Skip to main content

Weiye Loh's Library tagged Google   View Popular, Search in Google

Mar
14
2012


Google Scholar Citations provides a simple way for authors to keep track of citations to their articles. You can check who is citing your publications, graph citations over time, and compute several citation metrics. You can also make your profile public, so that it may appear in Google Scholar results when people search for your name, e.g., richard feynman.

Best of all, it's quick to set up and simple to maintain - even if you have written hundreds of articles, and even if your name is shared by several different scholars. You can add groups of related articles, not just one article at a time; and your citation metrics are computed and updated automatically as Google Scholar finds new citations to your work on the web. You can even choose to have your list of articles updated automatically - but, of course, you can also choose to review the updates yourself, or to manually update your articles at any time.

Get started with Google Scholar Citations.


Setting up your profile

How do I create my author profile?

You can sign up for a Google Scholar Citations profile. It's quick and free.

First, create a regular Google account, or sign in to the one you already have. We recommend that you use a personal account, not an account at your employer, so that you can keep your profile for as long as you wish.
Once you've signed in to your Google account, the Citations sign up form will ask you to confirm the spelling of your name, and to enter your affiliation, interests, etc. We recommend that you also enter your university email address, because that would make your profile eligible for inclusion in Google Scholar search results.
On the next page, you'll see groups of articles written by people with names similar to yours. Click "Add all articles" next to each article group that is yours, or "See all articles" to add specific articles from that group. If you don't see your articles in these groups, click "Search articles" to do a regular Google Scholar search, and then add your articles one at a time. Feel free to do as many searches as you like.
Once you're done with adding articles, it will ask you what to do when the article data changes in Google Scholar. You can either have the updates applied to your profile automatically, or you can choose to review them beforehand. In either case, you can always go to your profile and make changes by hand.
Finally, you will see your profile. This is a good time to make a few finishing touches - upload your professional looking photo, visit your university email inbox and click on the verification link, double check the list of articles, and, once you're completely satisfied, make your profile public. Voila - it's now eligible to appear in Google Scholar when someone searches for your name!
Some of my articles are not in my profile. How do I add missing articles?

Select the "Add" option from the Actions menu. Search for your articles using titles, keywords, or your name.

To add one article at a time, click "Search articles" and then "Add article" next to the article you wish to add. Your citation metrics will update immediately to account for the articles you added.

If your search doesn't find the right article, click "Add article manually". Then, type in the title, the authors, etc., and click "Save". Keep in mind that citations to manually added articles may not appear in your profile for a few days.

To add a group of related articles, click "Search article groups" and then "Add all articles" next to the group you wish to add. If you have written articles under different names, with multiple groups of colleagues, or in different journals, you may need to select multiple groups. Your citation metrics will update immediately to account for the groups you added.

Some of the articles in my profile aren't mine. Why are they included in my profile?

Alas, we have no way of knowing which articles are really yours. Author names are often abbreviated and different people sometimes share similar names. We use a statistical model to try to tell different authors apart but such automatic processes are not always accurate. The best way to fix this is to look through the articles in your profile and remove the ones that were written by others.

How do I remove articles that aren't mine?

Select the articles you would like to remove. Then, choose the "Delete" option from the Actions menu.

I deleted one of the articles in my profile by mistake. How do I fix this?

Deleted articles are moved to the Trash. To view articles in the Trash, select the "View Trash" option from the Actions menu. To restore an article from the Trash, select the article and click the "Restore" button.

The description of one of my articles isn't correct. How do I fix it?

Click the title of the article and then click the "Edit" button. When you finish your changes, click the "Save" button.

If you've made substantial changes to the article, please keep the following in mind.

The list of "Scholar articles" at the bottom of the page may no longer match the article you've edited. We recommend that you review this list and "unmerge" the Scholar articles that no longer correspond to your article. Scholar articles affect the computation of your "Cited by" counts and citation metrics.
As with manual additions of articles, it may take several days for all citations to the edited article to be collected in your profile. You can speed up the process by adding the appropriate article from Google Scholar and then merging it with your version; then, your citation metrics will update right away.
It's possible that the article you've edited was already in your profile as a separate record. We recommend that you merge duplicate records - click the "Title/Author" column header to sort your articles by title, select the checkboxes next to the duplicate entries, which should now be adjacent, and then select the "Merge" option from the Actions menu.
My profile shows the same article twice. How do I fix this?

Select both versions of the article. Next, choose the "Merge" option from the Actions menu. You will then see both citations for the article listed. Click "Select" next to the best citation to the article (you can edit it later if you wish). This will merge the two versions. Your citation counts and citation metrics will automatically update to count the versions you've merged as a single article, not two different articles.

I merged a version with 27 citations with the one with 4 citations. How come the merged article has 30 citations - shouldn't it be 31?

Nope, the "Cited by" count after the merge is the number of papers that cite the merged article. One of these probably cites both versions that you've merged, the 27+4=31 formula counts this citation twice. But if the count has dropped below 27... ugh, please do let us know.

Why is there a ∗ next to my article's "Cited by" count?

The ∗ indicates that the "Cited by" count includes citations that might not match this article. It is an estimate made automatically by a computer program. You can check these citations by clicking on the article's title and looking for "Scholar articles" with a ∗ next to their title.


Making your profile public

Will my profile be visible to others?

Your profile is private and visible only to you until and unless you make your profile public.

How do I make my profile public?

Click the "Edit" link next to "My profile is private" and select the "My profile is public" option.

How do I see what my profile will look like to others before I make it public?

Click the "Edit" link next to "My profile is private". Next, click "Preview public version".

How do I link to my public profile?

Click the "Link" link next to "My profile is public". That will show the Public URL for your profile which you can add to your homepage or email to your colleagues. Highlight it with the mouse and paste it wherever you wish.

I have changed my mind about making my profile public. How do I make it private again?

Click the "Edit" link next to "My profile is public". Select the "My profile is private" option.

My profile is already public. Is there anything else I need to do to make it available for inclusion in Google Scholar search results?

You also need to add a verified email address at your university or institution.

To be eligible for inclusion in Google Scholar search results, your profile needs to be public and needs to have a verified email address at your university (non-institutional email addresses, such as gmail.com, hotmail.com, aol.com, yahoo.com, qq.com, etc., are not suitable for this purpose). To add a verified email to your profile, click the "Edit" link next to "No verified email", add your email address at your institution and click "Save". We will send you an email message with a verification link. Once you click on this link, the email address will be marked verified. Your profile will now be eligible for inclusion in Google Scholar search results.

Rest assured, we will NOT display your email address on your public profile. Nor will we sell it, trade it, or use it to send you email unrelated to Google Scholar.


Exploring citations to your articles

How do I see the list of citations to one of my articles?

Click the "Cited by" number for the article.

How do I see the citation graph for one of my articles?

Click the title of the article.

How do I get notified about new citations to one of my articles?

Click the "Cited by" number for your article and then click the envelope icon in the green bar below the search box. Then we'll email you when newly published articles cite yours.

Why is the "Cited by" count for one of my articles crossed out?

Google Scholar considers this article the same as another article in your profile. We display the "Cited by" count next to both of the duplicates, but we only count them once in your citation metrics.

We recommend that you merge the duplicates - select both the articles and choose "Merge" from the "Actions" menu.

I like other citation metrics. Do you plan to add the g-index or the e-index? Or maybe average citations per article?

Probably not. We compute two versions, All and Recent, of three metrics - h-index, i10-index and the total number of citations. While there's no shortage of other reasonable metrics, the incremental usefulness of adding each number generally goes down, while the user confusion generally goes up.

The number of citations to one of my articles is too low. I know of several articles citing it that are not included in the list of citations. What I can do to help fix this?

Your "Cited by" counts come from the Google Scholar index. You can change the articles in your profile, but citations to them are computed and updated automatically as we update Google Scholar.

To change the "Cited by" counts in your profile, you would need to have them updated in Google Scholar. Google Scholar generally reflects the state of the web as it is currently visible to our search robots and to the majority of users. If some of the citations to your article are not included, chances are that the citing articles are not accessible to our search robots or are formatted in ways that make it difficult for our indexing algorithms to identify their bibliographic data or references.

To fix this, you'll need to identify the specific citing articles with indexing problems and work with the publisher of these articles to make the necessary changes (see our inclusion guidelines for details). For most publishers, it usually takes 3-6 months for the changes to be reflected in Google Scholar; for very large publishers, it can take much longer.


Updates to your profile

How do I make sure that my citation metrics and the graph of citations is kept up to date?

You don't need to do anything! Your citation metrics and citation graph will be automatically updated whenever Google Scholar is updated.

I would like my list of articles to be automatically updated. How can I do that?

Select the "Profile updates" option from the Actions menu. Choose the automatic updates setting and click "Update settings". Your profile will be automatically updated when Google Scholar is updated.

This setting only controls the updates to your list of articles. It does not control the updates to your "Cited by" counts and citation metrics - those are always updated to reflect the current state of the web.

I have opted for automated updates. However, a recent article that I have written has not been automatically added to my profile. How can I fix this?

See here for how to add missing articles to your profile.

How do I stop automated updates to my profile?

Select the "Profile updates" option from the Actions menu. Choose the confirmation email setting and click "Update settings". When we identify suitable updates for your profile, we'll send you an email message so that you can review and apply the updates.

I have edited some of the articles in my profile. How do I keep the automated updates from overriding my changes?

You don't need to do anything. Automated updates will not make changes to an article that you have edited.


Reviewing updates to your profile

Why does the updates page say that one of my articles is a duplicate entry?

This happens when the Google Scholar search index changes, and it now considers this entry a duplicate of some other article in your profile. This could happen, e.g., if the publisher re-formats their papers or fixes a typo. We recommend that you accept this suggestion. You can, of course, choose to keep duplicate entries in your profile, but only one of them will be counted towards your citation metrics.

Why does the updates page say that one of my articles is not matched in Google Scholar?

This happens when the Google Scholar search index has changed, and we have been unable to match an article in your profile with the new index. Most of the time, this is because it was considered to be a duplicate of some other article in your profile, but we weren't able to determine which one. Occasionally, the article may have been removed from Google Scholar entirely, e.g., because it's no longer available on the web, or because articles that reference it have become unavailable to our search robots.

To check if the article is a duplicate, go to your profile, click the "Title/Author" header to sort by title, and look for the article in question. If the same article is indeed listed multiple times, you can safely accept the suggestion to delete the unmatched entry. However, if it isn't a duplicate entry, you can choose to keep it in your profile. Though, since it is not matched in Google Scholar, its "Cited by" count will be zero. Note that your decision to keep an unmatched entry in your profile will not reinstate the entry in Google Scholar - see the inclusion guidelines for help on including your articles in Google Scholar.


General Questions

I created my profile a while ago... where is it?

It's right here, and also under the link labeled "My citations" in the upper right of Google Scholar pages.

How do I export articles from my profile?

To export all articles from your profile, choose the "Export" option from the Actions menu. To export specific articles, select the desired articles and then choose the "Export" option. You can pick the format for the exported articles using the menu on the export page.

My colleague would like to use Google Scholar Citations. Can I invite her?

Absolutely! Fill in her name and email address in the form on the right sidebar of your profile, and click "Send invitation". She will then need to open her email and click the invitation link to set up her profile.

If you would like to add her to your list of co-authors, select the "Inviting co-author" checkbox when you send the invitation. Once she accepts your invitation and creates her profile, a link to it will appear in your list of co-authors.

How do I sort the articles in my profile by publication date?

Click the column header labeled "Year".

I see my article, "Prosimian Basket-Weaving: A Critical Review", when I search for my name on Google Scholar. How come it's not in my profile?

See here for how to add missing articles to your profile.

How do I add a link to my homepage to my profile?

Click the "Add homepage" link. Add the URL for your homepage and click "Save".

I found a bug! Where do I report it?

Err, sorry... The best way to fix it depends on whether the problem appears when you search Google Scholar, or only when you view your profile.

First, try to reproduce the problem in regular Google Scholar search results. E.g., search Google Scholar for the title of the article in question, or for your name. If your article is listed incorrectly there, or if you believe its "Cited by" count is off, then refer to the inclusion guidelines. Chances are that you need to talk to your publisher to have it corrected.

If, however, the problem is specific to your profile, and does not affect normal Google Scholar search results, then please do let us know the details.

©2011 Google - Google Home - About Google - Privacy Policy
Feedback Diigo Web Highlighter (v1.6.9)
 Highlight     B

Google Academic Research Academia Citation

Google was run like an innovation factory, empowering employees to be entrepreneurial through founder’s awards, peer bonuses and 20% time. Our advertising revenue gave us the headroom to think, innovate and create. Forums like App Engine, Google Labs and open source served as staging grounds for our inventions. The fact that all this was paid for by a cash machine stuffed full of advertising loot was lost on most of us. Maybe the engineers who actually worked on ads felt it, but the rest of us were convinced that Google was a technology company first and foremost; a company that hired smart people and placed a big bet on their ability to innovate.

Google Innovation Advertising Capitalism Social Media

  • Google could still put ads in front of more people than Facebook, but Facebook knows so much more about those people. Advertisers and publishers cherish this kind of personal information, so much so that they are willing to put the Facebook brand before their own. Exhibit A: www.facebook.com/nike, a company with the power and clout of Nike putting their own brand after Facebook’s?
  • As it turned out, sharing was not broken. Sharing was working fine and dandy, Google just wasn’t part of it. People were sharing all around us and seemed quite happy. A user exodus from Facebook never materialized. I couldn’t even get my own teenage daughter to look at Google+ twice, “social isn’t a product,” she told me after I gave her a demo, “social is people and the people are on Facebook.” Google was the rich kid who, after having discovered he wasn’t invited to the party, built his own party in retaliation. The fact that no one came to Google’s party became the elephant in the room.
Feb
28
2012

  • The intention is good: it is to promote crowd-sourcing of maps, to improve planning in disasters and to improve the planning, management and monitoring of public services.  This is an important goal, which is now being made possible by new technologies and the spread of the internet.  The deal is sufficiently important for World Bank Managing Director Caroline Anstey to write about it in the opinion pages of the New York Times:

     

    Under the agreement, the bank and its development partners — developing country governments and U.N. agencies — will be able to access Google Map Maker’s global mapping platform, allowing the collection, viewing, search and free access to data of geoinformation in over 150 countries and 60 languages.

     

    This is all consistent with an admirable push in the World Bank towards ‘democratising development‘, including becoming more open about its own activities and promoting open data. Indeed, this effort has come to be a defining achievement of Robert Zoellick period as World Bank President.

  • Where [the World Bank] once imposed prescriptions on the Third World, it now shares knowledge with respected clients from the new world. Where it once hoarded data, it now displays it on the web. … One decade ago, the Bank was routinely accused of indifference to the views of local people. Today Mr Zoellick talks of empowering the most humble netizen to provide feedback on projects.
  • 5 more annotation(s)...
Feb
26
2012

Google has played every angle in recent months as it continues to expand its business. Now Google plays politics as it chooses well connected Republican, former Representative Susan Molinari to run its public policy team.

In the past Google has been associated with the Democratic party. Google Chairman Eric Schmidt is a top supporter of Obama and advised him during his 2008 campaign.

Google Politics

  • With more political battles ahead, by picking Susan Molinari for its Washington public policy team, Google is clearly attempting to play on both sides of the political spectrum.
Feb
22
2012

Google defines the +1 as a feature to help people discover and share relevant content from the people they already know and trust. Users can +1 different types of content, including Google search results, websites, and advertisements. Once users +1 a piece of content, it can be seen on the +1 tab in their Google+ profile, in Google search results, and on websites with a +1 button.

The plot thickened last month when Google launched Search plus Your World. Jack Menzel, director of product management for Google Search, explained that now Google+ users would be able to “search across information that is private and only shared to you, not just the public web.” According to Ian Lurie from the blog Conversation Marketing, in Search plus Your World, search results that received a lot of +1s tend to show up higher in results.

Google Search Engine Optimization Search Social Media

  • The +1 has an indirect effect on your site’s search rank. This does not mean the more +1’s a link has, the higher rank it achieves in traditional search results.
  • When a Google+ user +1’s a piece of content, he gives it his “stamp of approval.” Then, say one of his connections from Google+ searches for the same or related topic. Because of Search plus Your World, his friend is more likely to click on the same link the original user +1’d (when a signed-in user searches, his Google results may include snippets annotated with the names of connections who have +1′d the content). This is because content recommended by friends and acquaintances is often more relevant than content from strangers, according to Google.
  • 2 more annotation(s)...
Feb
12
2012

Some of the rumored tricks, like having a perfect GPA, are mostly hot air, says McDowell. Others, like attending an elite university, do determine how attractive candidates are to Google and Apple.
Here are some common missteps people make when applying to the tech giants, particularly when they're young and just starting ou

Resume Google Apple

Jan
25
2012

About four years ago, all Singapore government webpages were revamped to bear a standard search tool on the top right hand corner of each site. This standardisation must have seemed like a really good idea to unleash on halpless users. What they forgot to add was the warning about the true state of affairs, namely “This search engine sucks!”

Google SEO Search Engine Optimization Singapore Government

Dec
18
2011

The video in question, VVEBCAM, and its contents including the description field are part of an original artwork. On Saturday, December 10, 2011, the video was removed by YouTube staff because of its use of "spam" in the description. The video has been exhibited internationally, is discussed in several new media and contemporary art texts, and is taught in academic curricula. There are several texts published indicating the importance of the use of "spam" in the video's description. One of those texts (http://rhizome.org/artbase/artwork/53474/) is published by Rhizome, a leading New Media organization. It states that the "extensive and dizzying list of tags" used to lure the audience into viewing the video "mirror[s] its enactment of passive viewership". The video as it existed on YouTube, along with its description and comments is the work itself.

Art Search Google Regulation Spam

  • Surely a more judicious approach would for YouTube to simply not index the video tags for inclusion in search results. Removing the video entirely is clearly disproportionate.
  • It's not surprising that a video that has intentionally misleading tags was removed, particularly when the tags imply the video has racy content that would also violate YouTube policy if they were accurate.

    "I was breaking the rules for art" doesn't give you an exception to violate the policies everyone else is expected to follow. 
  • 1 more annotation(s)...
Oct
9
2011

When you enter phrases into the Google Books Ngram Viewer, it displays a graph showing how those phrases have occurred in a corpus of books (e.g., "British English", "English Fiction", "French") over the selected years

Search Books Google

Sep
11
2011

Google uses enough energy to continuously power 200,000 homes.

Google's many data centers around the world burn through 260 million watts—one quarter of the output of a nuclear power plant—the New York Times reports. The company had been cagey about revealing energy usage stats in the past, probably because it didn't want to reveal to competitors how quickly its data centers were growing. It's no longer a secret that Google needs a crazy amount of data centers to keep things running smoothly.

Google Energy Data Cost Resources

  • Google uses enough energy to continuously power 200,000 homes

     

    Google's many data centers around the world burn through 260 million watts—one quarter of the output of a nuclear power plant—the New York Times reports. The company had been cagey about revealing energy usage stats in the past, probably because it didn't want to reveal to competitors how quickly its data centers were growing. It's no longer a secret that Google needs a crazy amount of data centers to keep things running smoothly.

  • Google accounts for roughly 0.013 percent of the world's energy use

     

    Data centers in general are responsible for 1.3 percent of the world's electricity consumption, according to one estimate, and Google says it accounts for a mere one-hundredth of that statistic

  • 3 more annotation(s)...
Sep
9
2011

Google Facebook and Twitter now all have similar products. But Twitter CEO Dick Costolo (somewhat inadvertently) made it clear yesterday that while all three have social networking features and make money from ads, they are in fundamentally different businesses.

At a very basic level, Google+ and Facebook are in the identity delivery business, and Twitter is in the information delivery business. That's a powerful distinction. It reflects a fundamentally different conception of what's more valuable: information or identity. It also gets at who is more valuable, advertisers or users.

Twitter Facebook Google Social Media Identity

Jul
15
2011

Thanks to search engines, most simple facts don’t need to be remembered. They can be accessed with a few keystrokes, plucked from ubiquitous server-stored external memory — and that may be changing how our own memories are maintained.

A study of 46 college students found lower rates of recall on newly-learned facts when students thought those facts were saved on a computer for later recovery.

If you think a fact is conveniently available online, then, you may be less apt to learn it.

Memory Search Google Transactive Memory

  • study co-author and Columbia University psychologist Elizabeth Sparrow said it’s just another form of so-called transactive memory, exhibited by people working in groups in which facts and expertise are distributed.
  • A direct comparison of transactive learning by individuals in groups and on computers has not been performed. It would be interesting to see how they stack up, said Sparrow.

     

    It would also be interesting to further compare how transactive and internal memory function. They could affect other thought processes: For example, someone relying on internalized memory may review and synthesize other memories during recall.

     

    One small but intriguing effect in the new study involved students who were less able to identify subtly manipulated facts, such as a changed name or date, when drawing on memories they thought were saved online.

Jul
2
2011

Aleem Walji, practice manager for innovation at the World Bank Institute, which assists and advises policy makers and NGOs, tells the Guardian's Activate summit in London about the organisation's commitment to open data

Open Open Government Data World World Bank Transparency Collaboration Google

Jun
29
2011

Google has secretly unveiled a new service called “What do you love?” (or, wdyl.com) to help you find out, well, what you love. Think of it as something like a search engine, but instead of searching the Web for “something”, you actually search across various Google services for “something”.

For example, searching for “shoes” gives you the option to translate shoes into 57 languages via Google Translate, find books about shoes via Google Books, watch videos of shoes via YouTube, read the latest news about shoes via Google News, and more.

Google Search Engine Optimization

  • WDYL is nothing but self-promotional, getting users to take a look at other Google services which they might never have known existed.

     

    And of course, this is still search, which is Google’s core business. WDLY merely presents search in a more visually appealing manner; so again, this could tie in with some future marketing effort.

Jun
28
2011

Content farms, which have flourished on the Web in the past 18 months, are massive news sites that use headlines, keywords and other tricks to lure Web-users into looking at ads. These sites confound and embarrass Google by gaming its ranking system. As a business proposition, they once seemed exciting. Last year, The Economist admiringly described Associated Content and Demand Media as cleverly cynical operations that “aim to produce content at a price so low that even meager advertising revenue can support it.”

Search Engine Optimization Google Content Capitalism Advertising Crowd-Sourcing Mechanical Turk

  • As a verbal artifact, farmed content exhibits neither style nor substance.
  • The insultingly vacuous and frankly bizarre prose of the content farms — it seems ripped from Wikipedia and translated from the Romanian — cheapens all online information.
  • 7 more annotation(s)...
Jun
26
2011

  • Page could have preempted the hard-edged conversation with his analysts recently by proving that Google is ready to fully participate in the opportunity presented by the social Web.  If framed well, and backed by demonstrative action, this could even help to highlight the potential upside in Google's future, and that's always a positive when it comes to dealing with the Street.
  • the entire nature of the Web has been transformed from a bunch of pages on servers that Google crawls, to the world's people connected to each other and sharing their lives
  • 1 more annotation(s)...
Jun
25
2011

US regulators are poised to launch a formal investigation into whether Google has abused its dominance on the web, according to reports.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is days away from serving subpoenas on the internet giant in what could be the biggest investigation yet of the search company's business, according to The Wall Street Journal. Both Google and the FTC declined to comment.

A wide-ranging investigation into Google has been discussed for months. Google has faced several antitrust probes in recent years, and is already the subject of a similar investigation in Europe. In the US inquiries have so far largely been limited to reviews of the company's mergers and acquisitions.

Google Monopoly Anti-Competition Antitrust

  • The inquiry will examine the heart of Google's search-advertising business, and the source of most of Google's revenue. Google accounts for around two-thirds of internet searches in the US (and close to 90% in the UK) and according to critics unfairly uses that dominance to favour its own growing network of services.

    Last November, the European commission opened its own formal investigation into allegations that Google discriminated against competing services in its search results and prevented some websites from using ads by Google competitors.

  • Legal experts said the investigation could be similar in scale to the massive antitrust probe of Microsoft, which started in 1991 and ended in a settlement a decade later. Professor Joshua Wright of George Mason Law School said: "The investigation will be of a comparable scale to that of Microsoft."

    But he said the chances of Google being found guilty of antitrust behaviour, as Microsoft was, were far smaller. Wright said for the US to bring a successful case against Google, it would have to prove the company was harming consumers. "As an outsider I would say that obstacle is far higher for them today with Google than it was back then with Microsoft," he said.

  • 1 more annotation(s)...
Jun
21
2011

With classes, homework, and projects–not to mention your social life–time is truly at a premium for you, so why not latch onto the wide world that Google has to offer? From super-effective search tricks to Google hacks specifically for education to tricks and tips for using Gmail, Google Docs, and Google Calendar, these tricks will surely save you some precious time.

Search Tricks

These search tricks can save you time when researching online for your next project or just to find out what time it is across the world, so start using these right away.

Google Search Engine Optimization Technology

Jun
19
2011

Two of the most important Google mobile services: voice search and visual search will now be available from your computer.

Voice search, a feature that's built into Android, also works in Google Chrome and allows you to search using your voice. Chrome added support for the Speech Input API back in April and it's the only browser that implemented the API. Right now, Chrome's speech input feature is only available for English.

Search Engine Optimization Google

  • Google Goggles is a full-fledged visual search engine that's trapped in a mobile application. But why do you have to buy a smartphone to use Google Goggles when you could simply upload an image to Google and find related pages and images on the Web? "Search by Image" does more than TinEye, the "reverse image search engine" that lets you find an image on the Web.
1 - 20 of 34 Next ›
Showing 20 items per page

Diigo is about better ways to research, share and collaborate on information. Learn more »

Join Diigo
Move to top