Home
Todd Suomela's Library tagged → View Popular
New Media Literacies
New Media Literacies (NML), a research initiative based within USC's Annenberg School for Communication, explores how we might best equip young people with the social skills and cultural competencies required to become full participants in an emergent media landscape and raise public understanding about what it means to be literate in a globally interconnected, multicultural world.
Overcoming Bias : Stupider Than You Realize
A common bias among the smart is to overestimate how smart everyone else is. This was certainly my experience in moving from top rank universities as a student to a mid rank university as a teacher. A better intuition for common abilities can be found by browsing the US National Assesment of Adult Literacy sample questions.
Matthew Yglesias » Literacy and Democracy
But a more fundamental issue than whether or not people can avail themselves of a home internet connection is that a terrifyingly large proportion of Americans can’t read and internet access isn’t going to be very helpful absent literacy:
Cites & Insights 8:12 - Writing about Reading
They’re at it again.
The doom-cryers who assert we don’t read any more—or, if we do, it’s not the right kind of reading, not the literary reading we all used to do every single day back in the Golden Age of universal literacy.
A Physics Professor and a Science Librarian Challenge Non-Majors to Evaluate Science
Required science courses can have limited interest from some students. In this article, a physics professor and a science librarian describe methods used to engage non majors in learning about science in a non-threatening way. By evaluating the science on selected web sites, and classifying the sites according to six categories (valid, speculation, controversial, uninformed, misrepresentation, and invalid) and then comparing findings with others in the class, students are simultaneously immersing themselves in practices of the scientific community and gaining critical thinking skills.
-
A primary goal of this course is learn how to evaluate a scientific paper or web site without adequate training in the relevant scientific field. We began by establishing six categories for evaluating scientific work:
- Valid: Most scientists would agree with the thesis, data, and conclusions drawn in the paper.
- Speculation: Most scientists would agree with the paper's thesis, but the thesis statement lacks strong experimental evidence. An example of this would be wormholes in spacetime: they are predicted by well established theory, but have never been experimentally observed.
- Controversial: This category refers to scientific, not social controversy. More than one scientific theory exists to explain the evidence. There is usually a lack of consensus within the scientific community on the subject.
- Uninformed: The author is often not an expert in the field and is reporting only part of a larger story. The omissions in these papers are usually due to ignorance, rather than malicious intent. Many student papers posted on the Internet fall under this category.
- Misrepresentation: The author may present a correct statement, but it is either taken out of context or misapplied. The author is often deliberately trying to mislead the reader by ignoring other important evidence not presented in the paper but well known in the field.
- Invalid: Most scientists would disagree with the paper's thesis.
The Art of Wikigroaning
First, find a useful Wikipedia article that normal people might read. For example, the article called "Knight." Then, find a somehow similar article that is longer, but at the same time, useless to a very large fraction of the population. In this case, we
Selected Tags
Related Tags
Sponsored Links
Top Contributors
Groups interested in literacy
-
Media Literacy & Youth
This lets me gather the ass...
Items: 19 | Visits: 95
Created by: E Barney
-
Literacy @ USI
Sites collected for our lit...
Items: 17 | Visits: 96
Created by: Lucy Gray
-
Communication Arts
Items: 155 | Visits: 98
Created by: Stephanie Affield
Diigo is about better ways to research, share and collaborate on information. Learn more »
Join Diigo