more fromcontent.healthaffairs.org
in list: Privacy in the digital age
more fromwww.privacyinternational.org
in list: Privacy in the digital age
more fromwww.privacyrights.org
in list: Privacy in the digital age
more fromwww.rand.org
in list: Privacy in the digital age
more fromwww.nap.edu
in list: Privacy in the digital age
more fromwww.eff.org
in list: Privacy in the digital age
more fromscout.wisc.edu
in list: Privacy in the digital age
more fromwww.anu.edu.au
in list: Privacy in the digital age
more fromepic.org
in list: Privacy in the digital age
more fromepic.org
in list: Privacy in the digital age
more fromcaselaw.lp.findlaw.com
in list: Privacy in the digital age
more fromwww.netatty.com
in list: Privacy in the digital age
more fromosaka.law.miami.edu
in list: Privacy in the digital age
more fromwww.bizjournals.com
Notation: * = Private bookmark and comment|… = Clipping [?] | … = Public highlight [?]
Claims and evidence: This article cites other statistics which seem to show that persons without insurance have a higher likelihood of developing untreatable forms of cancer.
Author's tone: The text is presented more as a press release, and carries with it heavy bias towards believing the statistics.
Judgment: This article provides a counterweight to the idea that insurance for all is ideal, even thought it didn't plan to do so when it was written. The inclusion of the similar statistics for Medicare patients undermines its basic premise.
Evaluation: This article is not a "good" source, as it is more akin to a newspaper article.
Forecast: I plan to use this article as a counterweight to my belief that a socialized system should be implemented, and to use other statistics to show that even Medicare-insured patients are better off, but that Medicare might not be the way to go.