and action is thus to be found in his philosophy of history, primarily in The Idea of History (1946) and The Principles of History (1999) both of which were posthumously published. The claim that history is the study of mind is prima facie counter-intuitive because many of us tend to think of history as a descriptive science of the past rather than as a normative science of thought. Collingwood's claim that history is the study of mind is in line with the distinction between the Naturwissenschaften and the and Geisteswissenschaften that is found in continental philosophy of social science.

Collingwood arrives at the claim that history is the study of mind by reflecting on what we mean when we use the word ‘history’. He claims that when speaking about history we do not usually mean ‘natural history’. For example, we would not class palaeontology as a historical science. In ordinary usage history tends to be identified not with natural history but with the history of human affairs. Moreover, if we reflect carefully on what we mean by history, we find that we do not mean the history of human beings in so far as they are purely natural beings, but a history of human beings in so far as they are rational beings. There is an evolutionary history of the species homo sapiens, but such a natural history is not what we properly mean when we speak about human history. We tend to identify history in the proper sense with the history of human beings not in so far as they are natural beings but in so far as they are civilized beings:

plato.stanford.edu/...collingwood - Preview

collingwood history mind ttc_search_past theory neo-idealism idealism

Higher-order theories of consciousness try to explain the distinctive properties of consciousness in terms of some relation obtaining between the conscious state in question and a higher-order representation of some sort (either a higher-order perception of that state, or a higher-order thought or belief about it). The most challenging properties to explain are those involved in phenomenal consciousness — the sort of state that has a subjective dimension, that has ‘feel’, or that it is like something to undergo. These properties will form the focus of this article.

plato.stanford.edu/...consciousness-higher - Preview

consciousness higher-order mind consciouss

Panpsychism, in philosophy, is either the view that all parts of matter involve mind, or the more holistic view that the whole universe is an organism that possesses a mind (see Pantheism and Panentheism). It is thus a stronger and more ambitious view than hylozoism, which holds only that all things are alive. This is not to say that panpsychism believes that all matter is alive or even conscious but rather that the constituent parts of matter are composed of some form of mind and are sentient.....David Chalmers proposes a fairly wild direction in which to look for a physical theory that would answer the
hard problem.
A. Chalmers argues that we will have to change our scientific worldview to accommodate consciousness.
1. Consciousness should be added as a further fundamental principle, operating throughout the universe.
2. Chalmers proposes a form of Panpsychism, according to which everything—electrons included—has
an aspect of consciousness. Everything—electrons included—has some form of subjective experience.

en.wikipedia.org/Panpsychism - Preview

chalmers mind consciousness

Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness is a 1994 book by mathematical physicist Roger Penrose, and serves as a followup to his 1989 book The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds and The Laws of Physics.

In the book, Penrose expounds upon his previous assertions that human consciousness is non-algorithmic, and thus is not capable of being modeled by a conventional Turing machine-type of digital computer. Penrose hypothesizes that quantum mechanics plays an essential role in the understanding of human consciousness, specifically that microtubules within neurons provide the brain with the hardware necessary to perform quantum computation and therefore that the collapse of the quantum wavefunction plays an important role in brain function.

en.wikipedia.org/...ssing_Science_of_Consciousness - Preview

penrose mind algorithm consciousness neurons

The cocktail party effect describes the ability to focus one's listening attention on a single talker among a mixture of conversations and background noises, ignoring other conversations.[1] This effect reveals one of the surprising abilities of our auditory system, which enables us to talk in a noisy place.

The cocktail party phenomenon can occur both when we are paying attention to one of the sounds around us and when it is invoked by a stimulus which grabs our attention suddenly.[2] For example, when we are talking with our friend in a crowded party, we still can listen and understand what our friend says even if the place is very noisy, and can simultaneously ignore what another nearby person is saying. Then if someone over the other side of the party room calls out our name suddenly, we also notice that sound and respond to it immediately. The hearing reaches a noise suppression from 9 to 15 dB, i.e., the acoustic source, on which humans concentrate, seems to be three times louder than the ambient noise. A microphone recording in comparison will show the big difference.

en.wikipedia.org/...Cocktail_party_effect - Preview

hearing illusion cognition mind

Ned Block (born 1942) is a philosopher of mind who has made important contributions to matters of consciousness and cognitive science. He obtained his Ph.D. from Harvard University under Hilary Putnamand was a professor of philosophy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) for many years, and now teaches at New York University (NYU).

Block is noted for presenting the Blockhead argument against the Turing Test as a test of intelligence in a paper entitled Psychologism and Behaviourism (1981). He is also known for his criticism of functionalism, arguing that a system with the same functional states as a human is not necessarily conscious. In his more recent work on consciousness, he has made a distinction between phenomenal consciousness and access consciousness, where phenomenal consciousness consists of subjective experience and feelings and access consciousness consists of that information globally available in the cognitive system for the purposes of reasoning, speech and high-level action control. He has argued that access consciousness and phenomenal consciousness might not always coincide in human beings.

en.wikipedia.org/Ned_Block - Preview

block mind chinese nation philosophy

What is fringe consciousness? Imagine that our focal conscious experiences are surrounded by a vaguer "penumbra," to represent what William James called "fringe consciousness." If we take focal consciousness to include immediate, detailed experiences, the "fringe" would cover those cases in which we have reliable access to information without being able to experience it explicitly in detail. Dr. Bruce Mangan has helped revive a philosophical tradition about the fringe, including such experiences as feelings of knowing, of familiarity, beauty and goodness, of something not quite fitting, or a sudden profound feeling of rightness. A surprising amount of our mental life is occupied with fringe events, which may be experienced as fuzzy or vague, but which have properties suggesting that something very precise is going on.

Take the “feeling of knowing” that comes when we ask a question like "What is the name of the flying reptiles of the dinosaur age?" Most of us have trouble finding the answer right away, but we know that we know it, and rightly so. Feelings of knowing have been studied extensively, and the evidence indicates that (1) they are quite accurate most of the time; (2) they receive high confidence ratings; but (3) they do not involve detailed, structured experiences, unlike the sight of a coffee cup, where we can talk about shape, color, shading, texture, and many other details.

We have "feelings of knowing" about items in working memory that are not currently conscious. Moreover, we seem to have feelings of knowing about things that are readily available to consciousness, though they are not conscious at the moment --- our ability to retrieve known words, our mood, our ability to act and control some mental functions, our basic knowledge about friends, family and ourselves, and much more.

www.scholarpedia.org/...Consciousness - Preview

consciousness fring consciousness mind body

The cognitive elite of a society, according to some social science researchers, are those having higher intelligence levels and thus better prospects for success in life. The development of a cognitive elite during the 20th century is presented in the book "The Bell Curve" written by Richard J. Herrnstein and Charles Murray and published by Free Press Paperbacks in 1996. The book "The Bell Curve" proposes that the cognitive elite has been produced by a more technological society which offers enough high skill jobs for those with a higher intelligence to fill. "The Bell Curve" also proposes that by removing race, gender or class as criteria the main criteria of success in academic and professional life is becoming primarily based on cognitive ability.

en.wikipedia.org/...Cognitive_elite - Preview

elite cognitive race group mind

The Extended Mind refers to an emerging concept within the philosophy of mind that addresses the question as to the division point between the mind and the environment by promoting the view of active externalism. This view proposes that some objects in the external environment are utilized by the mind in such a way that the objects can be seen as extensions of the mind itself. Specifically, the mind is seen to encompass every level of the cognitive process, which will often include the use of environmental aids.

The primary body of work in the field is The Extended Mind, by Andy Clark and David Chalmers. In this paper, Clark and Chalmers present the idea of active externalism, (similar to semantic or "content" externalism,) in which objects within the environment function as a part of the mind. They argue that it is arbitrary to say that the mind is contained only within the boundaries of the skull.

en.wikipedia.org/...Extended_mind - Preview

chalmers clark mind extended mind neuroscience

Andy Clark is a Professor of Philosophy and Chair in Logic and Metaphysics at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland. Before this he was director of the Cognitive Science Program at Indiana University in Bloomington. Previously, he taught at Washington University at St. Louis and the University of Sussex in England. Clark is one of the founding members of the Contact collaborative research project whose aim is to investigate the role environment plays in shaping the nature of conscious experience. Professor Clark’s papers and books deal with the philosophy of mind and he is considered a leading scientist in mind extension. He has also written extensively on connectionism, robotics, and the role and nature of mental representation. Clark is perhaps most famous for his defence of the hypothesis of the Extended mind. According to Clark, the dynamic loops through which mind and world interact are not merely instrumental. The cycle of activity that runs from brain through body and world and back again actually constitutes cognition. The mind, on this account, is not bounded by the biological organism but extends into the environment of that organism. Consider two subjects carry out a mathematical task. The first completes the task solely in her head, while the second completes the task with the assistance of paper and pencil. By Clark’s ‘parity principle’, as long as the cognitive results are the same there is no reason to count the means employed by the two subjects as different. The process of cognition in the second case involves paper and pencil, and the conception of ‘mind’ appropriate to this subject must include these environmental items.

en.wikipedia.org/Andy_Clark - Preview

andy clark mind cognitive mind cognition

The simulation theory of empathy attempts to explain how humans understand others' emotions and sensations. It posits that observing others’ experiences activates shared neural networks of viewers so that people can experience the emotions and sensations of the observed. For example, people feel disgust when they see others smell bad odor,[1] they feel pain when they see others being pierced by a needle or get electrical shock,[2] they sense touching when they see others being brushed,[3] and they feel sad when they see others’ sad facial expressions

en.wikipedia.org/...e_Simulation_Theory_of_Empathy - Preview

empathy other minds mind theory theory of mind

Theory of mind" is the ability to attribute mental states—beliefs, intents, desires, pretending, knowledge, etc.—to oneself and others and to understand that others have beliefs, desires and intentions that are different from one's own. Theory of mind is the ability to attribute mental states—beliefs, intents, desires, pretending, knowledge, etc.—to oneself and others. As originally defined, it enables one to understand that mental states can be the cause of—and thus be used to explain and predict—others’ behavior.[2] Being able to attribute mental states to others and understanding them as causes of behavior means, in part, that one must be able to conceive of the mind as a “generator of representations”[3][4] and to understand that others’ mental representations of the world do not necessarily reflect reality and can be different from one’s own. It also means one must be able to maintain, simultaneously, different representations of the world. It is a ‘theory’ of mind in that such representations are not "directly observable".[5] Many other human abilities—from skillful social interaction to language use—are said to involve a theory of mind

en.wikipedia.org/...Theory_of_mind - Preview

theory theory mind theory of mind other minds neuroscience philosophy of mind

Josh Bongard is a professor in the University of Vermont. He received his Bachelors degree in Computer Science from McMaster University, Canada, his Masters degree from the University of Sussex, UK, and his PhD from the University of Zurich, Switzerland. He served as a postdoctoral associate under Hod Lipson in the Computational Synthesis Laboratory at Cornell University from 2003 to 2006.

He is the co-author of the popular science book entitled "How the Body Shapes the Way We Think: A New View of Intelligence", MIT Press, November 2006. (With Rolf Pfeifer) ISBN 0-262-16239-3.

en.wikipedia.org/...Josh_Bongard - Preview

bongard biography mind body philosopher

How could the body influence our thinking when it seems obvious that the brain controls the body? In How the Body Shapes the Way We Think, Rolf Pfeifer and Josh Bongard demonstrate that thought is not independent of the body but is tightly constrained, and at the same time enabled, by it. They argue that the kinds of thoughts we are capable of have their foundation in our embodiment--in our morphology and the material properties of our bodies....Professor Josh Bongard and his colleagues have constructed a robot that learns its body. A. The star robot first constructs and tests theories of its own body form in terms of feedback from its sensors.

www.cs.uvm.edu/~jbongard - Preview

bongard body language mind robot

In criminal law, mens rea -- the Latin term for "guilty mind"[1] -- is usually one of the necessary elements of a crime. The standard common law test of criminal liability is usually expressed in the Latin phrase, actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea, w

en.wikipedia.org/Mens_rea - Preview

"guilty mind" "mens rea" mind brain law intention

Functionalism is a theory of the mind in contemporary philosophy, developed largely as an alternative to both the identity theory of mind and behaviourism. Its core idea is that mental states (beliefs, desires, being in pain, etc.) are constituted solely by their functional role — that is, their causal relations to other mental states, sensory inputs, and behavioral outputs. Since mental states are identified by a functional role, they are said to be multiply realizable; in other words, they are able to be manifested in various systems, even perhaps computers, so long as the system performs the appropriate functions. While functionalism has its advantages, there have been several arguments against it, claiming that it is an insufficient account of the mind.

en.wikipedia.org/...tionalism_(philosophy_of_mind) - Preview

functionalism philosophy of mind mental states neuroscience brains mind